Loading…
AdaFNDFS: An AdaBoost Ensemble Model with Fast Nondominated Feature Selection for Predicting Enterprise Credit Risk in the Supply Chain
Early warnings of enterprise credit risk based on supply chain scenarios are helpful for preventing enterprise credit deterioration and resolving systemic risk. Enterprise credit risk data in the supply chain are characterized by higher‐dimension information and class imbalance. The class imbalance...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of intelligent systems 2024-01, Vol.2024 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-1cb9057160e682537cf168f2b1fee55e146b1e0447a7cfec34a060e86d8b1e7d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | International journal of intelligent systems |
container_volume | 2024 |
creator | Yao, Gang Hu, Xiaojian Song, Pingfan Zhou, Taiyun Zhang, Yue Yasir, Ammar Luo, Suizhi |
description | Early warnings of enterprise credit risk based on supply chain scenarios are helpful for preventing enterprise credit deterioration and resolving systemic risk. Enterprise credit risk data in the supply chain are characterized by higher‐dimension information and class imbalance. The class imbalance influences the feature selection effect, and the feature subset is closely related to the predictive performance of subsequent learning algorithms. Therefore, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and the subsequent class imbalance–oriented classification model is a key issue. We propose an AdaBoost ensemble model with fast nondominated feature selection (AdaFNDFS). AdaFNDFS uses the FNDFS method in the AdaBoost algorithm to iteratively select features and uses the classifier to evaluate the performance of feature subsets to train the class imbalance–oriented classifier and the best‐matched feature subset, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and subsequent classifiers. The further use of the differential sampling rate (DSR) method enables AdaFNDFS to integrate more training models with different knowledge and to obtain higher accuracy and better generalization ability for prediction tasks facing high‐dimensional information and class imbalance. A test using credit risk data from Chinese listed enterprises containing supply chain information demonstrates that the prediction scoring indicators, such as AUC, KS, AP, and accuracy, of the AdaFNDFS are better than those of basic models such as LR, LDA, DT, and SVM and multiple hybrid models that use SMOTE, feature selection, and ensemble methods. AdaFNDFS outperforms the basic models by at least 0.0073 (0.0344, 0.0349, and 0.0071) in terms of the AUC (KS, AP, and accuracy). AdaFNDFS has outstanding advantages in predicting enterprise credit risk in the supply chain and can support interested decision‐makers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2024/5529847 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3126584868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3126584868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-1cb9057160e682537cf168f2b1fee55e146b1e0447a7cfec34a060e86d8b1e7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUF1PwjAUbYwmIvrmD2jiq5Perd2Kb4hMTRCNaOLbUrY7GY4W2y6GX-DftgSebs7HPTf3EHIJ7AZAiEHMYj4QIh5Knh2RHrChjADg85j0mJQ8kpAlp-TMuRVjABkXPfI3qlQ-u8_nt3SkaQB3xjhPJ9rhetEifTYVtvS38UuaqyDMjK7MutHKY0VzVL6zSOfYYukbo2ltLH21WDUB6q8Q49FubOOQjnesp2-N-6aNpn4Z1rrNpt3S8VI1-pyc1Kp1eHGYffKRT97Hj9H05eFpPJpGJUjpIygXQyYySBmmMhZJVtaQyjpeQI0oBAJPF4CM80wFCcuEKxa8Mq1k4LMq6ZOrfe7Gmp8OnS9WprM6nCwSiFMhuUxlcF3vXaU1zlmsi_DEWtltAazYVV3sqi4OVSf_3-Nwqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3126584868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AdaFNDFS: An AdaBoost Ensemble Model with Fast Nondominated Feature Selection for Predicting Enterprise Credit Risk in the Supply Chain</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Yao, Gang ; Hu, Xiaojian ; Song, Pingfan ; Zhou, Taiyun ; Zhang, Yue ; Yasir, Ammar ; Luo, Suizhi</creator><contributor>Ortale, Riccardo ; Riccardo Ortale</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yao, Gang ; Hu, Xiaojian ; Song, Pingfan ; Zhou, Taiyun ; Zhang, Yue ; Yasir, Ammar ; Luo, Suizhi ; Ortale, Riccardo ; Riccardo Ortale</creatorcontrib><description>Early warnings of enterprise credit risk based on supply chain scenarios are helpful for preventing enterprise credit deterioration and resolving systemic risk. Enterprise credit risk data in the supply chain are characterized by higher‐dimension information and class imbalance. The class imbalance influences the feature selection effect, and the feature subset is closely related to the predictive performance of subsequent learning algorithms. Therefore, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and the subsequent class imbalance–oriented classification model is a key issue. We propose an AdaBoost ensemble model with fast nondominated feature selection (AdaFNDFS). AdaFNDFS uses the FNDFS method in the AdaBoost algorithm to iteratively select features and uses the classifier to evaluate the performance of feature subsets to train the class imbalance–oriented classifier and the best‐matched feature subset, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and subsequent classifiers. The further use of the differential sampling rate (DSR) method enables AdaFNDFS to integrate more training models with different knowledge and to obtain higher accuracy and better generalization ability for prediction tasks facing high‐dimensional information and class imbalance. A test using credit risk data from Chinese listed enterprises containing supply chain information demonstrates that the prediction scoring indicators, such as AUC, KS, AP, and accuracy, of the AdaFNDFS are better than those of basic models such as LR, LDA, DT, and SVM and multiple hybrid models that use SMOTE, feature selection, and ensemble methods. AdaFNDFS outperforms the basic models by at least 0.0073 (0.0344, 0.0349, and 0.0071) in terms of the AUC (KS, AP, and accuracy). AdaFNDFS has outstanding advantages in predicting enterprise credit risk in the supply chain and can support interested decision‐makers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-111X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2024/5529847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Classification ; Credit risk ; Datasets ; Ensemble learning ; Feature selection ; Machine learning ; Performance evaluation ; Risk ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>International journal of intelligent systems, 2024-01, Vol.2024 (1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Gang Yao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-1cb9057160e682537cf168f2b1fee55e146b1e0447a7cfec34a060e86d8b1e7d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3007-2382</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3126584868/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3126584868?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ortale, Riccardo</contributor><contributor>Riccardo Ortale</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yao, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaojian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Pingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Taiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasir, Ammar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Suizhi</creatorcontrib><title>AdaFNDFS: An AdaBoost Ensemble Model with Fast Nondominated Feature Selection for Predicting Enterprise Credit Risk in the Supply Chain</title><title>International journal of intelligent systems</title><description>Early warnings of enterprise credit risk based on supply chain scenarios are helpful for preventing enterprise credit deterioration and resolving systemic risk. Enterprise credit risk data in the supply chain are characterized by higher‐dimension information and class imbalance. The class imbalance influences the feature selection effect, and the feature subset is closely related to the predictive performance of subsequent learning algorithms. Therefore, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and the subsequent class imbalance–oriented classification model is a key issue. We propose an AdaBoost ensemble model with fast nondominated feature selection (AdaFNDFS). AdaFNDFS uses the FNDFS method in the AdaBoost algorithm to iteratively select features and uses the classifier to evaluate the performance of feature subsets to train the class imbalance–oriented classifier and the best‐matched feature subset, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and subsequent classifiers. The further use of the differential sampling rate (DSR) method enables AdaFNDFS to integrate more training models with different knowledge and to obtain higher accuracy and better generalization ability for prediction tasks facing high‐dimensional information and class imbalance. A test using credit risk data from Chinese listed enterprises containing supply chain information demonstrates that the prediction scoring indicators, such as AUC, KS, AP, and accuracy, of the AdaFNDFS are better than those of basic models such as LR, LDA, DT, and SVM and multiple hybrid models that use SMOTE, feature selection, and ensemble methods. AdaFNDFS outperforms the basic models by at least 0.0073 (0.0344, 0.0349, and 0.0071) in terms of the AUC (KS, AP, and accuracy). AdaFNDFS has outstanding advantages in predicting enterprise credit risk in the supply chain and can support interested decision‐makers.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Credit risk</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Ensemble learning</subject><subject>Feature selection</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0884-8173</issn><issn>1098-111X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotUF1PwjAUbYwmIvrmD2jiq5Perd2Kb4hMTRCNaOLbUrY7GY4W2y6GX-DftgSebs7HPTf3EHIJ7AZAiEHMYj4QIh5Knh2RHrChjADg85j0mJQ8kpAlp-TMuRVjABkXPfI3qlQ-u8_nt3SkaQB3xjhPJ9rhetEifTYVtvS38UuaqyDMjK7MutHKY0VzVL6zSOfYYukbo2ltLH21WDUB6q8Q49FubOOQjnesp2-N-6aNpn4Z1rrNpt3S8VI1-pyc1Kp1eHGYffKRT97Hj9H05eFpPJpGJUjpIygXQyYySBmmMhZJVtaQyjpeQI0oBAJPF4CM80wFCcuEKxa8Mq1k4LMq6ZOrfe7Gmp8OnS9WprM6nCwSiFMhuUxlcF3vXaU1zlmsi_DEWtltAazYVV3sqi4OVSf_3-Nwqw</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Yao, Gang</creator><creator>Hu, Xiaojian</creator><creator>Song, Pingfan</creator><creator>Zhou, Taiyun</creator><creator>Zhang, Yue</creator><creator>Yasir, Ammar</creator><creator>Luo, Suizhi</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-2382</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>AdaFNDFS: An AdaBoost Ensemble Model with Fast Nondominated Feature Selection for Predicting Enterprise Credit Risk in the Supply Chain</title><author>Yao, Gang ; Hu, Xiaojian ; Song, Pingfan ; Zhou, Taiyun ; Zhang, Yue ; Yasir, Ammar ; Luo, Suizhi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-1cb9057160e682537cf168f2b1fee55e146b1e0447a7cfec34a060e86d8b1e7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Credit risk</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Ensemble learning</topic><topic>Feature selection</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaojian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Pingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Taiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasir, Ammar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Suizhi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of intelligent systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Gang</au><au>Hu, Xiaojian</au><au>Song, Pingfan</au><au>Zhou, Taiyun</au><au>Zhang, Yue</au><au>Yasir, Ammar</au><au>Luo, Suizhi</au><au>Ortale, Riccardo</au><au>Riccardo Ortale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AdaFNDFS: An AdaBoost Ensemble Model with Fast Nondominated Feature Selection for Predicting Enterprise Credit Risk in the Supply Chain</atitle><jtitle>International journal of intelligent systems</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0884-8173</issn><eissn>1098-111X</eissn><abstract>Early warnings of enterprise credit risk based on supply chain scenarios are helpful for preventing enterprise credit deterioration and resolving systemic risk. Enterprise credit risk data in the supply chain are characterized by higher‐dimension information and class imbalance. The class imbalance influences the feature selection effect, and the feature subset is closely related to the predictive performance of subsequent learning algorithms. Therefore, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and the subsequent class imbalance–oriented classification model is a key issue. We propose an AdaBoost ensemble model with fast nondominated feature selection (AdaFNDFS). AdaFNDFS uses the FNDFS method in the AdaBoost algorithm to iteratively select features and uses the classifier to evaluate the performance of feature subsets to train the class imbalance–oriented classifier and the best‐matched feature subset, ensuring the adaptivity of feature selection and subsequent classifiers. The further use of the differential sampling rate (DSR) method enables AdaFNDFS to integrate more training models with different knowledge and to obtain higher accuracy and better generalization ability for prediction tasks facing high‐dimensional information and class imbalance. A test using credit risk data from Chinese listed enterprises containing supply chain information demonstrates that the prediction scoring indicators, such as AUC, KS, AP, and accuracy, of the AdaFNDFS are better than those of basic models such as LR, LDA, DT, and SVM and multiple hybrid models that use SMOTE, feature selection, and ensemble methods. AdaFNDFS outperforms the basic models by at least 0.0073 (0.0344, 0.0349, and 0.0071) in terms of the AUC (KS, AP, and accuracy). AdaFNDFS has outstanding advantages in predicting enterprise credit risk in the supply chain and can support interested decision‐makers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1155/2024/5529847</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-2382</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8173 |
ispartof | International journal of intelligent systems, 2024-01, Vol.2024 (1) |
issn | 0884-8173 1098-111X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3126584868 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Artificial intelligence Classification Credit risk Datasets Ensemble learning Feature selection Machine learning Performance evaluation Risk Supply chains |
title | AdaFNDFS: An AdaBoost Ensemble Model with Fast Nondominated Feature Selection for Predicting Enterprise Credit Risk in the Supply Chain |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AdaFNDFS:%20An%20AdaBoost%20Ensemble%20Model%20with%20Fast%20Nondominated%20Feature%20Selection%20for%20Predicting%20Enterprise%20Credit%20Risk%20in%20the%20Supply%20Chain&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20intelligent%20systems&rft.au=Yao,%20Gang&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=2024&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0884-8173&rft.eissn=1098-111X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2024/5529847&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3126584868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c188t-1cb9057160e682537cf168f2b1fee55e146b1e0447a7cfec34a060e86d8b1e7d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126584868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |