Loading…
How upper secondary students figure chemistry
The formation of chemistry identities among students is closely linked to the norms and practices prevalent in their chemistry learning environments. However, these norms may not be equally accessible or aligned with formal assessment criteria, leading to disparities for students in cultivating a po...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2024-09, Vol.25 (4), p.1289-131 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-97782b93d76403ab9811e2628aca3c8990e9025aa469b6c756a2af9b23e9fb813 |
container_end_page | 131 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1289 |
container_title | Chemistry Education Research and Practice |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Niemann, Jonas Holmegaard, Henriette Madsen, Lene Møller |
description | The formation of chemistry identities among students is closely linked to the norms and practices prevalent in their chemistry learning environments. However, these norms may not be equally accessible or aligned with formal assessment criteria, leading to disparities for students in cultivating a positive chemistry identity. This study investigates how students conceptualise chemistry and the opportunities it affords for identity formation. Drawing upon the theoretical frameworks of figured worlds and science identity, data were collected from 45 upper secondary school students across three Danish schools through classroom observations and focus groups. The findings reveal that students perceive the laboratory and classroom settings as distinct in purpose, nature, and relevance, with varying degrees of celebration for enacted performance in each. While work in and related to the laboratory is highly valued by both students and teachers, individual enacted performance in the classroom is often equated with proficiency in chemistry. However, implicit norms for example governing the division of labour in laboratories indicate an inequitable distribution of tasks and underscore the need for a more equitable approach to identity formation in chemistry education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d4rp00145a |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3107908514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3107908514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-97782b93d76403ab9811e2628aca3c8990e9025aa469b6c756a2af9b23e9fb813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK5evAsFb0J0Jkmb5LisHyssKKLnkKapdnHbmrTI_nujFT3NHB7ed-Yh5BThEoHrq0qEHgBFbvfIDGVeUERQ-2lH0FQAU4fkKMYNQJ5LqWaErrrPbOx7H7LoXddWNuyyOIyVb4eY1c3rGHzm3vy2iUPYHZOD2r5Hf_I75-Tl9uZ5uaLrh7v75WJNHUoYqE7RrNS8koUAbkutED0rmLLOcqe0Bq-B5daKQpeFS2daZmtdMu51XSrkc3I-5fah-xh9HMymG0ObKg1HkBpUjiJRFxPlQhdj8LXpQ7NNDxgE863DXIunxx8diwSfTXCI7o_718W_AAZuWtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3107908514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How upper secondary students figure chemistry</title><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Niemann, Jonas ; Holmegaard, Henriette ; Madsen, Lene Møller</creator><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Jonas ; Holmegaard, Henriette ; Madsen, Lene Møller</creatorcontrib><description>The formation of chemistry identities among students is closely linked to the norms and practices prevalent in their chemistry learning environments. However, these norms may not be equally accessible or aligned with formal assessment criteria, leading to disparities for students in cultivating a positive chemistry identity. This study investigates how students conceptualise chemistry and the opportunities it affords for identity formation. Drawing upon the theoretical frameworks of figured worlds and science identity, data were collected from 45 upper secondary school students across three Danish schools through classroom observations and focus groups. The findings reveal that students perceive the laboratory and classroom settings as distinct in purpose, nature, and relevance, with varying degrees of celebration for enacted performance in each. While work in and related to the laboratory is highly valued by both students and teachers, individual enacted performance in the classroom is often equated with proficiency in chemistry. However, implicit norms for example governing the division of labour in laboratories indicate an inequitable distribution of tasks and underscore the need for a more equitable approach to identity formation in chemistry education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1109-4028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1109-4028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d4rp00145a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ioannina: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Classrooms ; Identity formation ; Laboratories ; Norms ; Students</subject><ispartof>Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2024-09, Vol.25 (4), p.1289-131</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-97782b93d76403ab9811e2628aca3c8990e9025aa469b6c756a2af9b23e9fb813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3304-8882 ; 0000-0003-4245-3983 ; 0000-0001-7149-9142</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmegaard, Henriette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Lene Møller</creatorcontrib><title>How upper secondary students figure chemistry</title><title>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</title><description>The formation of chemistry identities among students is closely linked to the norms and practices prevalent in their chemistry learning environments. However, these norms may not be equally accessible or aligned with formal assessment criteria, leading to disparities for students in cultivating a positive chemistry identity. This study investigates how students conceptualise chemistry and the opportunities it affords for identity formation. Drawing upon the theoretical frameworks of figured worlds and science identity, data were collected from 45 upper secondary school students across three Danish schools through classroom observations and focus groups. The findings reveal that students perceive the laboratory and classroom settings as distinct in purpose, nature, and relevance, with varying degrees of celebration for enacted performance in each. While work in and related to the laboratory is highly valued by both students and teachers, individual enacted performance in the classroom is often equated with proficiency in chemistry. However, implicit norms for example governing the division of labour in laboratories indicate an inequitable distribution of tasks and underscore the need for a more equitable approach to identity formation in chemistry education.</description><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1109-4028</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><issn>1109-4028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK5evAsFb0J0Jkmb5LisHyssKKLnkKapdnHbmrTI_nujFT3NHB7ed-Yh5BThEoHrq0qEHgBFbvfIDGVeUERQ-2lH0FQAU4fkKMYNQJ5LqWaErrrPbOx7H7LoXddWNuyyOIyVb4eY1c3rGHzm3vy2iUPYHZOD2r5Hf_I75-Tl9uZ5uaLrh7v75WJNHUoYqE7RrNS8koUAbkutED0rmLLOcqe0Bq-B5daKQpeFS2daZmtdMu51XSrkc3I-5fah-xh9HMymG0ObKg1HkBpUjiJRFxPlQhdj8LXpQ7NNDxgE863DXIunxx8diwSfTXCI7o_718W_AAZuWtA</recordid><startdate>20240923</startdate><enddate>20240923</enddate><creator>Niemann, Jonas</creator><creator>Holmegaard, Henriette</creator><creator>Madsen, Lene Møller</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-8882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-3983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7149-9142</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240923</creationdate><title>How upper secondary students figure chemistry</title><author>Niemann, Jonas ; Holmegaard, Henriette ; Madsen, Lene Møller</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-97782b93d76403ab9811e2628aca3c8990e9025aa469b6c756a2af9b23e9fb813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niemann, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmegaard, Henriette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Lene Møller</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niemann, Jonas</au><au>Holmegaard, Henriette</au><au>Madsen, Lene Møller</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How upper secondary students figure chemistry</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</jtitle><date>2024-09-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1289</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>1289-131</pages><issn>1109-4028</issn><eissn>1756-1108</eissn><eissn>1109-4028</eissn><abstract>The formation of chemistry identities among students is closely linked to the norms and practices prevalent in their chemistry learning environments. However, these norms may not be equally accessible or aligned with formal assessment criteria, leading to disparities for students in cultivating a positive chemistry identity. This study investigates how students conceptualise chemistry and the opportunities it affords for identity formation. Drawing upon the theoretical frameworks of figured worlds and science identity, data were collected from 45 upper secondary school students across three Danish schools through classroom observations and focus groups. The findings reveal that students perceive the laboratory and classroom settings as distinct in purpose, nature, and relevance, with varying degrees of celebration for enacted performance in each. While work in and related to the laboratory is highly valued by both students and teachers, individual enacted performance in the classroom is often equated with proficiency in chemistry. However, implicit norms for example governing the division of labour in laboratories indicate an inequitable distribution of tasks and underscore the need for a more equitable approach to identity formation in chemistry education.</abstract><cop>Ioannina</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d4rp00145a</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-8882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-3983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7149-9142</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1109-4028 |
ispartof | Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2024-09, Vol.25 (4), p.1289-131 |
issn | 1109-4028 1756-1108 1109-4028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3107908514 |
source | Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Classrooms Identity formation Laboratories Norms Students |
title | How upper secondary students figure chemistry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20upper%20secondary%20students%20figure%20chemistry&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20Education%20Research%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Niemann,%20Jonas&rft.date=2024-09-23&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1289&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=1289-131&rft.issn=1109-4028&rft.eissn=1756-1108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d4rp00145a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3107908514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-97782b93d76403ab9811e2628aca3c8990e9025aa469b6c756a2af9b23e9fb813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3107908514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |