Zircon U‐Pb provenance analysis of impact melt and target rocks from the Rochechouart impact structure, France

• Published in: Meteoritics & planetary science 2024-10, Vol.59 (10), p.2718-2743
• Main Authors: Guerrero, Daniela, Reimold, Wolf Uwe, Hauser, Natalia, Figueiredo, Igor, Kenni, Lucas, Lambert, Philippe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Basements; Carboniferous; Evolution; Geochronology; Geological history; Geology; Impact analysis; Impact melts; Jurassic; Massifs; Ordovician; Orogeny; Permian; Radiometric dating; Rocks; Zircon
• ISSN: 1086-9379; 1945-5100
• DOI: 10.1111/maps.14247

The Rochechouart impact structure in the northwestern part of the French Massif Central (FMC) has a great diversity of impactites, including monomict impact breccias, suevite, and impact melt rocks (IMRs). The structure is strongly eroded, which allows the study of impactites of the crater fill and the transition into the crater floor. The FMC has had a multistage geological evolution from the late Neoproterozoic to the Ordovician (600–450 Ma) until the later stages of the Variscan orogeny (~300 Ma). Previous geochronological work on Rochechouart has been focused mainly on the impactites and constraining the impact age, and scarce work has been done on the FMC‐related target rocks. Here, U‐Pb isotope analysis by LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS has been conducted on zircon from two IMRs from the Recoudert and Montoume localities, and from a monzodiorite, a paragneiss, and two amphibolite samples of the basement to the impact structure. Zircon from the target rocks yielded mainly Neoproterozoic to Carboniferous ages (~924 to ~301 Ma) that can mostly be correlated to different stages of the geological evolution of the FMC. The monzodiorite also yielded a Permian age of 272 ± 12 Ma. Zircon from the IMRs, and especially from the Montoume sample, gave a comparatively higher diversity of Neoproterozoic to Jurassic ages (~552 to ~195 Ma). Provenance analysis for the zircon age populations of the impactites compared to those of the basement rocks shows overall poor correlation between the two age groups. This suggests that other target lithologies were involved in the formation of these impact melts as well. Post‐Variscan and preimpact ages (281–226 Ma) obtained for both melt rocks probably reflect a previously unconstrained event in the evolution of the regional geological history. Ages similar to the currently most widely accepted impact age of ~204–206 Ma were obtained from both IMR samples. In addition, the Montoume melt rock yielded several post‐204 Ma ages, which might reflect a to date unconstrained, about 194 Ma postimpact thermal/hydrothermal event.