Loading…
Conceptual Complexity About Return Migration of Refugees/Asylum Seekers
Return migration is one of the complex categories of migration, which becomes even more complicated in the context of refugees’ return to their country of origin. A plethora of terms is used to describe the return of refugees/asylum seekers, having strong political and policy relevance. To unpack th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden) 2024-11, Vol.59 (7), p.2125-2138 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-3948f3474eeacd146bc691664f3c9180d68f568e390ad49019ef4946caf176883 |
container_end_page | 2138 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2125 |
container_title | Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep |
description | Return migration is one of the complex categories of migration, which becomes even more complicated in the context of refugees’ return to their country of origin. A plethora of terms is used to describe the return of refugees/asylum seekers, having strong political and policy relevance. To unpack the features and drivers of conceptual complexity, I propose three interrelated arguments. The first is that labelling – the choice of one concept over another – in return migration often depends on who uses the term (e.g. scholars, policymakers, practitioners, migrants) and in which part of the world. The second argument is that return, similar to binaries in other areas of migration, is often associated with binaries, such as voluntary and forced return. Despite policy categories that reiterate the ‘voluntary’ character of return, the actual practices rarely confirm that return is voluntary and often remain in grey areas, as the emerging literature on bordering practices shows. The third argument is that there are multiple levels at which labelling and binaries are constructed in relation to each other. The identifiable scales include the academic level, the policy level and the migrants themselves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00219096241283651 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3118309586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00219096241283651</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3118309586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-3948f3474eeacd146bc691664f3c9180d68f568e390ad49019ef4946caf176883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9LwzAQx4MoOKd_gG8Fn7vlmjRNHkfRTZgI_nguWXoZnd1SkxTcf29HBR_Ep-PuPt_vHV9CboHOAIpiTmkGiiqRccgkEzmckQkUPE-znMlzMjnt0xNwSa5C2NGhZ0xMyLJ0B4Nd7HWblG7ftfjVxGOy2Lg-Ji8Ye39Inpqt17Fxh8TZYWb7LWKYL8Kx7ffJK-IH-nBNLqxuA9781Cl5f7h_K1fp-nn5WC7WqQHFY8oUl5bxgiNqUwMXGyMUCMEtMwokrYW0uZDIFNU1VxQUWq64MNpCIaRkU3I3-nbeffYYYrVzw4_DyYoBSEZVLsVAwUgZ70LwaKvON3vtjxXQ6pRX9SevQTMbNUFv8df1f8E3yh9pHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118309586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conceptual Complexity About Return Migration of Refugees/Asylum Seekers</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</creator><creatorcontrib>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><description>Return migration is one of the complex categories of migration, which becomes even more complicated in the context of refugees’ return to their country of origin. A plethora of terms is used to describe the return of refugees/asylum seekers, having strong political and policy relevance. To unpack the features and drivers of conceptual complexity, I propose three interrelated arguments. The first is that labelling – the choice of one concept over another – in return migration often depends on who uses the term (e.g. scholars, policymakers, practitioners, migrants) and in which part of the world. The second argument is that return, similar to binaries in other areas of migration, is often associated with binaries, such as voluntary and forced return. Despite policy categories that reiterate the ‘voluntary’ character of return, the actual practices rarely confirm that return is voluntary and often remain in grey areas, as the emerging literature on bordering practices shows. The third argument is that there are multiple levels at which labelling and binaries are constructed in relation to each other. The identifiable scales include the academic level, the policy level and the migrants themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-2538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00219096241283651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Classification ; Country of origin ; Debates ; Immigration policy ; Labelling ; Migrants ; Migration ; Policy making ; Political asylum ; Refugees ; Return migration ; Voluntary</subject><ispartof>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden), 2024-11, Vol.59 (7), p.2125-2138</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-3948f3474eeacd146bc691664f3c9180d68f568e390ad49019ef4946caf176883</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6676-8579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33773,79235</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><title>Conceptual Complexity About Return Migration of Refugees/Asylum Seekers</title><title>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</title><description>Return migration is one of the complex categories of migration, which becomes even more complicated in the context of refugees’ return to their country of origin. A plethora of terms is used to describe the return of refugees/asylum seekers, having strong political and policy relevance. To unpack the features and drivers of conceptual complexity, I propose three interrelated arguments. The first is that labelling – the choice of one concept over another – in return migration often depends on who uses the term (e.g. scholars, policymakers, practitioners, migrants) and in which part of the world. The second argument is that return, similar to binaries in other areas of migration, is often associated with binaries, such as voluntary and forced return. Despite policy categories that reiterate the ‘voluntary’ character of return, the actual practices rarely confirm that return is voluntary and often remain in grey areas, as the emerging literature on bordering practices shows. The third argument is that there are multiple levels at which labelling and binaries are constructed in relation to each other. The identifiable scales include the academic level, the policy level and the migrants themselves.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Country of origin</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Immigration policy</subject><subject>Labelling</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political asylum</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Return migration</subject><subject>Voluntary</subject><issn>0021-9096</issn><issn>1745-2538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9LwzAQx4MoOKd_gG8Fn7vlmjRNHkfRTZgI_nguWXoZnd1SkxTcf29HBR_Ep-PuPt_vHV9CboHOAIpiTmkGiiqRccgkEzmckQkUPE-znMlzMjnt0xNwSa5C2NGhZ0xMyLJ0B4Nd7HWblG7ftfjVxGOy2Lg-Ji8Ye39Inpqt17Fxh8TZYWb7LWKYL8Kx7ffJK-IH-nBNLqxuA9781Cl5f7h_K1fp-nn5WC7WqQHFY8oUl5bxgiNqUwMXGyMUCMEtMwokrYW0uZDIFNU1VxQUWq64MNpCIaRkU3I3-nbeffYYYrVzw4_DyYoBSEZVLsVAwUgZ70LwaKvON3vtjxXQ6pRX9SevQTMbNUFv8df1f8E3yh9pHw</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-8579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Conceptual Complexity About Return Migration of Refugees/Asylum Seekers</title><author>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-3948f3474eeacd146bc691664f3c9180d68f568e390ad49019ef4946caf176883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Country of origin</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Immigration policy</topic><topic>Labelling</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political asylum</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Return migration</topic><topic>Voluntary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şahin-Mencütek, Zeynep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conceptual Complexity About Return Migration of Refugees/Asylum Seekers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2125</spage><epage>2138</epage><pages>2125-2138</pages><issn>0021-9096</issn><eissn>1745-2538</eissn><abstract>Return migration is one of the complex categories of migration, which becomes even more complicated in the context of refugees’ return to their country of origin. A plethora of terms is used to describe the return of refugees/asylum seekers, having strong political and policy relevance. To unpack the features and drivers of conceptual complexity, I propose three interrelated arguments. The first is that labelling – the choice of one concept over another – in return migration often depends on who uses the term (e.g. scholars, policymakers, practitioners, migrants) and in which part of the world. The second argument is that return, similar to binaries in other areas of migration, is often associated with binaries, such as voluntary and forced return. Despite policy categories that reiterate the ‘voluntary’ character of return, the actual practices rarely confirm that return is voluntary and often remain in grey areas, as the emerging literature on bordering practices shows. The third argument is that there are multiple levels at which labelling and binaries are constructed in relation to each other. The identifiable scales include the academic level, the policy level and the migrants themselves.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00219096241283651</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-8579</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9096 |
ispartof | Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden), 2024-11, Vol.59 (7), p.2125-2138 |
issn | 0021-9096 1745-2538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3118309586 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Classification Country of origin Debates Immigration policy Labelling Migrants Migration Policy making Political asylum Refugees Return migration Voluntary |
title | Conceptual Complexity About Return Migration of Refugees/Asylum Seekers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conceptual%20Complexity%20About%20Return%20Migration%20of%20Refugees/Asylum%20Seekers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Asian%20and%20African%20studies%20(Leiden)&rft.au=%C5%9Eahin-Menc%C3%BCtek,%20Zeynep&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2125&rft.epage=2138&rft.pages=2125-2138&rft.issn=0021-9096&rft.eissn=1745-2538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00219096241283651&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118309586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c194t-3948f3474eeacd146bc691664f3c9180d68f568e390ad49019ef4946caf176883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118309586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00219096241283651&rfr_iscdi=true |