Loading…

Prioritizing the European Investment Sectors Based on Different Economic, Social, and Governance Factors Using a Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN Decision-Making Model

This study tackles the challenge of identifying optimal investment sectors amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which are often complex and conflicting. This research aims to effectively evaluate and prioritize ten investment sectors based on twelve ESG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2024-09, Vol.16 (17), p.7790
Main Authors: Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa, Ionașcu, Alina Elena, Cosma, Sorinel, Barbu, Corina Aurora, Popa, Alexandra, Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana, Goswami, Shankha Shubhra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c148t-3206b1b71b865870d1e7bf465d520b0beb99988e56c4bfdad50935cb12818a0c3
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 7790
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 16
creator Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa
Ionașcu, Alina Elena
Cosma, Sorinel
Barbu, Corina Aurora
Popa, Alexandra
Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana
Goswami, Shankha Shubhra
description This study tackles the challenge of identifying optimal investment sectors amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which are often complex and conflicting. This research aims to effectively evaluate and prioritize ten investment sectors based on twelve ESG criteria by integrating expert evaluations with two advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Three expert teams assessed each sector’s performance based on these criteria using fuzzy logic to manage uncertainties in expert judgments. The MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) identified biodiversity and land use as the most critical factor, while transparency and disclosure was least significant. The AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization) method was further used to rank the ten alternative sectors, with impact investing funds emerging as the top choice, followed by renewable energy and sustainable responsible investment funds. Conversely, ESG-compliant stocks, ESG-focused exchange-traded funds, and ESG-focused real estate investment trusts ranked the lowest. The study’s findings were validated through comparisons with other MCDM tools and sensitivity analysis, confirming the robustness of the proposed model. This research offers a valuable framework for investors looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their decision-making, promoting sustainable and responsible investing practices.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su16177790
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3104155595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104155595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c148t-3206b1b71b865870d1e7bf465d520b0beb99988e56c4bfdad50935cb12818a0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN9PwjAQxxujiQR58S9o4pth2q7rfjwiDCRhYkCel7brtDhabDcS-E_8b92Cid7LXXKfu-_dF4BbjB4ISdCja3CIoyhK0AXo-SjCHkYUXf6rr8HAuS1qgxCc4LAHvl-tMlbV6qT0O6w_JEwba_aSaTjXB-nqndQ1XEtRG-vgE3OygEbDiSpLabtWKow2OyWGcG2EYtUQMl3AmTlIq5kWEk7ZeXbjOgUGp83pdPSydJWOvdFqmY1e4EQK5ZTRXsY-OygzhaxuwFXJKicHv7kPNtP0bfzsLZaz-Xi08AQO4tojPgo55hHmcUjjCBVYRrwMQlpQH3HEJU-SJI4lDUXAy4IVFCWECo79GMcMCdIHd-e9e2u-mvbjfGua9vbK5QSjAFNKE9pS92dKWOOclWW-t2rH7DHHKO_cz__cJz96Qnc7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104155595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritizing the European Investment Sectors Based on Different Economic, Social, and Governance Factors Using a Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN Decision-Making Model</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa ; Ionașcu, Alina Elena ; Cosma, Sorinel ; Barbu, Corina Aurora ; Popa, Alexandra ; Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana ; Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</creator><creatorcontrib>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa ; Ionașcu, Alina Elena ; Cosma, Sorinel ; Barbu, Corina Aurora ; Popa, Alexandra ; Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana ; Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</creatorcontrib><description>This study tackles the challenge of identifying optimal investment sectors amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which are often complex and conflicting. This research aims to effectively evaluate and prioritize ten investment sectors based on twelve ESG criteria by integrating expert evaluations with two advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Three expert teams assessed each sector’s performance based on these criteria using fuzzy logic to manage uncertainties in expert judgments. The MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) identified biodiversity and land use as the most critical factor, while transparency and disclosure was least significant. The AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization) method was further used to rank the ten alternative sectors, with impact investing funds emerging as the top choice, followed by renewable energy and sustainable responsible investment funds. Conversely, ESG-compliant stocks, ESG-focused exchange-traded funds, and ESG-focused real estate investment trusts ranked the lowest. The study’s findings were validated through comparisons with other MCDM tools and sensitivity analysis, confirming the robustness of the proposed model. This research offers a valuable framework for investors looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their decision-making, promoting sustainable and responsible investing practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16177790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Decision making ; Environmental science ; Financial analysis ; Fuzzy logic ; Global economy ; Investors ; Literature reviews ; Social investing ; Social responsibility ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-09, Vol.16 (17), p.7790</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c148t-3206b1b71b865870d1e7bf465d520b0beb99988e56c4bfdad50935cb12818a0c3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-7736-8270 ; 0000-0002-0033-3089</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3104155595/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3104155595?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566,74382,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionașcu, Alina Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosma, Sorinel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbu, Corina Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popa, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritizing the European Investment Sectors Based on Different Economic, Social, and Governance Factors Using a Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN Decision-Making Model</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This study tackles the challenge of identifying optimal investment sectors amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which are often complex and conflicting. This research aims to effectively evaluate and prioritize ten investment sectors based on twelve ESG criteria by integrating expert evaluations with two advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Three expert teams assessed each sector’s performance based on these criteria using fuzzy logic to manage uncertainties in expert judgments. The MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) identified biodiversity and land use as the most critical factor, while transparency and disclosure was least significant. The AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization) method was further used to rank the ten alternative sectors, with impact investing funds emerging as the top choice, followed by renewable energy and sustainable responsible investment funds. Conversely, ESG-compliant stocks, ESG-focused exchange-traded funds, and ESG-focused real estate investment trusts ranked the lowest. The study’s findings were validated through comparisons with other MCDM tools and sensitivity analysis, confirming the robustness of the proposed model. This research offers a valuable framework for investors looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their decision-making, promoting sustainable and responsible investing practices.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Social investing</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN9PwjAQxxujiQR58S9o4pth2q7rfjwiDCRhYkCel7brtDhabDcS-E_8b92Cid7LXXKfu-_dF4BbjB4ISdCja3CIoyhK0AXo-SjCHkYUXf6rr8HAuS1qgxCc4LAHvl-tMlbV6qT0O6w_JEwba_aSaTjXB-nqndQ1XEtRG-vgE3OygEbDiSpLabtWKow2OyWGcG2EYtUQMl3AmTlIq5kWEk7ZeXbjOgUGp83pdPSydJWOvdFqmY1e4EQK5ZTRXsY-OygzhaxuwFXJKicHv7kPNtP0bfzsLZaz-Xi08AQO4tojPgo55hHmcUjjCBVYRrwMQlpQH3HEJU-SJI4lDUXAy4IVFCWECo79GMcMCdIHd-e9e2u-mvbjfGua9vbK5QSjAFNKE9pS92dKWOOclWW-t2rH7DHHKO_cz__cJz96Qnc7</recordid><startdate>20240906</startdate><enddate>20240906</enddate><creator>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa</creator><creator>Ionașcu, Alina Elena</creator><creator>Cosma, Sorinel</creator><creator>Barbu, Corina Aurora</creator><creator>Popa, Alexandra</creator><creator>Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana</creator><creator>Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7736-8270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-3089</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240906</creationdate><title>Prioritizing the European Investment Sectors Based on Different Economic, Social, and Governance Factors Using a Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN Decision-Making Model</title><author>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa ; Ionașcu, Alina Elena ; Cosma, Sorinel ; Barbu, Corina Aurora ; Popa, Alexandra ; Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana ; Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c148t-3206b1b71b865870d1e7bf465d520b0beb99988e56c4bfdad50935cb12818a0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Social investing</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionașcu, Alina Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosma, Sorinel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbu, Corina Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popa, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olteanu (Burcă), Andreea Larisa</au><au>Ionașcu, Alina Elena</au><au>Cosma, Sorinel</au><au>Barbu, Corina Aurora</au><au>Popa, Alexandra</au><au>Cioroiu, Corina Georgiana</au><au>Goswami, Shankha Shubhra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritizing the European Investment Sectors Based on Different Economic, Social, and Governance Factors Using a Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN Decision-Making Model</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-09-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>7790</spage><pages>7790-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This study tackles the challenge of identifying optimal investment sectors amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, which are often complex and conflicting. This research aims to effectively evaluate and prioritize ten investment sectors based on twelve ESG criteria by integrating expert evaluations with two advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Three expert teams assessed each sector’s performance based on these criteria using fuzzy logic to manage uncertainties in expert judgments. The MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) identified biodiversity and land use as the most critical factor, while transparency and disclosure was least significant. The AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization) method was further used to rank the ten alternative sectors, with impact investing funds emerging as the top choice, followed by renewable energy and sustainable responsible investment funds. Conversely, ESG-compliant stocks, ESG-focused exchange-traded funds, and ESG-focused real estate investment trusts ranked the lowest. The study’s findings were validated through comparisons with other MCDM tools and sensitivity analysis, confirming the robustness of the proposed model. This research offers a valuable framework for investors looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their decision-making, promoting sustainable and responsible investing practices.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16177790</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7736-8270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-3089</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2024-09, Vol.16 (17), p.7790
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3104155595
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Climate change
Decision making
Environmental science
Financial analysis
Fuzzy logic
Global economy
Investors
Literature reviews
Social investing
Social responsibility
Sustainability
title Prioritizing the European Investment Sectors Based on Different Economic, Social, and Governance Factors Using a Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN Decision-Making Model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T04%3A20%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritizing%20the%20European%20Investment%20Sectors%20Based%20on%20Different%20Economic,%20Social,%20and%20Governance%20Factors%20Using%20a%20Fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN%20Decision-Making%20Model&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Olteanu%20(Burc%C4%83),%20Andreea%20Larisa&rft.date=2024-09-06&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=7790&rft.pages=7790-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16177790&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3104155595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c148t-3206b1b71b865870d1e7bf465d520b0beb99988e56c4bfdad50935cb12818a0c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104155595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true