Loading…

Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia

Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of water and climate change 2024-09, Vol.15 (9), p.4199-4219
Main Authors: Bekele Mena, Nahom, Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu, Chora, Henok Gubula, Dada, Teka Tadesse
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103
container_end_page 4219
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4199
container_title Journal of water and climate change
container_volume 15
creator Bekele Mena, Nahom
Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu
Chora, Henok Gubula
Dada, Teka Tadesse
description Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wcc.2024.645
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3115515660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115515660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp3_oCA207Ne9JlKfWBBRfqOqSZxE6ZJjXJOPTfm6FeLpzL5XAOfADcY7QgWIjHwZgFQYQtBONXYEIYktWScnZdbsRQRQhjt2CW0gGV4XxJkZyAsErJptT6b5j3FlrnrMkwOBh1Hp-mj78W9t7YmHXr8xm2HqYcrT66Lgwwtce-K9bgYdm3vnMBDjrbmPa2mcOP0JfY6OEm79twavUduHG6S3b2r1Pw9bT5XL9U2_fn1_VqWxksZa6orIV2NccGiwZppjWhhPGdQ7RGltBd02jXiKURtZGYEYYt0UzWOyKKYkSn4OGSe4rhp7cpq0Pooy-VimLMOeZCjK75xWViSClap06xPep4VhipkaoqVNVIVRWq9A8GMGuK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115515660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bekele Mena, Nahom ; Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu ; Chora, Henok Gubula ; Dada, Teka Tadesse</creator><creatorcontrib>Bekele Mena, Nahom ; Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu ; Chora, Henok Gubula ; Dada, Teka Tadesse</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-2244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2408-9354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2024.645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Artificial intelligence ; Basins ; Decision making ; Discharge ; Flood peak ; High flow ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Investigations ; Neural networks ; Rainfall ; Resampling ; Resource management ; Simulation ; Simulation models ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streamflow data ; Time series ; Uncertainty ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of water and climate change, 2024-09, Vol.15 (9), p.4199-4219</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-6533-3918</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bekele Mena, Nahom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chora, Henok Gubula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dada, Teka Tadesse</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</title><title>Journal of water and climate change</title><description>Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Flood peak</subject><subject>High flow</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resampling</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation models</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow data</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2040-2244</issn><issn>2408-9354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp3_oCA207Ne9JlKfWBBRfqOqSZxE6ZJjXJOPTfm6FeLpzL5XAOfADcY7QgWIjHwZgFQYQtBONXYEIYktWScnZdbsRQRQhjt2CW0gGV4XxJkZyAsErJptT6b5j3FlrnrMkwOBh1Hp-mj78W9t7YmHXr8xm2HqYcrT66Lgwwtce-K9bgYdm3vnMBDjrbmPa2mcOP0JfY6OEm79twavUduHG6S3b2r1Pw9bT5XL9U2_fn1_VqWxksZa6orIV2NccGiwZppjWhhPGdQ7RGltBd02jXiKURtZGYEYYt0UzWOyKKYkSn4OGSe4rhp7cpq0Pooy-VimLMOeZCjK75xWViSClap06xPep4VhipkaoqVNVIVRWq9A8GMGuK</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Bekele Mena, Nahom</creator><creator>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</creator><creator>Chora, Henok Gubula</creator><creator>Dada, Teka Tadesse</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6533-3918</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</title><author>Bekele Mena, Nahom ; Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu ; Chora, Henok Gubula ; Dada, Teka Tadesse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Flood peak</topic><topic>High flow</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resampling</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation models</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow data</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bekele Mena, Nahom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chora, Henok Gubula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dada, Teka Tadesse</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of water and climate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bekele Mena, Nahom</au><au>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</au><au>Chora, Henok Gubula</au><au>Dada, Teka Tadesse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water and climate change</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4199</spage><epage>4219</epage><pages>4199-4219</pages><issn>2040-2244</issn><eissn>2408-9354</eissn><abstract>Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wcc.2024.645</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6533-3918</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-2244
ispartof Journal of water and climate change, 2024-09, Vol.15 (9), p.4199-4219
issn 2040-2244
2408-9354
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3115515660
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Artificial intelligence
Basins
Decision making
Discharge
Flood peak
High flow
Hydrologic data
Hydrology
Investigations
Neural networks
Rainfall
Resampling
Resource management
Simulation
Simulation models
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streamflow data
Time series
Uncertainty
Water resources
Water resources management
Watersheds
title Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20effect%20of%20rating%20curve%20uncertainty%20in%20streamflow%20simulation%20on%20Kulfo%20watershed,%20Southern%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20and%20climate%20change&rft.au=Bekele%20Mena,%20Nahom&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4199&rft.epage=4219&rft.pages=4199-4219&rft.issn=2040-2244&rft.eissn=2408-9354&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wcc.2024.645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115515660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115515660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true