Volatile capital flows and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of transparency

The study set out to investigate whether transparency can mitigate the negative effects volatile capital flows have on growth using cross-section panel data from 21 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2019. Using the IVQR model, the study finds that at 75th quantile, poor growth performance i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Empirical economics 2024-10, Vol.67 (4), p.1801-1827
Main Authors: Odo, Augustine C., Urama, Nathaniel E., Odionye, Joseph Chukwudi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Capital movement
Central banks
Debt
Econometrics
Economic crisis
Economic growth
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Finance
Foreign investment
Insurance
Management
Panel data
Portfolio investments
Statistics for Business
Transparency
Volatility
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study set out to investigate whether transparency can mitigate the negative effects volatile capital flows have on growth using cross-section panel data from 21 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2019. Using the IVQR model, the study finds that at 75th quantile, poor growth performance in SSA is explained mostly by the volatility in debt net inflows compared to other categories of capital, while portfolio net inflow contributes most significantly to the low-level growth for low and medium income countries. Focusing on the interaction between transparency and capital net inflows, the study finds evidence that transparency reduces most of the negative effects of the volatility in debt net inflow compared to other categories of capital inflow. Thus, the study provides evidence that transparency can reduce the negative effects of volatile capital inflows on growth by a significant amount, which varies depending on the type of capital inflow. The implication is that the extent transparency dampens the negative impact of volatile capital flows depend on both the capital type and the level of income of the country concerned. Regarding FDI and FPI, transparency is most effective in reducing volatility of the flow for low income countries, while for debt flows transparency penalizes the volatility of flows for high income countries. On this basis, it recommends that central banks should adopt transparency as a policy tool, particularly in SSA economies with probably low initial transparency to help mitigate the harmful effects of large and volatile capital inflows.
ISSN:0377-7332
1435-8921
DOI:10.1007/s00181-024-02592-1