Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian early childhood education and care staff: Views about source, content and format

• Published in: Health promotion journal of Australia 2024-10, Vol.35 (4), p.1397-1404
• Main Authors: Finch, Meghan, Lum, Melanie, Yoong, Sze Lin, Hodder, Rebecca K., Grady, Alice, Wolfenden, Luke
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Australia; child day care centres; Child, Preschool; childcare services; Childhood; Children; Childrens health; Clinical decision making; Clinical outcomes; Cross-Sectional Studies; cross‐sectional survey; Decision making; Departments; Dissemination; Early childhood education; Early Childhood Education and Care; Education; Evaluation; Evidence-Based Practice; evidence‐based decision making; Female; Format; Government agencies; Guidelines; Health promotion; Health research; Health status; Humans; Information Dissemination - methods; Information services; International cooperation; Male; Medical research; Moral and ethical aspects; Polls & surveys; Preferences; Public Health; Public health education; Quality of care; Research transfer; research transfer and uptake; Services; Statistical methods; Supervisor-Subordinate interactions; Surveys; Telephone surveys; Uptake; Workshops
• ISSN: 1036-1073; 2201-1617
• DOI: 10.1002/hpja.820

Issue Addressed: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during August 2021 to March 2022, with a sub-sample of Australian ECEC services participating in a larger survey completed online and via Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. Survey items assessed: influential source for receiving research, type of content that would influence decisions to adopt research and preferred formats for receiving research. Results: Overall, 993 service managers or staff from 1984 (50.0%) invited and eligible services completed the larger survey. Of these, 463 randomly allocated services (46.7%) had staff complete the dissemination items. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority, ECEC agencies and Government Departments were most frequently selected as influential sources of research evidence. Staff were most interested in content providing evidence-based recommendations for future actions and descriptions of health issues addressed. Workshops or conferences and webinars were the preferred format for receiving research. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of tailoring dissemination strategies to meet ECEC staff needs and engaging influential sources to disseminate research evidence. So What? Understanding dissemination preferences of ECEC staff is crucial for supporting uptake of evidence-based health promotion in this setting. By developing tailored strategies based on ECEC preferences, research transfer and evidence-based decision making can be supported more effectively. These findings contribute to bridging the evidence-practice gap and improving the quality of care and health outcomes for children in ECEC settings