Mapping and assessment of ecological vulnerability to wildfires in Europe

• Published in: Fire ecology 2024-12, Vol.20 (1), p.98, Article 98
• Main Authors: Arrogante-Funes, Fátima, Mouillot, Florent, Moreira, Bruno, Aguado, Inmaculada, Chuvieco, Emilio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Boreal forests; Coniferous forests; Conservation status; Dynamic models; Ecology; Ecosystems; Environmental impact; Environmental policy; Fire prevention; Fire resistance; Forest management; Forestry; Forests; Grasslands; Life Sciences; Mixed forests; Natural disturbance; Nutrient cycles; Original Research; Plants (botany); Policies; Recovery of function; Recovery time; Tundra; Vegetation; Wildfires
• ISSN: 1933-9747; 1933-9747
• DOI: 10.1186/s42408-024-00321-8

Background Wildfires play a significant and complex role in ecosystems, influencing various aspects of their functioning and structure. These natural disturbances can positively and negatively impact ecosystems, shaping landscapes, nutrient cycles, biodiversity, and ecological processes. This study focuses on assessing and integrating the different factors that affect the ecological vulnerability to wildfires at the European scale. Our methodology follows three steps. Firstly, ecological values based on biological distinctiveness and conservation status were estimated to understand pre-fire conditions better. Secondly, we obtain vegetation’s coping capacity (or resistance) to the impacts of fire, considering the functional traits of plants and fire characteristics through a fire extreme scenario. Finally, post-fire recovery time was calculated by considering the species-specific recovery time, recovery starting time, growth recovery rate, and the environmental constraints affecting the optimal vegetation response. These three variables were combined using a dynamic model that assumed the change of value due to wildfires integrated throughout the recovery time. Results Our results indicate that the tundra biome emerges as the most ecologically vulnerable to fire, primarily due to its high ecological values and long recovery time, which outweigh its moderate coping capacity. Following closely, the temperate conifer forests also exhibit high vulnerability driven by their high recovery time, despite moderate ecological and coping capacity values. The boreal forests rank next, with moderate vulnerability due to their long recovery time and moderate coping capacity. The Mediterranean region, although having moderate ecological values and recovery time, shows a notable vulnerability influenced by lower coping capacity. The temperate broadleaf and mixed forests demonstrate relatively lower vulnerability owing to their balanced ecological values, moderate recovery time, and substantial coping capacity. Lastly, the temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands are the least vulnerable, benefiting from lower ecological values and the fastest recovery time, alongside moderate coping capacity, which collectively reduce their overall fire vulnerability. Furthermore, we found that coping capacity is the factor that most influenced ecological vulnerability to wildfires. Conclusions The study identifies key zones for European or national policies on fire prevention and po