Loading…
Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities
Pollinator habitat restorations and enhancements are an important approach to mitigate pollinator declines due to habitat loss and other stressors. Foraging resources can be provided by wildflower plantings grown from seed mixes composed of pollinator‐friendly plant species. Despite clear evidence o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Restoration ecology 2024-11, Vol.32 (8), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2222-cf586a01de0116e4d3e6d77ca3a91863548d818020ef28c2893ec9127d11e073 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Müller, Uta Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne Brokaw, Julia Schreiber, Julia Cariveau, Daniel P. Williams, Neal M. |
description | Pollinator habitat restorations and enhancements are an important approach to mitigate pollinator declines due to habitat loss and other stressors. Foraging resources can be provided by wildflower plantings grown from seed mixes composed of pollinator‐friendly plant species. Despite clear evidence on the benefits of such plantings for bees and other pollinators, there is limited knowledge on how variation in multiple seed mix design parameters affects floral resources over time. Such information is crucial to improve the effectiveness of different habitat applications and to potentially lower seed costs, which remain an impediment to adoption. We conducted an incomplete factorial field experiment to test the impacts of density, diversity, and forb:grass ratio of seed mixes on floral resource availability and phenological coverage of the resulting plantings. We quantified floral area and phenological coverage over the whole blooming season for three consecutive years in replicated plots of wildflower mixes in two regions of the U.S.A, Northern California's Central Valley and Midwestern Tallgrass Prairie. When different seed densities were fully replicated (e.g. within high forb:grass seed ratios in Minnesota, or forb‐only seedings in California), seeding density had no further impact on floral area and floral phenological coverage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rec.14262 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3123923438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3123923438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2222-cf586a01de0116e4d3e6d77ca3a91863548d818020ef28c2893ec9127d11e073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4B9Y4sQhrdfOwzmiqjykSkjQAzfL2JvWVRoXOxFU_HnSplf2Mnv4ZnY1hNwCm0A_04BmAinP-RkZQcbzBBj7OO93lkPCywIuyVWMG8Ygk1KMyO97ZwzGWHU13fm6do1ufaAR0dKt-8FIXWPqziKt_TddBR0jtdhE1-6pbixdu9WaVj580uDMuumTqDbBH4QG3ayQ-oq2vtX1MdM1q5PdYbwmF5WuI96cdEyWj_Pl7DlZvD69zB4WieH9JKbKZK4ZWGQAOaZWYG6LwmihS5C5yFJpJUjGGVZcGi5LgaYEXlgAZIUYk7shdhf8V4exVRvfhaa_qARwUXKRCtlT9wN1_D5gpXbBbXXYK2DqUK3qq1XHant2OrDfrsb9_6B6m88Gxx_8Nnup</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3123923438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Müller, Uta ; Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne ; Brokaw, Julia ; Schreiber, Julia ; Cariveau, Daniel P. ; Williams, Neal M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller, Uta ; Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne ; Brokaw, Julia ; Schreiber, Julia ; Cariveau, Daniel P. ; Williams, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><description>Pollinator habitat restorations and enhancements are an important approach to mitigate pollinator declines due to habitat loss and other stressors. Foraging resources can be provided by wildflower plantings grown from seed mixes composed of pollinator‐friendly plant species. Despite clear evidence on the benefits of such plantings for bees and other pollinators, there is limited knowledge on how variation in multiple seed mix design parameters affects floral resources over time. Such information is crucial to improve the effectiveness of different habitat applications and to potentially lower seed costs, which remain an impediment to adoption. We conducted an incomplete factorial field experiment to test the impacts of density, diversity, and forb:grass ratio of seed mixes on floral resource availability and phenological coverage of the resulting plantings. We quantified floral area and phenological coverage over the whole blooming season for three consecutive years in replicated plots of wildflower mixes in two regions of the U.S.A, Northern California's Central Valley and Midwestern Tallgrass Prairie. When different seed densities were fully replicated (e.g. within high forb:grass seed ratios in Minnesota, or forb‐only seedings in California), seeding density had no further impact on floral area and floral phenological coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.14262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>bee conservation ; Density ; Design parameters ; floral resources ; Grasses ; Habitat loss ; habitat plantings ; Habitats ; Mixtures ; Plant species ; pollinator ; Pollinators ; Population decline ; Prairies ; Resource availability ; restoration ; seed mixes ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2024-11, Vol.32 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2222-cf586a01de0116e4d3e6d77ca3a91863548d818020ef28c2893ec9127d11e073</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7476-3834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brokaw, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cariveau, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><title>Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Pollinator habitat restorations and enhancements are an important approach to mitigate pollinator declines due to habitat loss and other stressors. Foraging resources can be provided by wildflower plantings grown from seed mixes composed of pollinator‐friendly plant species. Despite clear evidence on the benefits of such plantings for bees and other pollinators, there is limited knowledge on how variation in multiple seed mix design parameters affects floral resources over time. Such information is crucial to improve the effectiveness of different habitat applications and to potentially lower seed costs, which remain an impediment to adoption. We conducted an incomplete factorial field experiment to test the impacts of density, diversity, and forb:grass ratio of seed mixes on floral resource availability and phenological coverage of the resulting plantings. We quantified floral area and phenological coverage over the whole blooming season for three consecutive years in replicated plots of wildflower mixes in two regions of the U.S.A, Northern California's Central Valley and Midwestern Tallgrass Prairie. When different seed densities were fully replicated (e.g. within high forb:grass seed ratios in Minnesota, or forb‐only seedings in California), seeding density had no further impact on floral area and floral phenological coverage.</description><subject>bee conservation</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>floral resources</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>habitat plantings</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>pollinator</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>seed mixes</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4B9Y4sQhrdfOwzmiqjykSkjQAzfL2JvWVRoXOxFU_HnSplf2Mnv4ZnY1hNwCm0A_04BmAinP-RkZQcbzBBj7OO93lkPCywIuyVWMG8Ygk1KMyO97ZwzGWHU13fm6do1ufaAR0dKt-8FIXWPqziKt_TddBR0jtdhE1-6pbixdu9WaVj580uDMuumTqDbBH4QG3ayQ-oq2vtX1MdM1q5PdYbwmF5WuI96cdEyWj_Pl7DlZvD69zB4WieH9JKbKZK4ZWGQAOaZWYG6LwmihS5C5yFJpJUjGGVZcGi5LgaYEXlgAZIUYk7shdhf8V4exVRvfhaa_qARwUXKRCtlT9wN1_D5gpXbBbXXYK2DqUK3qq1XHant2OrDfrsb9_6B6m88Gxx_8Nnup</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Müller, Uta</creator><creator>Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne</creator><creator>Brokaw, Julia</creator><creator>Schreiber, Julia</creator><creator>Cariveau, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Williams, Neal M.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-3834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities</title><author>Müller, Uta ; Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne ; Brokaw, Julia ; Schreiber, Julia ; Cariveau, Daniel P. ; Williams, Neal M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2222-cf586a01de0116e4d3e6d77ca3a91863548d818020ef28c2893ec9127d11e073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>bee conservation</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>floral resources</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>habitat plantings</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>pollinator</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>seed mixes</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brokaw, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cariveau, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Neal M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller, Uta</au><au>Bruninga‐Socolar, Bethanne</au><au>Brokaw, Julia</au><au>Schreiber, Julia</au><au>Cariveau, Daniel P.</au><au>Williams, Neal M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Pollinator habitat restorations and enhancements are an important approach to mitigate pollinator declines due to habitat loss and other stressors. Foraging resources can be provided by wildflower plantings grown from seed mixes composed of pollinator‐friendly plant species. Despite clear evidence on the benefits of such plantings for bees and other pollinators, there is limited knowledge on how variation in multiple seed mix design parameters affects floral resources over time. Such information is crucial to improve the effectiveness of different habitat applications and to potentially lower seed costs, which remain an impediment to adoption. We conducted an incomplete factorial field experiment to test the impacts of density, diversity, and forb:grass ratio of seed mixes on floral resource availability and phenological coverage of the resulting plantings. We quantified floral area and phenological coverage over the whole blooming season for three consecutive years in replicated plots of wildflower mixes in two regions of the U.S.A, Northern California's Central Valley and Midwestern Tallgrass Prairie. When different seed densities were fully replicated (e.g. within high forb:grass seed ratios in Minnesota, or forb‐only seedings in California), seeding density had no further impact on floral area and floral phenological coverage.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.14262</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-3834</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2024-11, Vol.32 (8), p.n/a |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3123923438 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | bee conservation Density Design parameters floral resources Grasses Habitat loss habitat plantings Habitats Mixtures Plant species pollinator Pollinators Population decline Prairies Resource availability restoration seed mixes Seeds |
title | Successful pollinator seed mixes include low grass density and high forb richness across a range of total seeding densities |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A03%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20pollinator%20seed%20mixes%20include%20low%20grass%20density%20and%20high%20forb%20richness%20across%20a%20range%20of%20total%20seeding%20densities&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=M%C3%BCller,%20Uta&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.14262&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3123923438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2222-cf586a01de0116e4d3e6d77ca3a91863548d818020ef28c2893ec9127d11e073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3123923438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |