Loading…

Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms

We study learning in a dynamically evolving environment modeled as a Markov game between a learner and a strategic opponent that can adapt to the learner's strategies. While most existing works in Markov games focus on external regret as the learning objective, external regret becomes inadequat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-12
Main Authors: Nguyen-Tang, Thanh, Arora, Raman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Nguyen-Tang, Thanh
Arora, Raman
description We study learning in a dynamically evolving environment modeled as a Markov game between a learner and a strategic opponent that can adapt to the learner's strategies. While most existing works in Markov games focus on external regret as the learning objective, external regret becomes inadequate when the adversaries are adaptive. In this work, we focus on \emph{policy regret} -- a counterfactual notion that aims to compete with the return that would have been attained if the learner had followed the best fixed sequence of policy, in hindsight. We show that if the opponent has unbounded memory or if it is non-stationary, then sample-efficient learning is not possible. For memory-bounded and stationary, we show that learning is still statistically hard if the set of feasible strategies for the learner is exponentially large. To guarantee learnability, we introduce a new notion of \emph{consistent} adaptive adversaries, wherein, the adversary responds similarly to similar strategies of the learner. We provide algorithms that achieve \(\sqrt{T}\) policy regret against memory-bounded, stationary, and consistent adversaries.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3123920566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3123920566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_31239205663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1qwkAUhYeCoKjvcMGtgTjTxJ-dlaRdVCile7mYmzgaZ8y9k5S-fWfRB-jqHPi-c57URBuzSjbPWo_VXOSapqnO1zrLzER174TsrGvAOjgi3_wAr3gngW8bLrCv8BHsQLEMxIJsSXbw4Vt7_oFPapjCEsreVXHiArbwghwdliWgq6Coa3u2kcC-bTzHx7vM1KjGVmj-l1O1KIuvw1vyYN_1JOF09T27iE5mpc1Wp1mem_9Zv8ZPSpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3123920566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh ; Arora, Raman</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh ; Arora, Raman</creatorcontrib><description>We study learning in a dynamically evolving environment modeled as a Markov game between a learner and a strategic opponent that can adapt to the learner's strategies. While most existing works in Markov games focus on external regret as the learning objective, external regret becomes inadequate when the adversaries are adaptive. In this work, we focus on \emph{policy regret} -- a counterfactual notion that aims to compete with the return that would have been attained if the learner had followed the best fixed sequence of policy, in hindsight. We show that if the opponent has unbounded memory or if it is non-stationary, then sample-efficient learning is not possible. For memory-bounded and stationary, we show that learning is still statistically hard if the set of feasible strategies for the learner is exponentially large. To guarantee learnability, we introduce a new notion of \emph{consistent} adaptive adversaries, wherein, the adversary responds similarly to similar strategies of the learner. We provide algorithms that achieve \(\sqrt{T}\) policy regret against memory-bounded, stationary, and consistent adversaries.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Games ; Machine learning</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3123920566?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,25731,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Raman</creatorcontrib><title>Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>We study learning in a dynamically evolving environment modeled as a Markov game between a learner and a strategic opponent that can adapt to the learner's strategies. While most existing works in Markov games focus on external regret as the learning objective, external regret becomes inadequate when the adversaries are adaptive. In this work, we focus on \emph{policy regret} -- a counterfactual notion that aims to compete with the return that would have been attained if the learner had followed the best fixed sequence of policy, in hindsight. We show that if the opponent has unbounded memory or if it is non-stationary, then sample-efficient learning is not possible. For memory-bounded and stationary, we show that learning is still statistically hard if the set of feasible strategies for the learner is exponentially large. To guarantee learnability, we introduce a new notion of \emph{consistent} adaptive adversaries, wherein, the adversary responds similarly to similar strategies of the learner. We provide algorithms that achieve \(\sqrt{T}\) policy regret against memory-bounded, stationary, and consistent adversaries.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1qwkAUhYeCoKjvcMGtgTjTxJ-dlaRdVCile7mYmzgaZ8y9k5S-fWfRB-jqHPi-c57URBuzSjbPWo_VXOSapqnO1zrLzER174TsrGvAOjgi3_wAr3gngW8bLrCv8BHsQLEMxIJsSXbw4Vt7_oFPapjCEsreVXHiArbwghwdliWgq6Coa3u2kcC-bTzHx7vM1KjGVmj-l1O1KIuvw1vyYN_1JOF09T27iE5mpc1Wp1mem_9Zv8ZPSpU</recordid><startdate>20241209</startdate><enddate>20241209</enddate><creator>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh</creator><creator>Arora, Raman</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241209</creationdate><title>Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms</title><author>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh ; Arora, Raman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31239205663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Raman</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen-Tang, Thanh</au><au>Arora, Raman</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-12-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>We study learning in a dynamically evolving environment modeled as a Markov game between a learner and a strategic opponent that can adapt to the learner's strategies. While most existing works in Markov games focus on external regret as the learning objective, external regret becomes inadequate when the adversaries are adaptive. In this work, we focus on \emph{policy regret} -- a counterfactual notion that aims to compete with the return that would have been attained if the learner had followed the best fixed sequence of policy, in hindsight. We show that if the opponent has unbounded memory or if it is non-stationary, then sample-efficient learning is not possible. For memory-bounded and stationary, we show that learning is still statistically hard if the set of feasible strategies for the learner is exponentially large. To guarantee learnability, we introduce a new notion of \emph{consistent} adaptive adversaries, wherein, the adversary responds similarly to similar strategies of the learner. We provide algorithms that achieve \(\sqrt{T}\) policy regret against memory-bounded, stationary, and consistent adversaries.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2024-12
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3123920566
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Algorithms
Games
Machine learning
title Learning in Markov Games with Adaptive Adversaries: Policy Regret, Fundamental Barriers, and Efficient Algorithms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A38%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Learning%20in%20Markov%20Games%20with%20Adaptive%20Adversaries:%20Policy%20Regret,%20Fundamental%20Barriers,%20and%20Efficient%20Algorithms&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Nguyen-Tang,%20Thanh&rft.date=2024-12-09&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3123920566%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31239205663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3123920566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true