Loading…

Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study

In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties impro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polymer composites 2024-10, Vol.45 (14), p.13164-13179
Main Authors: Garg, Anushka, Basu, Soumen, Mahajan, Roop L., Mehta, Rajeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63
container_end_page 13179
container_issue 14
container_start_page 13164
container_title Polymer composites
container_volume 45
creator Garg, Anushka
Basu, Soumen
Mahajan, Roop L.
Mehta, Rajeev
description In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites. Highlights 0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths. Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased. 0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths. FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy. GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites. Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pc.28694
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111433099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3111433099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtqHDEQhkWwIWM7kCMIssmmHT36oc7ODH4EDDHBWTfVUk1GpltqS-o4vcsRfJVcySexxmPIyquiqr7__6GKkI-cnXLGxJdJnwpVt-U7suJVqQpW1e0BWTHRiELJtnlPjmK8yySva7ki_87dFpzGEV2i1tERde6thoFOwU8YksVI_YZeXvy4efr7qD0MuRgM9jca-ivAtEWH1P-xBqn24-SjTVnSLxSMscl6t5OP85DsAwxDFmkIfZ46cD7NfWbBGbrNO7_stP8XX-nZiyUESDmOxjSb5YQcbmCI-OG1HpOfF-e366vi-vvlt_XZdaG5KsuiUsi11I1opciHaYApIcCgFKUChQybVmkpkQtdbaqaIW9UJYD1WJq-7mt5TD7tffMd7meMqbvzc3A5spOc81JK1raZ-ryndPAxBtx0U7AjhKXjrNs9pJt09_KQjBZ79MEOuLzJdTfrPf8M-NiRPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111433099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Garg, Anushka ; Basu, Soumen ; Mahajan, Roop L. ; Mehta, Rajeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Garg, Anushka ; Basu, Soumen ; Mahajan, Roop L. ; Mehta, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites. Highlights 0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths. Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased. 0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths. FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy. GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites. Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-8397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-0569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pc.28694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesive strength ; Anthracite ; Clay ; coal‐derived GO ; Comparative studies ; Composite materials ; Cost analysis ; Epoxy resins ; Flexural strength ; Glass fiber reinforced plastics ; Glass-epoxy composites ; Graphene ; halloysite nanotubes ; Impact strength ; Mechanical properties ; Multi wall carbon nanotubes ; multiwalled carbon nanotubes ; Nanocomposites ; Polymers ; Tensile strength ; VARIM</subject><ispartof>Polymer composites, 2024-10, Vol.45 (14), p.13164-13179</ispartof><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers.</rights><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-2449-8864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garg, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Soumen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Roop L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</title><title>Polymer composites</title><description>In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites. Highlights 0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths. Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased. 0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths. FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy. GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites. Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.</description><subject>Adhesive strength</subject><subject>Anthracite</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>coal‐derived GO</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Epoxy resins</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Glass-epoxy composites</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>halloysite nanotubes</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Multi wall carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>multiwalled carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>Nanocomposites</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>VARIM</subject><issn>0272-8397</issn><issn>1548-0569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtqHDEQhkWwIWM7kCMIssmmHT36oc7ODH4EDDHBWTfVUk1GpltqS-o4vcsRfJVcySexxmPIyquiqr7__6GKkI-cnXLGxJdJnwpVt-U7suJVqQpW1e0BWTHRiELJtnlPjmK8yySva7ki_87dFpzGEV2i1tERde6thoFOwU8YksVI_YZeXvy4efr7qD0MuRgM9jca-ivAtEWH1P-xBqn24-SjTVnSLxSMscl6t5OP85DsAwxDFmkIfZ46cD7NfWbBGbrNO7_stP8XX-nZiyUESDmOxjSb5YQcbmCI-OG1HpOfF-e366vi-vvlt_XZdaG5KsuiUsi11I1opciHaYApIcCgFKUChQybVmkpkQtdbaqaIW9UJYD1WJq-7mt5TD7tffMd7meMqbvzc3A5spOc81JK1raZ-ryndPAxBtx0U7AjhKXjrNs9pJt09_KQjBZ79MEOuLzJdTfrPf8M-NiRPw</recordid><startdate>20241010</startdate><enddate>20241010</enddate><creator>Garg, Anushka</creator><creator>Basu, Soumen</creator><creator>Mahajan, Roop L.</creator><creator>Mehta, Rajeev</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2449-8864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241010</creationdate><title>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</title><author>Garg, Anushka ; Basu, Soumen ; Mahajan, Roop L. ; Mehta, Rajeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesive strength</topic><topic>Anthracite</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>coal‐derived GO</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Epoxy resins</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Glass-epoxy composites</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>halloysite nanotubes</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Multi wall carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>multiwalled carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>Nanocomposites</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>VARIM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garg, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Soumen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Roop L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer composites</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garg, Anushka</au><au>Basu, Soumen</au><au>Mahajan, Roop L.</au><au>Mehta, Rajeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Polymer composites</jtitle><date>2024-10-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>13164</spage><epage>13179</epage><pages>13164-13179</pages><issn>0272-8397</issn><eissn>1548-0569</eissn><abstract>In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites. Highlights 0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths. Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased. 0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths. FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy. GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites. Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pc.28694</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2449-8864</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-8397
ispartof Polymer composites, 2024-10, Vol.45 (14), p.13164-13179
issn 0272-8397
1548-0569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3111433099
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adhesive strength
Anthracite
Clay
coal‐derived GO
Comparative studies
Composite materials
Cost analysis
Epoxy resins
Flexural strength
Glass fiber reinforced plastics
Glass-epoxy composites
Graphene
halloysite nanotubes
Impact strength
Mechanical properties
Multi wall carbon nanotubes
multiwalled carbon nanotubes
Nanocomposites
Polymers
Tensile strength
VARIM
title Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A15%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancement%20in%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20GFRP%E2%80%90coal%E2%80%90derived%20graphene%20oxide%20composites%20by%20addition%20of%20multiwalled%20carbon%20nanotubes%20and%20halloysite%20nanotubes:%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20composites&rft.au=Garg,%20Anushka&rft.date=2024-10-10&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=13164&rft.epage=13179&rft.pages=13164-13179&rft.issn=0272-8397&rft.eissn=1548-0569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pc.28694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111433099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111433099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true