Loading…
Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia
Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncert...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of water and climate change 2024-09, Vol.15 (9), p.4199-4219 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103 |
container_end_page | 4219 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4199 |
container_title | Journal of water and climate change |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Bekele Mena, Nahom Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu Chora, Henok Gubula Dada, Teka Tadesse |
description | Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wcc.2024.645 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3115515660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115515660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp3_oCA207Ne9JlKfWBBRfqOqSZxE6ZJjXJOPTfm6FeLpzL5XAOfADcY7QgWIjHwZgFQYQtBONXYEIYktWScnZdbsRQRQhjt2CW0gGV4XxJkZyAsErJptT6b5j3FlrnrMkwOBh1Hp-mj78W9t7YmHXr8xm2HqYcrT66Lgwwtce-K9bgYdm3vnMBDjrbmPa2mcOP0JfY6OEm79twavUduHG6S3b2r1Pw9bT5XL9U2_fn1_VqWxksZa6orIV2NccGiwZppjWhhPGdQ7RGltBd02jXiKURtZGYEYYt0UzWOyKKYkSn4OGSe4rhp7cpq0Pooy-VimLMOeZCjK75xWViSClap06xPep4VhipkaoqVNVIVRWq9A8GMGuK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115515660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bekele Mena, Nahom ; Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu ; Chora, Henok Gubula ; Dada, Teka Tadesse</creator><creatorcontrib>Bekele Mena, Nahom ; Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu ; Chora, Henok Gubula ; Dada, Teka Tadesse</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-2244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2408-9354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2024.645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Artificial intelligence ; Basins ; Decision making ; Discharge ; Flood peak ; High flow ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Investigations ; Neural networks ; Rainfall ; Resampling ; Resource management ; Simulation ; Simulation models ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streamflow data ; Time series ; Uncertainty ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of water and climate change, 2024-09, Vol.15 (9), p.4199-4219</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-6533-3918</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bekele Mena, Nahom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chora, Henok Gubula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dada, Teka Tadesse</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</title><title>Journal of water and climate change</title><description>Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Flood peak</subject><subject>High flow</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resampling</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation models</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow data</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2040-2244</issn><issn>2408-9354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGp3_oCA207Ne9JlKfWBBRfqOqSZxE6ZJjXJOPTfm6FeLpzL5XAOfADcY7QgWIjHwZgFQYQtBONXYEIYktWScnZdbsRQRQhjt2CW0gGV4XxJkZyAsErJptT6b5j3FlrnrMkwOBh1Hp-mj78W9t7YmHXr8xm2HqYcrT66Lgwwtce-K9bgYdm3vnMBDjrbmPa2mcOP0JfY6OEm79twavUduHG6S3b2r1Pw9bT5XL9U2_fn1_VqWxksZa6orIV2NccGiwZppjWhhPGdQ7RGltBd02jXiKURtZGYEYYt0UzWOyKKYkSn4OGSe4rhp7cpq0Pooy-VimLMOeZCjK75xWViSClap06xPep4VhipkaoqVNVIVRWq9A8GMGuK</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Bekele Mena, Nahom</creator><creator>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</creator><creator>Chora, Henok Gubula</creator><creator>Dada, Teka Tadesse</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6533-3918</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</title><author>Bekele Mena, Nahom ; Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu ; Chora, Henok Gubula ; Dada, Teka Tadesse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Flood peak</topic><topic>High flow</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resampling</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation models</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow data</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bekele Mena, Nahom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chora, Henok Gubula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dada, Teka Tadesse</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of water and climate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bekele Mena, Nahom</au><au>Ayele, Elias Gebeyehu</au><au>Chora, Henok Gubula</au><au>Dada, Teka Tadesse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water and climate change</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4199</spage><epage>4219</epage><pages>4199-4219</pages><issn>2040-2244</issn><eissn>2408-9354</eissn><abstract>Accurate streamflow simulation and comprehending its associated uncertainty are crucial for effective water resource management. However, the uncertainty of rating curves from which streamflow data is derived remains poorly understood. This study aims to simulate streamflow under rating curve uncertainty conditions. The bootstrap resampling technique (BSRT) was used to establish the rating curve and estimate associated uncertainty. Furthermore, it integrated with standalone and hybrid models (GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Conv1D-LSTM), to assess the effect of this uncertainty on streamflow simulation. Different lag times of rainfall and discharge are used as input for DL streamflow simulation models. Despite the complexity, the Conv1D-LSTM model did not outperform the Bi-LSTM model. However, it slightly outperforms the GRU model. Moreover, the rating curve uncertainty significantly propagates to streamflow simulation, particularly in high-flow regions. Consequently, the uncertainties related to rating curves on the Kulfo River led to a streamflow uncertainty of about 17.8 m3 s−1, representing 22% at peak discharge. The performance of the DL models was evaluated using different metrics (RMSE, MAE, NSE, and R2). The findings underscore the importance of considering rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation to enhance water resource management practices and support informed decision-making in the study area.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wcc.2024.645</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6533-3918</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2040-2244 |
ispartof | Journal of water and climate change, 2024-09, Vol.15 (9), p.4199-4219 |
issn | 2040-2244 2408-9354 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3115515660 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Artificial intelligence Basins Decision making Discharge Flood peak High flow Hydrologic data Hydrology Investigations Neural networks Rainfall Resampling Resource management Simulation Simulation models Stream discharge Stream flow Streamflow data Time series Uncertainty Water resources Water resources management Watersheds |
title | Assessing the effect of rating curve uncertainty in streamflow simulation on Kulfo watershed, Southern Ethiopia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20effect%20of%20rating%20curve%20uncertainty%20in%20streamflow%20simulation%20on%20Kulfo%20watershed,%20Southern%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20and%20climate%20change&rft.au=Bekele%20Mena,%20Nahom&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4199&rft.epage=4219&rft.pages=4199-4219&rft.issn=2040-2244&rft.eissn=2408-9354&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wcc.2024.645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115515660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-3876af751c16d0a4aa23245bf0370e23bddafd69c67c814241e2a487b262a4103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115515660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |