An Information-Theoretic Approach to Morphosyntactic Complexity in English, Dutch and German

Though equi-complexity of languages has long been an assumption in the study of language, recent research has argued that languages differ with regard to their morphological complexity. Some languages rely more on bound morphology to express grammatical meanings, whereas other languages rely more on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of quantitative linguistics 2024-10, Vol.31 (4), p.275-297
Main Authors: Nijs, Julie, Van de Velde, Freek, Cuyckens, Hubert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bible
Dutch language
English language
German language
Information theory
Language contact
Literary translation
Morphological complexity
Morphology
Morphosyntax
West Germanic languages
Word order
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Though equi-complexity of languages has long been an assumption in the study of language, recent research has argued that languages differ with regard to their morphological complexity. Some languages rely more on bound morphology to express grammatical meanings, whereas other languages rely more on lexical or word-order-based strategies. It is a moot point to what extent these differences correlate with demographic factors such as population size and language contact, and how complexity should be measured. In this study, we use information-theory, more specifically Kolmogorov Complexity, to assess morphological and word-order-based strategies and apply the procedure to three West Germanic languages, English, Dutch and German, which have been argued to form a continuum along the morphological complexity cline, plausibly due to different rates of demographic upheaval and concomitant language contact. Tracing the morphological and word-order-based complexity through time in parallel Bible translations, our results show that English is consistently less morphologically complex than its sisters, continuing on its path of morphological simplification. We see a statistically robust trade-off between morphology and word order complexity. We find support for earlier findings in the literature, with the exception of the difference between Dutch and German, which does not transpire in our results.
ISSN:0929-6174
1744-5035
DOI:10.1080/09296174.2024.2374613