Loading…
Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study
In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties impro...
Saved in:
Published in: | Polymer composites 2024-10, Vol.45 (14), p.13164-13179 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63 |
container_end_page | 13179 |
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 13164 |
container_title | Polymer composites |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Garg, Anushka Basu, Soumen Mahajan, Roop L. Mehta, Rajeev |
description | In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites.
Highlights
0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths.
Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased.
0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths.
FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy.
GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites.
Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pc.28694 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3111433099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3111433099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtqHDEQhkWwIWM7kCMIssmmHT36oc7ODH4EDDHBWTfVUk1GpltqS-o4vcsRfJVcySexxmPIyquiqr7__6GKkI-cnXLGxJdJnwpVt-U7suJVqQpW1e0BWTHRiELJtnlPjmK8yySva7ki_87dFpzGEV2i1tERde6thoFOwU8YksVI_YZeXvy4efr7qD0MuRgM9jca-ivAtEWH1P-xBqn24-SjTVnSLxSMscl6t5OP85DsAwxDFmkIfZ46cD7NfWbBGbrNO7_stP8XX-nZiyUESDmOxjSb5YQcbmCI-OG1HpOfF-e366vi-vvlt_XZdaG5KsuiUsi11I1opciHaYApIcCgFKUChQybVmkpkQtdbaqaIW9UJYD1WJq-7mt5TD7tffMd7meMqbvzc3A5spOc81JK1raZ-ryndPAxBtx0U7AjhKXjrNs9pJt09_KQjBZ79MEOuLzJdTfrPf8M-NiRPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111433099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Garg, Anushka ; Basu, Soumen ; Mahajan, Roop L. ; Mehta, Rajeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Garg, Anushka ; Basu, Soumen ; Mahajan, Roop L. ; Mehta, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites.
Highlights
0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths.
Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased.
0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths.
FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy.
GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites.
Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-8397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-0569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pc.28694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesive strength ; Anthracite ; Clay ; coal‐derived GO ; Comparative studies ; Composite materials ; Cost analysis ; Epoxy resins ; Flexural strength ; Glass fiber reinforced plastics ; Glass-epoxy composites ; Graphene ; halloysite nanotubes ; Impact strength ; Mechanical properties ; Multi wall carbon nanotubes ; multiwalled carbon nanotubes ; Nanocomposites ; Polymers ; Tensile strength ; VARIM</subject><ispartof>Polymer composites, 2024-10, Vol.45 (14), p.13164-13179</ispartof><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers.</rights><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-2449-8864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garg, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Soumen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Roop L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</title><title>Polymer composites</title><description>In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites.
Highlights
0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths.
Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased.
0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths.
FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy.
GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites.
Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.</description><subject>Adhesive strength</subject><subject>Anthracite</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>coal‐derived GO</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Epoxy resins</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Glass-epoxy composites</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>halloysite nanotubes</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Multi wall carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>multiwalled carbon nanotubes</subject><subject>Nanocomposites</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>VARIM</subject><issn>0272-8397</issn><issn>1548-0569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtqHDEQhkWwIWM7kCMIssmmHT36oc7ODH4EDDHBWTfVUk1GpltqS-o4vcsRfJVcySexxmPIyquiqr7__6GKkI-cnXLGxJdJnwpVt-U7suJVqQpW1e0BWTHRiELJtnlPjmK8yySva7ki_87dFpzGEV2i1tERde6thoFOwU8YksVI_YZeXvy4efr7qD0MuRgM9jca-ivAtEWH1P-xBqn24-SjTVnSLxSMscl6t5OP85DsAwxDFmkIfZ46cD7NfWbBGbrNO7_stP8XX-nZiyUESDmOxjSb5YQcbmCI-OG1HpOfF-e366vi-vvlt_XZdaG5KsuiUsi11I1opciHaYApIcCgFKUChQybVmkpkQtdbaqaIW9UJYD1WJq-7mt5TD7tffMd7meMqbvzc3A5spOc81JK1raZ-ryndPAxBtx0U7AjhKXjrNs9pJt09_KQjBZ79MEOuLzJdTfrPf8M-NiRPw</recordid><startdate>20241010</startdate><enddate>20241010</enddate><creator>Garg, Anushka</creator><creator>Basu, Soumen</creator><creator>Mahajan, Roop L.</creator><creator>Mehta, Rajeev</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2449-8864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241010</creationdate><title>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</title><author>Garg, Anushka ; Basu, Soumen ; Mahajan, Roop L. ; Mehta, Rajeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesive strength</topic><topic>Anthracite</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>coal‐derived GO</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Epoxy resins</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Glass-epoxy composites</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>halloysite nanotubes</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Multi wall carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>multiwalled carbon nanotubes</topic><topic>Nanocomposites</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>VARIM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garg, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Soumen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Roop L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer composites</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garg, Anushka</au><au>Basu, Soumen</au><au>Mahajan, Roop L.</au><au>Mehta, Rajeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Polymer composites</jtitle><date>2024-10-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>13164</spage><epage>13179</epage><pages>13164-13179</pages><issn>0272-8397</issn><eissn>1548-0569</eissn><abstract>In this study, we compare synergistic performance of two different nanofillers, namely halloysite nanotubes (HNT) clay and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), in conjunction with a fixed concentration (0.125 phr) of semi‐anthracite coal‐derived graphene oxide (AC‐GO) on mechanical properties improvement of EGFPs (E‐glass fiber‐based epoxy resin composites). The dispersion of AC‐GO with HNT clay (GO‐H) and AC‐GO with MWCNT (GO‐C) within epoxy matrix was achieved using sonication and homogenization. Further mixture was incorporated into mats of E‐glass fiber employing “vacuum‐assisted resin infusion molding” (VARIM). Significant enhancements (18.3% flexural strength, 14.6% tensile strength, and a slight increase of impact strength (1.8%)) were observed in EGFPs reinforced with GO‐H at 0.50 phr loading of HNT, with an AC‐GO concentration maintained at 0.125 phr. Correspondingly, optimal values for GO‐C reinforced EGFPs at 0.25 phr were 40.3%, 18.7%, and a 10.5% decrease in impact strength, respectively. Analytical techniques such as XRD, FESEM, EDX mapping, and FTIR reveal presence of relatively abundant functionalities and strong interfacial adhesion in GO‐H as well as GO‐C. The cost of HNT clay is approximately 15 times cheaper than industrial‐grade MWCNTs, therefore, these results underscore potential of GO‐H as a very economical nano‐reinforcement alternative to GO‐C for polymer nanocomposites.
Highlights
0.50 phr HAGRP improves 18.3% flexural, 14.6% tensile, 1.8% impact strengths.
Beyond 0.50 phr HAGRP and 0.25 phr CAGRP, mechanical properties decreased.
0.25 phr CAGRP improves 40.3% flexural, and18.7% tensile strengths.
FESEM, FTIR reveal strong interfacial adhesion between nanofillers and epoxy.
GO‐H has proven to be an inexpensive reinforcement for polymer nanocomposites.
Comparative Study on Mechanical Properties Enhancement of GFRP‐Coal‐Derived Graphene Oxide Composites with Halloysite Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pc.28694</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2449-8864</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-8397 |
ispartof | Polymer composites, 2024-10, Vol.45 (14), p.13164-13179 |
issn | 0272-8397 1548-0569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3111433099 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adhesive strength Anthracite Clay coal‐derived GO Comparative studies Composite materials Cost analysis Epoxy resins Flexural strength Glass fiber reinforced plastics Glass-epoxy composites Graphene halloysite nanotubes Impact strength Mechanical properties Multi wall carbon nanotubes multiwalled carbon nanotubes Nanocomposites Polymers Tensile strength VARIM |
title | Enhancement in mechanical properties of GFRP‐coal‐derived graphene oxide composites by addition of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and halloysite nanotubes: A comparative study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A15%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancement%20in%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20GFRP%E2%80%90coal%E2%80%90derived%20graphene%20oxide%20composites%20by%20addition%20of%20multiwalled%20carbon%20nanotubes%20and%20halloysite%20nanotubes:%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20composites&rft.au=Garg,%20Anushka&rft.date=2024-10-10&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=13164&rft.epage=13179&rft.pages=13164-13179&rft.issn=0272-8397&rft.eissn=1548-0569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pc.28694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111433099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-58e1c3c729321007a0822ade3248a8e0e798c33e12c5f560e17852a0be4db6b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111433099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |