Loading…
CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH JUSTICE: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS
In theory, children in conflict with the law have the legal right to have their opinions taken into account and are entitled to contribute to a criminal justice system's response to their own behaviour (see United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), 2007; 2008). Indeed, the UN...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of community justice 2024-01, Vol.19 (2), p.1-3 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 3 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | British journal of community justice |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Smithson, Hannah Creaney, Sean Parkes, Ruth |
description | In theory, children in conflict with the law have the legal right to have their opinions taken into account and are entitled to contribute to a criminal justice system's response to their own behaviour (see United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), 2007; 2008). Indeed, the UNCRC General Comment No 24 (2019) reflects developments that have occurred since 2007 with effective participation in justice proceedings (art. 40 (2) (b) (iv)) stating that 'a child who is above the minimum age of criminal responsibility should be considered competent to participate throughout the child justice process.' Pivotal to this is a commitment to ensure that children are provided with meaningful opportunities to participate in inclusive and collaborative decision-making processes (Creaney and Burns, 2024; Peer Power / YJB, 2021). However, in practice, systemic neglect of children's views and an inability to view children as capable co-producers pervades contemporary youth justice systems and practices (Smithson and Gray, 2021; Burns and Creaney, 2023). Whilst a 'participatory rights-compliant' culture should be central to the ethos of how children are responded to, institutional and structural barriers may inhibit opportunities for them to input into processes or exercise agency. The adage 'actions speak louder than words' is used in this special edition to emphasise the point that there needs to be much more of a focus on how children's participation is translated into policy and practice. For instance, the terms child first, child participation, children's voice, and co-production are used interchangeably with little thought as to what they mean for youth justice practice 'on the ground'. The papers in this issue critique models of youth participation and offer insight into how professionals can embrace children's voices in youth justice and wider services. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3116378034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3116378034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_31163780343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDE31TUwMrfkYOAqLs4yMDAzNDQ05mTwcvbw9HEJcvVTD1YIcAwK8XT2DHAM8fT3U_D0U4j0Dw3xUPAKDQYKu1opODqDJIIVggNcHb0VfPxDXVyDFEI8HP0Uwv2DXIJ5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre2NDQzNjcwsDYxJg4VQCeFTTD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116378034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH JUSTICE: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Smithson, Hannah ; Creaney, Sean ; Parkes, Ruth</creator><creatorcontrib>Smithson, Hannah ; Creaney, Sean ; Parkes, Ruth</creatorcontrib><description>In theory, children in conflict with the law have the legal right to have their opinions taken into account and are entitled to contribute to a criminal justice system's response to their own behaviour (see United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), 2007; 2008). Indeed, the UNCRC General Comment No 24 (2019) reflects developments that have occurred since 2007 with effective participation in justice proceedings (art. 40 (2) (b) (iv)) stating that 'a child who is above the minimum age of criminal responsibility should be considered competent to participate throughout the child justice process.' Pivotal to this is a commitment to ensure that children are provided with meaningful opportunities to participate in inclusive and collaborative decision-making processes (Creaney and Burns, 2024; Peer Power / YJB, 2021). However, in practice, systemic neglect of children's views and an inability to view children as capable co-producers pervades contemporary youth justice systems and practices (Smithson and Gray, 2021; Burns and Creaney, 2023). Whilst a 'participatory rights-compliant' culture should be central to the ethos of how children are responded to, institutional and structural barriers may inhibit opportunities for them to input into processes or exercise agency. The adage 'actions speak louder than words' is used in this special edition to emphasise the point that there needs to be much more of a focus on how children's participation is translated into policy and practice. For instance, the terms child first, child participation, children's voice, and co-production are used interchangeably with little thought as to what they mean for youth justice practice 'on the ground'. The papers in this issue critique models of youth participation and offer insight into how professionals can embrace children's voices in youth justice and wider services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-0279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sheffield: British Journal of Community Justice</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Childrens rights ; Collaboration ; Juvenile justice ; Mentors ; Participation</subject><ispartof>British journal of community justice, 2024-01, Vol.19 (2), p.1-3</ispartof><rights>Copyright British Journal of Community Justice 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3116378034/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3116378034?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21376,21394,33611,33769,43733,43814,74221,74310</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smithson, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creaney, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkes, Ruth</creatorcontrib><title>CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH JUSTICE: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS</title><title>British journal of community justice</title><description>In theory, children in conflict with the law have the legal right to have their opinions taken into account and are entitled to contribute to a criminal justice system's response to their own behaviour (see United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), 2007; 2008). Indeed, the UNCRC General Comment No 24 (2019) reflects developments that have occurred since 2007 with effective participation in justice proceedings (art. 40 (2) (b) (iv)) stating that 'a child who is above the minimum age of criminal responsibility should be considered competent to participate throughout the child justice process.' Pivotal to this is a commitment to ensure that children are provided with meaningful opportunities to participate in inclusive and collaborative decision-making processes (Creaney and Burns, 2024; Peer Power / YJB, 2021). However, in practice, systemic neglect of children's views and an inability to view children as capable co-producers pervades contemporary youth justice systems and practices (Smithson and Gray, 2021; Burns and Creaney, 2023). Whilst a 'participatory rights-compliant' culture should be central to the ethos of how children are responded to, institutional and structural barriers may inhibit opportunities for them to input into processes or exercise agency. The adage 'actions speak louder than words' is used in this special edition to emphasise the point that there needs to be much more of a focus on how children's participation is translated into policy and practice. For instance, the terms child first, child participation, children's voice, and co-production are used interchangeably with little thought as to what they mean for youth justice practice 'on the ground'. The papers in this issue critique models of youth participation and offer insight into how professionals can embrace children's voices in youth justice and wider services.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Childrens rights</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Participation</subject><issn>1475-0279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDE31TUwMrfkYOAqLs4yMDAzNDQ05mTwcvbw9HEJcvVTD1YIcAwK8XT2DHAM8fT3U_D0U4j0Dw3xUPAKDQYKu1opODqDJIIVggNcHb0VfPxDXVyDFEI8HP0Uwv2DXIJ5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre2NDQzNjcwsDYxJg4VQCeFTTD</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Smithson, Hannah</creator><creator>Creaney, Sean</creator><creator>Parkes, Ruth</creator><general>British Journal of Community Justice</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH JUSTICE: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS</title><author>Smithson, Hannah ; Creaney, Sean ; Parkes, Ruth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31163780343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Childrens rights</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Participation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smithson, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creaney, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkes, Ruth</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>British journal of community justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smithson, Hannah</au><au>Creaney, Sean</au><au>Parkes, Ruth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH JUSTICE: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS</atitle><jtitle>British journal of community justice</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>1-3</pages><issn>1475-0279</issn><abstract>In theory, children in conflict with the law have the legal right to have their opinions taken into account and are entitled to contribute to a criminal justice system's response to their own behaviour (see United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), 2007; 2008). Indeed, the UNCRC General Comment No 24 (2019) reflects developments that have occurred since 2007 with effective participation in justice proceedings (art. 40 (2) (b) (iv)) stating that 'a child who is above the minimum age of criminal responsibility should be considered competent to participate throughout the child justice process.' Pivotal to this is a commitment to ensure that children are provided with meaningful opportunities to participate in inclusive and collaborative decision-making processes (Creaney and Burns, 2024; Peer Power / YJB, 2021). However, in practice, systemic neglect of children's views and an inability to view children as capable co-producers pervades contemporary youth justice systems and practices (Smithson and Gray, 2021; Burns and Creaney, 2023). Whilst a 'participatory rights-compliant' culture should be central to the ethos of how children are responded to, institutional and structural barriers may inhibit opportunities for them to input into processes or exercise agency. The adage 'actions speak louder than words' is used in this special edition to emphasise the point that there needs to be much more of a focus on how children's participation is translated into policy and practice. For instance, the terms child first, child participation, children's voice, and co-production are used interchangeably with little thought as to what they mean for youth justice practice 'on the ground'. The papers in this issue critique models of youth participation and offer insight into how professionals can embrace children's voices in youth justice and wider services.</abstract><cop>Sheffield</cop><pub>British Journal of Community Justice</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1475-0279 |
ispartof | British journal of community justice, 2024-01, Vol.19 (2), p.1-3 |
issn | 1475-0279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3116378034 |
source | Criminology Collection; Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Behavior Childrens rights Collaboration Juvenile justice Mentors Participation |
title | CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN YOUTH JUSTICE: ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CHILDREN'S%20PARTICIPATION%20IN%20YOUTH%20JUSTICE:%20ACTIONS%20SPEAK%20LOUDER%20THAN%20WORDS&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20community%20justice&rft.au=Smithson,%20Hannah&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=1-3&rft.issn=1475-0279&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3116378034%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31163780343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116378034&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |