Loading…

Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor

Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolutionary intelligence 2024, Vol.17 (5-6), p.3225-3240
Main Authors: Ata, Baris, Gencal, Mashar Cenk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3
container_end_page 3240
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 3225
container_title Evolutionary intelligence
container_volume 17
creator Ata, Baris
Gencal, Mashar Cenk
description Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3118466784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3118466784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULFOwzAQtRBIlMIPMEViDpwd20lGVAFFqsQCs3W1neDSxqmdDOXrcQmCDXnwu7v33ukeIdcUbilAeRcpAylyYDwHqFmVixMyo5XkuahpefqLoT4nFzFuACSDks_IfuF3PQYXfZf5JvP94HbuEweXauz74FG_25ilaus6iyHbj2hCmuss2Hbc4uBDZmx0bZc1CQ4BN1an5uEI9Yfr2qMvTjqfBpfkrMFttFc__5y8PT68Lpb56uXpeXG_ynVB-ZBbIXANomE1oxRlY0pKawtGVGuKhoIwBdYc1ukhK42EugEjy0IyxiuudTEnN5NvOmI_2jiojR9Dl1aqgtKKS1lWPLHYxNLBxxhso_rgdhgOioI6RqumaFWKVn1Hq0QSFZMoJnLX2vBn_Y_qC42hffo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118466784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ata, Baris ; Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ata, Baris ; Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creatorcontrib><description>Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1864-5909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-5917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Applications of Mathematics ; Artificial Intelligence ; Bioinformatics ; Control ; Controllers ; Design optimization ; Engineering ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Evolutionary computation ; Genetic algorithms ; Linear quadratic regulator ; Mathematical and Computational Engineering ; Mechatronics ; Nonlinear control ; Nonlinear systems ; Optimization algorithms ; Particle swarm optimization ; Research Paper ; Robotics ; Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems ; Trajectory optimization ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Unmanned helicopters ; Weighting</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary intelligence, 2024, Vol.17 (5-6), p.3225-3240</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4773-0564 ; 0000-0002-1317-3950</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ata, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</title><title>Evolutionary intelligence</title><addtitle>Evol. Intel</addtitle><description>Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.</description><subject>Applications of Mathematics</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Evolutionary computation</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Linear quadratic regulator</subject><subject>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Nonlinear control</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Trajectory optimization</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Unmanned helicopters</subject><subject>Weighting</subject><issn>1864-5909</issn><issn>1864-5917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ULFOwzAQtRBIlMIPMEViDpwd20lGVAFFqsQCs3W1neDSxqmdDOXrcQmCDXnwu7v33ukeIdcUbilAeRcpAylyYDwHqFmVixMyo5XkuahpefqLoT4nFzFuACSDks_IfuF3PQYXfZf5JvP94HbuEweXauz74FG_25ilaus6iyHbj2hCmuss2Hbc4uBDZmx0bZc1CQ4BN1an5uEI9Yfr2qMvTjqfBpfkrMFttFc__5y8PT68Lpb56uXpeXG_ynVB-ZBbIXANomE1oxRlY0pKawtGVGuKhoIwBdYc1ukhK42EugEjy0IyxiuudTEnN5NvOmI_2jiojR9Dl1aqgtKKS1lWPLHYxNLBxxhso_rgdhgOioI6RqumaFWKVn1Hq0QSFZMoJnLX2vBn_Y_qC42hffo</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Ata, Baris</creator><creator>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4773-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-3950</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</title><author>Ata, Baris ; Gencal, Mashar Cenk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Applications of Mathematics</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Evolutionary computation</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Linear quadratic regulator</topic><topic>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Nonlinear control</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Trajectory optimization</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Unmanned helicopters</topic><topic>Weighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ata, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary intelligence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ata, Baris</au><au>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary intelligence</jtitle><stitle>Evol. Intel</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>3225</spage><epage>3240</epage><pages>3225-3240</pages><issn>1864-5909</issn><eissn>1864-5917</eissn><abstract>Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4773-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-3950</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1864-5909
ispartof Evolutionary intelligence, 2024, Vol.17 (5-6), p.3225-3240
issn 1864-5909
1864-5917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3118466784
source Springer Nature
subjects Applications of Mathematics
Artificial Intelligence
Bioinformatics
Control
Controllers
Design optimization
Engineering
Evolutionary algorithms
Evolutionary computation
Genetic algorithms
Linear quadratic regulator
Mathematical and Computational Engineering
Mechatronics
Nonlinear control
Nonlinear systems
Optimization algorithms
Particle swarm optimization
Research Paper
Robotics
Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems
Trajectory optimization
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Unmanned helicopters
Weighting
title Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A46%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20optimization%20approaches%20on%20linear%20quadratic%20regulator%20design%20for%20trajectory%20tracking%20of%20a%20quadrotor&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20intelligence&rft.au=Ata,%20Baris&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=3225&rft.epage=3240&rft.pages=3225-3240&rft.issn=1864-5909&rft.eissn=1864-5917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118466784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118466784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true