Loading…

The implicit market price of soil erosion: An estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers

We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014. A unique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural economics 2024-11, Vol.55 (6), p.963-984
Main Authors: Caffera, Marcelo, Lavín, Felipe Vásquez, Barrientos, Manuel, Anza, Daniel Rodríguez, Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-5d9d28f1a042ed2aed21d820cb846921b175d84e3e07c98a682c9cdf42d475913
container_end_page 984
container_issue 6
container_start_page 963
container_title Agricultural economics
container_volume 55
creator Caffera, Marcelo
Lavín, Felipe Vásquez
Barrientos, Manuel
Anza, Daniel Rodríguez
Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas
description We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014. A unique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per‐hectare price of agricultural land (P‐value: .012, 95% CI: −.0042, −.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is $.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial‐temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/agec.12857
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3127409955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3127409955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-5d9d28f1a042ed2aed21d820cb846921b175d84e3e07c98a682c9cdf42d475913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HAm7A1k012N95KqVUoeKnnkCbZNjW7WTdbS_-9qfXswDAMPPPxvgjdA5lAiie1sXoCtOLlBRoBL1lGqoJeohGBQmQcOLlGNzHuCAFGaD5C9WprsWs677QbcKP6Tzvgrnfa4lDjGJzHtg_RhfYZT1ts4-AaNaQW76NrN1jhrTWhdRo3wViPD27Y4tglRPlUnffh2_bxFl3Vykd791fH6ONlvpq9Zsv3xdtsusw0CFJm3AhDqxoUYdQaqlKCqSjR64oVgsIaSm4qZnNLSi0qVVRUC21qRg0ruYB8jB7Oe7s-fO3Tt3IX9n2bTsocaMmIEJwn6vFM6SQt9raWSXHSfpRA5MlHefJR_vqYYDjDB-ft8R9SThfz2XnmB1vIdYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3127409955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The implicit market price of soil erosion: An estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Caffera, Marcelo ; Lavín, Felipe Vásquez ; Barrientos, Manuel ; Anza, Daniel Rodríguez ; Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</creator><creatorcontrib>Caffera, Marcelo ; Lavín, Felipe Vásquez ; Barrientos, Manuel ; Anza, Daniel Rodríguez ; Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><description>We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014. A unique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per‐hectare price of agricultural land (P‐value: .012, 95% CI: −.0042, −.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is $.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial‐temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/agec.12857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Farming ; farmland values ; Farms ; Land appraisals ; Market prices ; Soil erosion ; spatial spillovers ; spatio‐temporal hedonic model ; Statistical analysis ; Topsoil ; Uruguay</subject><ispartof>Agricultural economics, 2024-11, Vol.55 (6), p.963-984</ispartof><rights>2024 International Association of Agricultural Economists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-5d9d28f1a042ed2aed21d820cb846921b175d84e3e07c98a682c9cdf42d475913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caffera, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavín, Felipe Vásquez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrientos, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anza, Daniel Rodríguez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><title>The implicit market price of soil erosion: An estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers</title><title>Agricultural economics</title><description>We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014. A unique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per‐hectare price of agricultural land (P‐value: .012, 95% CI: −.0042, −.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is $.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial‐temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>farmland values</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Land appraisals</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>spatial spillovers</subject><subject>spatio‐temporal hedonic model</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Topsoil</subject><subject>Uruguay</subject><issn>0169-5150</issn><issn>1574-0862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HAm7A1k012N95KqVUoeKnnkCbZNjW7WTdbS_-9qfXswDAMPPPxvgjdA5lAiie1sXoCtOLlBRoBL1lGqoJeohGBQmQcOLlGNzHuCAFGaD5C9WprsWs677QbcKP6Tzvgrnfa4lDjGJzHtg_RhfYZT1ts4-AaNaQW76NrN1jhrTWhdRo3wViPD27Y4tglRPlUnffh2_bxFl3Vykd791fH6ONlvpq9Zsv3xdtsusw0CFJm3AhDqxoUYdQaqlKCqSjR64oVgsIaSm4qZnNLSi0qVVRUC21qRg0ruYB8jB7Oe7s-fO3Tt3IX9n2bTsocaMmIEJwn6vFM6SQt9raWSXHSfpRA5MlHefJR_vqYYDjDB-ft8R9SThfz2XnmB1vIdYQ</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Caffera, Marcelo</creator><creator>Lavín, Felipe Vásquez</creator><creator>Barrientos, Manuel</creator><creator>Anza, Daniel Rodríguez</creator><creator>Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>The implicit market price of soil erosion: An estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers</title><author>Caffera, Marcelo ; Lavín, Felipe Vásquez ; Barrientos, Manuel ; Anza, Daniel Rodríguez ; Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-5d9d28f1a042ed2aed21d820cb846921b175d84e3e07c98a682c9cdf42d475913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>farmland values</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Land appraisals</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>spatial spillovers</topic><topic>spatio‐temporal hedonic model</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Topsoil</topic><topic>Uruguay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caffera, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavín, Felipe Vásquez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrientos, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anza, Daniel Rodríguez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caffera, Marcelo</au><au>Lavín, Felipe Vásquez</au><au>Barrientos, Manuel</au><au>Anza, Daniel Rodríguez</au><au>Carrasco‐Letelier, Leonidas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The implicit market price of soil erosion: An estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>963-984</pages><issn>0169-5150</issn><eissn>1574-0862</eissn><abstract>We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014. A unique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per‐hectare price of agricultural land (P‐value: .012, 95% CI: −.0042, −.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is $.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial‐temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/agec.12857</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5150
ispartof Agricultural economics, 2024-11, Vol.55 (6), p.963-984
issn 0169-5150
1574-0862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3127409955
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agricultural land
Farming
farmland values
Farms
Land appraisals
Market prices
Soil erosion
spatial spillovers
spatio‐temporal hedonic model
Statistical analysis
Topsoil
Uruguay
title The implicit market price of soil erosion: An estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A05%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20implicit%20market%20price%20of%20soil%20erosion:%20An%20estimation%20using%20a%20hedonic%20model%20with%20spatial%20spillovers&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Caffera,%20Marcelo&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=963-984&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/agec.12857&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3127409955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-5d9d28f1a042ed2aed21d820cb846921b175d84e3e07c98a682c9cdf42d475913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127409955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true