Loading…
Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor
Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Evolutionary intelligence 2024, Vol.17 (5-6), p.3225-3240 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3 |
container_end_page | 3240 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 3225 |
container_title | Evolutionary intelligence |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ata, Baris Gencal, Mashar Cenk |
description | Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3118466784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3118466784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULFOwzAQtRBIlMIPMEViDpwd20lGVAFFqsQCs3W1neDSxqmdDOXrcQmCDXnwu7v33ukeIdcUbilAeRcpAylyYDwHqFmVixMyo5XkuahpefqLoT4nFzFuACSDks_IfuF3PQYXfZf5JvP94HbuEweXauz74FG_25ilaus6iyHbj2hCmuss2Hbc4uBDZmx0bZc1CQ4BN1an5uEI9Yfr2qMvTjqfBpfkrMFttFc__5y8PT68Lpb56uXpeXG_ynVB-ZBbIXANomE1oxRlY0pKawtGVGuKhoIwBdYc1ukhK42EugEjy0IyxiuudTEnN5NvOmI_2jiojR9Dl1aqgtKKS1lWPLHYxNLBxxhso_rgdhgOioI6RqumaFWKVn1Hq0QSFZMoJnLX2vBn_Y_qC42hffo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118466784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ata, Baris ; Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ata, Baris ; Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creatorcontrib><description>Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1864-5909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-5917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Applications of Mathematics ; Artificial Intelligence ; Bioinformatics ; Control ; Controllers ; Design optimization ; Engineering ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Evolutionary computation ; Genetic algorithms ; Linear quadratic regulator ; Mathematical and Computational Engineering ; Mechatronics ; Nonlinear control ; Nonlinear systems ; Optimization algorithms ; Particle swarm optimization ; Research Paper ; Robotics ; Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems ; Trajectory optimization ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Unmanned helicopters ; Weighting</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary intelligence, 2024, Vol.17 (5-6), p.3225-3240</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4773-0564 ; 0000-0002-1317-3950</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ata, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</title><title>Evolutionary intelligence</title><addtitle>Evol. Intel</addtitle><description>Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.</description><subject>Applications of Mathematics</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Evolutionary computation</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Linear quadratic regulator</subject><subject>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Nonlinear control</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Trajectory optimization</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Unmanned helicopters</subject><subject>Weighting</subject><issn>1864-5909</issn><issn>1864-5917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ULFOwzAQtRBIlMIPMEViDpwd20lGVAFFqsQCs3W1neDSxqmdDOXrcQmCDXnwu7v33ukeIdcUbilAeRcpAylyYDwHqFmVixMyo5XkuahpefqLoT4nFzFuACSDks_IfuF3PQYXfZf5JvP94HbuEweXauz74FG_25ilaus6iyHbj2hCmuss2Hbc4uBDZmx0bZc1CQ4BN1an5uEI9Yfr2qMvTjqfBpfkrMFttFc__5y8PT68Lpb56uXpeXG_ynVB-ZBbIXANomE1oxRlY0pKawtGVGuKhoIwBdYc1ukhK42EugEjy0IyxiuudTEnN5NvOmI_2jiojR9Dl1aqgtKKS1lWPLHYxNLBxxhso_rgdhgOioI6RqumaFWKVn1Hq0QSFZMoJnLX2vBn_Y_qC42hffo</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Ata, Baris</creator><creator>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4773-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-3950</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</title><author>Ata, Baris ; Gencal, Mashar Cenk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Applications of Mathematics</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Evolutionary computation</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Linear quadratic regulator</topic><topic>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Nonlinear control</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Trajectory optimization</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Unmanned helicopters</topic><topic>Weighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ata, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary intelligence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ata, Baris</au><au>Gencal, Mashar Cenk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary intelligence</jtitle><stitle>Evol. Intel</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>3225</spage><epage>3240</epage><pages>3225-3240</pages><issn>1864-5909</issn><eissn>1864-5917</eissn><abstract>Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is one of the most prevalent methods used in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles. LQR controllers are commonly employed in the control of both linear and non-linear systems due to their advantages such as easy-to-apply and high-performance structure. However, there is one main difficulty that plays a significant role in the manner of determining the gain for the control signal: choosing appropriate weighting matrices. The selection of these matrices that directly affect the controller performance is generally performed by trial and error, which is laborious and time-consuming. Accordingly, various optimization algorithms have been utilized to determine the weighting matrices of the LQR controller. In this paper, the weighting matrices of the designed LQR controller were obtained using Standard Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithms. The obtained weighting matrices of the LQR controller were tested on an unmanned aerial vehicle simulation, and the performance of optimization algorithms were presented comparatively.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4773-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-3950</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1864-5909 |
ispartof | Evolutionary intelligence, 2024, Vol.17 (5-6), p.3225-3240 |
issn | 1864-5909 1864-5917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3118466784 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Applications of Mathematics Artificial Intelligence Bioinformatics Control Controllers Design optimization Engineering Evolutionary algorithms Evolutionary computation Genetic algorithms Linear quadratic regulator Mathematical and Computational Engineering Mechatronics Nonlinear control Nonlinear systems Optimization algorithms Particle swarm optimization Research Paper Robotics Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems Trajectory optimization Unmanned aerial vehicles Unmanned helicopters Weighting |
title | Comparison of optimization approaches on linear quadratic regulator design for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A46%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20optimization%20approaches%20on%20linear%20quadratic%20regulator%20design%20for%20trajectory%20tracking%20of%20a%20quadrotor&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20intelligence&rft.au=Ata,%20Baris&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=3225&rft.epage=3240&rft.pages=3225-3240&rft.issn=1864-5909&rft.eissn=1864-5917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12065-024-00928-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118466784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-e55ab05f29211a6fd7119e0d58b1ad105d3a940b0b0a27d609f0d673622484cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118466784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |