Loading…

Advances in blood cell detection and classification: A review of deep learning and object detection techniques

In the diagnosis and treatment of a patient, blood cell detection and classification is a critical activity. Skilled lab technicians manually inspect the blood cells in a conventional method, which is time-consuming and error-prone. With the recent advancements in image processing, deep learning and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markose, Nisha, Elayidom, M. Sudheep
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the diagnosis and treatment of a patient, blood cell detection and classification is a critical activity. Skilled lab technicians manually inspect the blood cells in a conventional method, which is time-consuming and error-prone. With the recent advancements in image processing, deep learning and object detection techniques has acquired larger attention for automating the procedure of blood cell detection and classification. This article focuses on how image processing and machine learning can be used to morphologically characterise and recognise cell pictures collected from peripheral blood smears. Image processing techniques for blood cell detection are typically based on thresholding, segmentation and morphological operations. Machine learning algorithms can learn from data and adapt to new conditions allowing for more accurate and robust blood cell detection. Deep learning algorithms can learn to extract relevant features from raw image data, eliminating the need for manual feature engineering. Deep learning methodology is superior to traditional image processing methods in literature. This paper also focuses on typical generic architectures for object detection covering one stage as well as two stage detectors to improve the detection performance further. Multiple approaches to microscopic blood cells examinations are analysed and compared using various performance metrics.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0227440