Loading…
Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning
Background Team‐based learning (TBL) is a widely recognised pedagogical strategy used in diverse fields and courses. Despite the success of TBL, certain concerns have arisen regarding social loafing within group collaboration contexts; this loafing can reduce the overall effectiveness of learning. O...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of computer assisted learning 2024-12, Vol.40 (6), p.3111-3124 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-ee670b7043d4c5899b66aea216e08c2c52e3e438732da06cfdf80530501449de3 |
container_end_page | 3124 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3111 |
container_title | Journal of computer assisted learning |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Lin, Jian‐Wei Chen, Hong‐Ren |
description | Background
Team‐based learning (TBL) is a widely recognised pedagogical strategy used in diverse fields and courses. Despite the success of TBL, certain concerns have arisen regarding social loafing within group collaboration contexts; this loafing can reduce the overall effectiveness of learning.
Objectives
This study addressed the aforementioned concerns by integrating group awareness (GA) information into each stage of TBL, resulting in a TBL + GA system designed to enhance TBL instruction. During online collaborative learning, GA information provides insights into the activities completed by peers and thus the peers' preparedness and achievement; this knowledge fosters motivation, participation, and reflection.
Methods
A quasiexperiment was performed with students from two freshman classes (40 and 41 students, respectively) in a Taiwanese university; the control and experimental classes used the TBL only and TBL + GA systems, respectively. Student learning effort was evaluated in terms of preclass preparation, including the use of learning materials and online test scores. Learning achievement was evaluated by assessing the quality of students' assignments. Student feedback, including peer evaluations and students' perceptions of their TBL experience, was collected and compared for the two classes.
Results and Conclusions
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as higher practice engagement and better online assessment scores. The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback.
Implications
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation and foster a more engaging and constructive learning environment.
Lay Description
What is already known about this topic
Team‐Based Learning (TBL) has recently drawn much attention and has been successfully applied in many fields (different courses)
While TBL requires students to learn autonomously and work together as a team, it also results in social loafing during collaborative learning, thus reducing its learning effectiveness.
Group awareness (GA) information, which provides visual information about peers' learning contexts (activities) in online collaborative learning, can in |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jcal.13058 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3128089579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128089579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-ee670b7043d4c5899b66aea216e08c2c52e3e438732da06cfdf80530501449de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QSR2CGljO3EsZeo4lFUiQ2sLceZRInSJNiJqu44AmfkJLiENbOZzffP4yPkmsKKhrprrGlXlEMqT8iCcpHGLGPqlCyACREnCtQ5ufC-AYBMCbkgYtONWDkz1l0VVa6fhsjsjcMOvY_qbuyjEc3u-_MrNx6LqEXjuoBekrPStB6v_vqSvD8-vK2f4-3r02Z9v40tVSBjRJFBnkHCi8SmUqlcCIOGUYEgLbMpQ44JlxlnhQFhy6KUkIbzgSaJKpAvyc08d3D9x4R-1E0_uS6s1JwyCVKlmQrU7UxZ13vvsNSDq3fGHTQFffSij170r5cA0xne1y0e_iH1S3hkzvwAhWlk8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128089579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Lin, Jian‐Wei ; Chen, Hong‐Ren</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jian‐Wei ; Chen, Hong‐Ren</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Team‐based learning (TBL) is a widely recognised pedagogical strategy used in diverse fields and courses. Despite the success of TBL, certain concerns have arisen regarding social loafing within group collaboration contexts; this loafing can reduce the overall effectiveness of learning.
Objectives
This study addressed the aforementioned concerns by integrating group awareness (GA) information into each stage of TBL, resulting in a TBL + GA system designed to enhance TBL instruction. During online collaborative learning, GA information provides insights into the activities completed by peers and thus the peers' preparedness and achievement; this knowledge fosters motivation, participation, and reflection.
Methods
A quasiexperiment was performed with students from two freshman classes (40 and 41 students, respectively) in a Taiwanese university; the control and experimental classes used the TBL only and TBL + GA systems, respectively. Student learning effort was evaluated in terms of preclass preparation, including the use of learning materials and online test scores. Learning achievement was evaluated by assessing the quality of students' assignments. Student feedback, including peer evaluations and students' perceptions of their TBL experience, was collected and compared for the two classes.
Results and Conclusions
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as higher practice engagement and better online assessment scores. The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback.
Implications
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation and foster a more engaging and constructive learning environment.
Lay Description
What is already known about this topic
Team‐Based Learning (TBL) has recently drawn much attention and has been successfully applied in many fields (different courses)
While TBL requires students to learn autonomously and work together as a team, it also results in social loafing during collaborative learning, thus reducing its learning effectiveness.
Group awareness (GA) information, which provides visual information about peers' learning contexts (activities) in online collaborative learning, can increase the interaction and participation
What this paper adds
This study adds GA information to each learning stage in the TBL process.
This study further proposes the TBL + GA system for facilitating TBL teaching.
This study investigates whether student engagement on each TBL stages significantly differs between the traditional TBL and the proposed TBL + GA systems.
Implications for practice and/or policy
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as an increase in practice engagement and online assessment scores.
The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback, compared with the traditional TBL.
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation, thereby fostering a more engaging and constructive learning environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcal.13058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>CAI ; Collaborative learning ; Colleges & universities ; Computer assisted instruction ; Cooperative Learning ; Educational Environment ; Educational Strategies ; Effectiveness ; Feedback ; group awareness ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Instructional Materials ; Learner Engagement ; learning effectiveness ; Peers ; Quality assessment ; School environment ; Student Participation ; Students ; Teachers ; team‐based learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of computer assisted learning, 2024-12, Vol.40 (6), p.3111-3124</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-ee670b7043d4c5899b66aea216e08c2c52e3e438732da06cfdf80530501449de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2842-1427</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jian‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hong‐Ren</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning</title><title>Journal of computer assisted learning</title><description>Background
Team‐based learning (TBL) is a widely recognised pedagogical strategy used in diverse fields and courses. Despite the success of TBL, certain concerns have arisen regarding social loafing within group collaboration contexts; this loafing can reduce the overall effectiveness of learning.
Objectives
This study addressed the aforementioned concerns by integrating group awareness (GA) information into each stage of TBL, resulting in a TBL + GA system designed to enhance TBL instruction. During online collaborative learning, GA information provides insights into the activities completed by peers and thus the peers' preparedness and achievement; this knowledge fosters motivation, participation, and reflection.
Methods
A quasiexperiment was performed with students from two freshman classes (40 and 41 students, respectively) in a Taiwanese university; the control and experimental classes used the TBL only and TBL + GA systems, respectively. Student learning effort was evaluated in terms of preclass preparation, including the use of learning materials and online test scores. Learning achievement was evaluated by assessing the quality of students' assignments. Student feedback, including peer evaluations and students' perceptions of their TBL experience, was collected and compared for the two classes.
Results and Conclusions
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as higher practice engagement and better online assessment scores. The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback.
Implications
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation and foster a more engaging and constructive learning environment.
Lay Description
What is already known about this topic
Team‐Based Learning (TBL) has recently drawn much attention and has been successfully applied in many fields (different courses)
While TBL requires students to learn autonomously and work together as a team, it also results in social loafing during collaborative learning, thus reducing its learning effectiveness.
Group awareness (GA) information, which provides visual information about peers' learning contexts (activities) in online collaborative learning, can increase the interaction and participation
What this paper adds
This study adds GA information to each learning stage in the TBL process.
This study further proposes the TBL + GA system for facilitating TBL teaching.
This study investigates whether student engagement on each TBL stages significantly differs between the traditional TBL and the proposed TBL + GA systems.
Implications for practice and/or policy
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as an increase in practice engagement and online assessment scores.
The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback, compared with the traditional TBL.
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation, thereby fostering a more engaging and constructive learning environment.</description><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>group awareness</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>learning effectiveness</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>School environment</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>team‐based learning</subject><issn>0266-4909</issn><issn>1365-2729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QSR2CGljO3EsZeo4lFUiQ2sLceZRInSJNiJqu44AmfkJLiENbOZzffP4yPkmsKKhrprrGlXlEMqT8iCcpHGLGPqlCyACREnCtQ5ufC-AYBMCbkgYtONWDkz1l0VVa6fhsjsjcMOvY_qbuyjEc3u-_MrNx6LqEXjuoBekrPStB6v_vqSvD8-vK2f4-3r02Z9v40tVSBjRJFBnkHCi8SmUqlcCIOGUYEgLbMpQ44JlxlnhQFhy6KUkIbzgSaJKpAvyc08d3D9x4R-1E0_uS6s1JwyCVKlmQrU7UxZ13vvsNSDq3fGHTQFffSij170r5cA0xne1y0e_iH1S3hkzvwAhWlk8Q</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Lin, Jian‐Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Hong‐Ren</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-1427</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning</title><author>Lin, Jian‐Wei ; Chen, Hong‐Ren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-ee670b7043d4c5899b66aea216e08c2c52e3e438732da06cfdf80530501449de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>group awareness</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>learning effectiveness</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>School environment</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>team‐based learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jian‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hong‐Ren</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of computer assisted learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Jian‐Wei</au><au>Chen, Hong‐Ren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computer assisted learning</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3111</spage><epage>3124</epage><pages>3111-3124</pages><issn>0266-4909</issn><eissn>1365-2729</eissn><abstract>Background
Team‐based learning (TBL) is a widely recognised pedagogical strategy used in diverse fields and courses. Despite the success of TBL, certain concerns have arisen regarding social loafing within group collaboration contexts; this loafing can reduce the overall effectiveness of learning.
Objectives
This study addressed the aforementioned concerns by integrating group awareness (GA) information into each stage of TBL, resulting in a TBL + GA system designed to enhance TBL instruction. During online collaborative learning, GA information provides insights into the activities completed by peers and thus the peers' preparedness and achievement; this knowledge fosters motivation, participation, and reflection.
Methods
A quasiexperiment was performed with students from two freshman classes (40 and 41 students, respectively) in a Taiwanese university; the control and experimental classes used the TBL only and TBL + GA systems, respectively. Student learning effort was evaluated in terms of preclass preparation, including the use of learning materials and online test scores. Learning achievement was evaluated by assessing the quality of students' assignments. Student feedback, including peer evaluations and students' perceptions of their TBL experience, was collected and compared for the two classes.
Results and Conclusions
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as higher practice engagement and better online assessment scores. The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback.
Implications
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation and foster a more engaging and constructive learning environment.
Lay Description
What is already known about this topic
Team‐Based Learning (TBL) has recently drawn much attention and has been successfully applied in many fields (different courses)
While TBL requires students to learn autonomously and work together as a team, it also results in social loafing during collaborative learning, thus reducing its learning effectiveness.
Group awareness (GA) information, which provides visual information about peers' learning contexts (activities) in online collaborative learning, can increase the interaction and participation
What this paper adds
This study adds GA information to each learning stage in the TBL process.
This study further proposes the TBL + GA system for facilitating TBL teaching.
This study investigates whether student engagement on each TBL stages significantly differs between the traditional TBL and the proposed TBL + GA systems.
Implications for practice and/or policy
The TBL + GA system significantly enhanced the preclass preparation efforts of the participants, mitigating social loafing. This improvement manifested as an increase in practice engagement and online assessment scores.
The TBL + GA system also improved assignment quality and elicited more constructive and positive peer feedback, compared with the traditional TBL.
Integrating GA information into each stage of TBL may positively affect the effectiveness of instruction. The proposed TBL + GA system can serve as a practical model for instructors seeking to enhance TBL implementation, thereby fostering a more engaging and constructive learning environment.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jcal.13058</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-1427</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4909 |
ispartof | Journal of computer assisted learning, 2024-12, Vol.40 (6), p.3111-3124 |
issn | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3128089579 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | CAI Collaborative learning Colleges & universities Computer assisted instruction Cooperative Learning Educational Environment Educational Strategies Effectiveness Feedback group awareness Instructional Effectiveness Instructional Materials Learner Engagement learning effectiveness Peers Quality assessment School environment Student Participation Students Teachers team‐based learning |
title | Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A02%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20group%20awareness%20into%20team%E2%80%90based%20learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computer%20assisted%20learning&rft.au=Lin,%20Jian%E2%80%90Wei&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3111&rft.epage=3124&rft.pages=3111-3124&rft.issn=0266-4909&rft.eissn=1365-2729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcal.13058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128089579%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1908-ee670b7043d4c5899b66aea216e08c2c52e3e438732da06cfdf80530501449de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128089579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |