Loading…
Improving the quality of care and medical education by involving medical students in providing patient education: a scoping review
Introduction: Studies suggest that quality of care and medical education is increased in student provided patient education. Interventions and outcomes in this field, however, have not yet been systematically reviewed. The authors examined the scientific literature for studies on interventions and o...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of integrated care 2017-10, Vol.17 (5), p.281 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 281 |
container_title | International journal of integrated care |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Vijn, Thomas Willem Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G. Kremer, Jan A.M. Faber, Marjan J. Wollersheim, Hub |
description | Introduction: Studies suggest that quality of care and medical education is increased in student provided patient education. Interventions and outcomes in this field, however, have not yet been systematically reviewed. The authors examined the scientific literature for studies on interventions and outcomes of student provided patient education in a scoping review.Methods: Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO) were searched for studies reporting patient education, undergraduate medical students, and patient-centered outcomes of patient education (patient satisfaction, self-care, health literacy, treatment compliance, health attitude, health behavior, patient empowerment, students’ communication skills, shared decision-making, and relations between (upcoming) care professionals and patients), published between January 1990 and October 2015. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies of the Effective Public Health Practice Project (1). Facilitators and barriers to educational interventions were assessed using the Learning Transfer System Inventory (2). The learning yield, impact on quality of care, and practical feasibility of the interventions were rated by patients, care professionals, researchers, and education professionals based on their personal expertise and rating guidelines.Results: The search resulted in 4,991 hits. Eighteen studies were included in the final synthesis. Study quality was rated weak or moderate. Student provided patient education improved patients’ health knowledge (seven studies), attitude (one study) and behavior (three studies), and enhanced disease management (three studies), medication adherence (one study) and shared decision-making (one study). In addition, involving students in patient education enhanced students’ patient education self-efficacy (four studies) and skills (three studies), relations with patients (two studies), and communication skills (two studies). Experts rated student provided courses, student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and clerkships on patient education with high learning yield and high impact on quality of care.Discussion/conclusions/lessons learned: Student provided patient education improves quality of care and medical education. Medical curricula should contain student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and/or clerkships on pati |
doi_str_mv | 10.5334/ijic.3594 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3100317899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3100317899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c974-ad89d6c1e4d20dc4059d3cd4571ff47037b30a84931d8454fd1cfbd5fe6f8b033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUDtPwzAQthBIlMLAP7DExJBi13Zis6GKR6VKLN0txw9wlcapnRR15ZfjFBAsd6f7Hnf6ALjGaMYIoXd-4_WMMEFPwASzkhc019N_8zm4SGmD0LxkvJyAz-W2i2Hv2zfYv1u4G1Tj-wMMDmoVLVStgVtrvFYNtGbQqvehhfUB-nYfmqPsF079YGzbpwzBo6UZ0S4r8vZPfA8VTDp0Ixjt3tuPS3DmVJPs1U-fgvXT43rxUqxen5eLh1WhRUULZbgwpcaWmjkymiImDNGGsgo7RytEqpogxakg2HDKqDNYu9owZ0vHa0TIFNx82-bndoNNvdyEIbb5oiQYIYIrLkRm3X6zdAwpRetkF_1WxYPESI4JyzFhOSZMvgCIzXF9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3100317899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the quality of care and medical education by involving medical students in providing patient education: a scoping review</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Vijn, Thomas Willem ; Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G. ; Kremer, Jan A.M. ; Faber, Marjan J. ; Wollersheim, Hub</creator><creatorcontrib>Vijn, Thomas Willem ; Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G. ; Kremer, Jan A.M. ; Faber, Marjan J. ; Wollersheim, Hub</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Studies suggest that quality of care and medical education is increased in student provided patient education. Interventions and outcomes in this field, however, have not yet been systematically reviewed. The authors examined the scientific literature for studies on interventions and outcomes of student provided patient education in a scoping review.Methods: Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO) were searched for studies reporting patient education, undergraduate medical students, and patient-centered outcomes of patient education (patient satisfaction, self-care, health literacy, treatment compliance, health attitude, health behavior, patient empowerment, students’ communication skills, shared decision-making, and relations between (upcoming) care professionals and patients), published between January 1990 and October 2015. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies of the Effective Public Health Practice Project (1). Facilitators and barriers to educational interventions were assessed using the Learning Transfer System Inventory (2). The learning yield, impact on quality of care, and practical feasibility of the interventions were rated by patients, care professionals, researchers, and education professionals based on their personal expertise and rating guidelines.Results: The search resulted in 4,991 hits. Eighteen studies were included in the final synthesis. Study quality was rated weak or moderate. Student provided patient education improved patients’ health knowledge (seven studies), attitude (one study) and behavior (three studies), and enhanced disease management (three studies), medication adherence (one study) and shared decision-making (one study). In addition, involving students in patient education enhanced students’ patient education self-efficacy (four studies) and skills (three studies), relations with patients (two studies), and communication skills (two studies). Experts rated student provided courses, student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and clerkships on patient education with high learning yield and high impact on quality of care.Discussion/conclusions/lessons learned: Student provided patient education improves quality of care and medical education. Medical curricula should contain student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and/or clerkships on patient education to enhance the quality of care and medical education. In addition, mature roles for students, training preparation, constructive supervision, peer support on organizational and individual levels, and learning aids should be taken into account when implementing student provided patient education to enhance learning effectiveness.Limitations: The search strategy of our review did not include health status as an outcome, because it’s a debatable outcome of patient education interventions. However, as our review shows that disease management is enhanced when patient education is provided by undergraduate medical students, other studies which were not included in this review may show that health status is improved as well in student provided patient education. In addition, we only searched the scientific literature, therefore, examples of integrating patient education and medical education as reported in the grey literature are not described in this review.Suggestions for future research: Future research should be aimed at further investigating the effects found in this study with high-level evidence.References:1- Hamilton O. Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies. Available from: http://www.ephpp.ca/index.html: Effective Public Health Practice Project; 1998.2- Holton E, Bates, RA, Ruona, WEA. Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2000;11(4):333-60.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-4156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-4156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paterna: Ubiquity Press</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Disease management ; Learning ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Outreach services ; Patient education ; Patient satisfaction ; Public health</subject><ispartof>International journal of integrated care, 2017-10, Vol.17 (5), p.281</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3100317899?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vijn, Thomas Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, Jan A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Marjan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollersheim, Hub</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the quality of care and medical education by involving medical students in providing patient education: a scoping review</title><title>International journal of integrated care</title><description>Introduction: Studies suggest that quality of care and medical education is increased in student provided patient education. Interventions and outcomes in this field, however, have not yet been systematically reviewed. The authors examined the scientific literature for studies on interventions and outcomes of student provided patient education in a scoping review.Methods: Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO) were searched for studies reporting patient education, undergraduate medical students, and patient-centered outcomes of patient education (patient satisfaction, self-care, health literacy, treatment compliance, health attitude, health behavior, patient empowerment, students’ communication skills, shared decision-making, and relations between (upcoming) care professionals and patients), published between January 1990 and October 2015. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies of the Effective Public Health Practice Project (1). Facilitators and barriers to educational interventions were assessed using the Learning Transfer System Inventory (2). The learning yield, impact on quality of care, and practical feasibility of the interventions were rated by patients, care professionals, researchers, and education professionals based on their personal expertise and rating guidelines.Results: The search resulted in 4,991 hits. Eighteen studies were included in the final synthesis. Study quality was rated weak or moderate. Student provided patient education improved patients’ health knowledge (seven studies), attitude (one study) and behavior (three studies), and enhanced disease management (three studies), medication adherence (one study) and shared decision-making (one study). In addition, involving students in patient education enhanced students’ patient education self-efficacy (four studies) and skills (three studies), relations with patients (two studies), and communication skills (two studies). Experts rated student provided courses, student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and clerkships on patient education with high learning yield and high impact on quality of care.Discussion/conclusions/lessons learned: Student provided patient education improves quality of care and medical education. Medical curricula should contain student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and/or clerkships on patient education to enhance the quality of care and medical education. In addition, mature roles for students, training preparation, constructive supervision, peer support on organizational and individual levels, and learning aids should be taken into account when implementing student provided patient education to enhance learning effectiveness.Limitations: The search strategy of our review did not include health status as an outcome, because it’s a debatable outcome of patient education interventions. However, as our review shows that disease management is enhanced when patient education is provided by undergraduate medical students, other studies which were not included in this review may show that health status is improved as well in student provided patient education. In addition, we only searched the scientific literature, therefore, examples of integrating patient education and medical education as reported in the grey literature are not described in this review.Suggestions for future research: Future research should be aimed at further investigating the effects found in this study with high-level evidence.References:1- Hamilton O. Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies. Available from: http://www.ephpp.ca/index.html: Effective Public Health Practice Project; 1998.2- Holton E, Bates, RA, Ruona, WEA. Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2000;11(4):333-60.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Outreach services</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Public health</subject><issn>1568-4156</issn><issn>1568-4156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUDtPwzAQthBIlMLAP7DExJBi13Zis6GKR6VKLN0txw9wlcapnRR15ZfjFBAsd6f7Hnf6ALjGaMYIoXd-4_WMMEFPwASzkhc019N_8zm4SGmD0LxkvJyAz-W2i2Hv2zfYv1u4G1Tj-wMMDmoVLVStgVtrvFYNtGbQqvehhfUB-nYfmqPsF079YGzbpwzBo6UZ0S4r8vZPfA8VTDp0Ixjt3tuPS3DmVJPs1U-fgvXT43rxUqxen5eLh1WhRUULZbgwpcaWmjkymiImDNGGsgo7RytEqpogxakg2HDKqDNYu9owZ0vHa0TIFNx82-bndoNNvdyEIbb5oiQYIYIrLkRm3X6zdAwpRetkF_1WxYPESI4JyzFhOSZMvgCIzXF9</recordid><startdate>20171017</startdate><enddate>20171017</enddate><creator>Vijn, Thomas Willem</creator><creator>Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G.</creator><creator>Kremer, Jan A.M.</creator><creator>Faber, Marjan J.</creator><creator>Wollersheim, Hub</creator><general>Ubiquity Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171017</creationdate><title>Improving the quality of care and medical education by involving medical students in providing patient education: a scoping review</title><author>Vijn, Thomas Willem ; Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G. ; Kremer, Jan A.M. ; Faber, Marjan J. ; Wollersheim, Hub</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c974-ad89d6c1e4d20dc4059d3cd4571ff47037b30a84931d8454fd1cfbd5fe6f8b033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Outreach services</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vijn, Thomas Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, Jan A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Marjan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollersheim, Hub</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International journal of integrated care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vijn, Thomas Willem</au><au>Fluit, Cornelia R.M.G.</au><au>Kremer, Jan A.M.</au><au>Faber, Marjan J.</au><au>Wollersheim, Hub</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving the quality of care and medical education by involving medical students in providing patient education: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of integrated care</jtitle><date>2017-10-17</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>281</spage><pages>281-</pages><issn>1568-4156</issn><eissn>1568-4156</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Studies suggest that quality of care and medical education is increased in student provided patient education. Interventions and outcomes in this field, however, have not yet been systematically reviewed. The authors examined the scientific literature for studies on interventions and outcomes of student provided patient education in a scoping review.Methods: Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO) were searched for studies reporting patient education, undergraduate medical students, and patient-centered outcomes of patient education (patient satisfaction, self-care, health literacy, treatment compliance, health attitude, health behavior, patient empowerment, students’ communication skills, shared decision-making, and relations between (upcoming) care professionals and patients), published between January 1990 and October 2015. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies of the Effective Public Health Practice Project (1). Facilitators and barriers to educational interventions were assessed using the Learning Transfer System Inventory (2). The learning yield, impact on quality of care, and practical feasibility of the interventions were rated by patients, care professionals, researchers, and education professionals based on their personal expertise and rating guidelines.Results: The search resulted in 4,991 hits. Eighteen studies were included in the final synthesis. Study quality was rated weak or moderate. Student provided patient education improved patients’ health knowledge (seven studies), attitude (one study) and behavior (three studies), and enhanced disease management (three studies), medication adherence (one study) and shared decision-making (one study). In addition, involving students in patient education enhanced students’ patient education self-efficacy (four studies) and skills (three studies), relations with patients (two studies), and communication skills (two studies). Experts rated student provided courses, student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and clerkships on patient education with high learning yield and high impact on quality of care.Discussion/conclusions/lessons learned: Student provided patient education improves quality of care and medical education. Medical curricula should contain student-run patient education clinics, student provided outreach programs, student health coaching, and/or clerkships on patient education to enhance the quality of care and medical education. In addition, mature roles for students, training preparation, constructive supervision, peer support on organizational and individual levels, and learning aids should be taken into account when implementing student provided patient education to enhance learning effectiveness.Limitations: The search strategy of our review did not include health status as an outcome, because it’s a debatable outcome of patient education interventions. However, as our review shows that disease management is enhanced when patient education is provided by undergraduate medical students, other studies which were not included in this review may show that health status is improved as well in student provided patient education. In addition, we only searched the scientific literature, therefore, examples of integrating patient education and medical education as reported in the grey literature are not described in this review.Suggestions for future research: Future research should be aimed at further investigating the effects found in this study with high-level evidence.References:1- Hamilton O. Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies. Available from: http://www.ephpp.ca/index.html: Effective Public Health Practice Project; 1998.2- Holton E, Bates, RA, Ruona, WEA. Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2000;11(4):333-60.</abstract><cop>Paterna</cop><pub>Ubiquity Press</pub><doi>10.5334/ijic.3594</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1568-4156 |
ispartof | International journal of integrated care, 2017-10, Vol.17 (5), p.281 |
issn | 1568-4156 1568-4156 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3100317899 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Decision making Disease management Learning Medical education Medical students Outreach services Patient education Patient satisfaction Public health |
title | Improving the quality of care and medical education by involving medical students in providing patient education: a scoping review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20quality%20of%20care%20and%20medical%20education%20by%20involving%20medical%20students%20in%20providing%20patient%20education:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20integrated%20care&rft.au=Vijn,%20Thomas%20Willem&rft.date=2017-10-17&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=281&rft.pages=281-&rft.issn=1568-4156&rft.eissn=1568-4156&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334/ijic.3594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3100317899%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c974-ad89d6c1e4d20dc4059d3cd4571ff47037b30a84931d8454fd1cfbd5fe6f8b033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3100317899&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |