Loading…

LAWYERLESS LITIGANTS, FILING FEES, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS: LEARNING FROM SCALES

Two Latin phrases describing litigants-pro sc (for oneself) and in forma pauperis (IFP, as a poor person)-prompt this inquiry into the relationship between self-representation and requests for filing fee waivers. We sketch the governing legal principles for people seeking relief in the federal court...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Northwestern University law review 2024-01, Vol.119 (1), p.109-192
Main Authors: Resnik, Judith, Wu, Henry, Dikler, Jenn, Wong, David T, Lilollari, Romina, Stobb, Claire, Beling, Elizabeth, Fried, Avital, Selbrede, Anna, Sollows, Jack, Tessema, Mikael, Udell, Julia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 192
container_issue 1
container_start_page 109
container_title Northwestern University law review
container_volume 119
creator Resnik, Judith
Wu, Henry
Dikler, Jenn
Wong, David T
Lilollari, Romina
Stobb, Claire
Beling, Elizabeth
Fried, Avital
Selbrede, Anna
Sollows, Jack
Tessema, Mikael
Udell, Julia
description Two Latin phrases describing litigants-pro sc (for oneself) and in forma pauperis (IFP, as a poor person)-prompt this inquiry into the relationship between self-representation and requests for filing fee waivers. We sketch the governing legal principles for people seeking relief in the federal courts, the sources of income of the federal judiciary, the differing regimes to which Congress has subjected incarcerated and nonincarcerated people filing civil lawsuits, and analyses enabled by SCALES, a newly available database that coded 2016 and 2017 federal court docket sheets. This Essay's account of what can be learned and of the data gaps demonstrates the challenges of capturing activities in federal lawsuits and the burdens, unfairness, and inefficiencies of current federal court waiver practices.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3128990622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128990622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-15b074356e51e768e27107a60b6095f51615c73edad126b53e7f840dfff894e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTU1PwyAY5qCJc_ofSLzahBcKtN5IRzcSpAmwGE9La-GwGDfX7f9bnacnz_cNWhBC64JxCXfofpr2hBAALhdosOrtXXurQ8DWRLNWLoZn3Bpr3Bq3Ws8keuWCaqLpHG668Osrt8Jxo-fASntlZ3nrY3jBVivv_pq-e8WhUfPwA7rN_eeUHv9xibatjs2msN3azIniCMDOBfCByJJxkTgkKapEJRDZCzIIUvPMQQD_kCyN_QhUDJwlmauSjDnnqi4TYUv0dN09ng7flzSdd_vD5fQ1X-4Y0KquiaCU_QAQJ0Yc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128990622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LAWYERLESS LITIGANTS, FILING FEES, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS: LEARNING FROM SCALES</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><creator>Resnik, Judith ; Wu, Henry ; Dikler, Jenn ; Wong, David T ; Lilollari, Romina ; Stobb, Claire ; Beling, Elizabeth ; Fried, Avital ; Selbrede, Anna ; Sollows, Jack ; Tessema, Mikael ; Udell, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Resnik, Judith ; Wu, Henry ; Dikler, Jenn ; Wong, David T ; Lilollari, Romina ; Stobb, Claire ; Beling, Elizabeth ; Fried, Avital ; Selbrede, Anna ; Sollows, Jack ; Tessema, Mikael ; Udell, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>Two Latin phrases describing litigants-pro sc (for oneself) and in forma pauperis (IFP, as a poor person)-prompt this inquiry into the relationship between self-representation and requests for filing fee waivers. We sketch the governing legal principles for people seeking relief in the federal courts, the sources of income of the federal judiciary, the differing regimes to which Congress has subjected incarcerated and nonincarcerated people filing civil lawsuits, and analyses enabled by SCALES, a newly available database that coded 2016 and 2017 federal court docket sheets. This Essay's account of what can be learned and of the data gaps demonstrates the challenges of capturing activities in federal lawsuits and the burdens, unfairness, and inefficiencies of current federal court waiver practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-3571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Bankruptcy ; Decision making ; Federal courts ; Fees &amp; charges ; Imprisonment ; Judiciary ; Litigation ; Prisoners ; State courts ; Transaction costs ; Waivers</subject><ispartof>Northwestern University law review, 2024-01, Vol.119 (1), p.109-192</ispartof><rights>Copyright Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3128990622/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3128990622?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Resnik, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dikler, Jenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilollari, Romina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stobb, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beling, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Avital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selbrede, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollows, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tessema, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>LAWYERLESS LITIGANTS, FILING FEES, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS: LEARNING FROM SCALES</title><title>Northwestern University law review</title><description>Two Latin phrases describing litigants-pro sc (for oneself) and in forma pauperis (IFP, as a poor person)-prompt this inquiry into the relationship between self-representation and requests for filing fee waivers. We sketch the governing legal principles for people seeking relief in the federal courts, the sources of income of the federal judiciary, the differing regimes to which Congress has subjected incarcerated and nonincarcerated people filing civil lawsuits, and analyses enabled by SCALES, a newly available database that coded 2016 and 2017 federal court docket sheets. This Essay's account of what can be learned and of the data gaps demonstrates the challenges of capturing activities in federal lawsuits and the burdens, unfairness, and inefficiencies of current federal court waiver practices.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Federal courts</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>State courts</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>Waivers</subject><issn>0029-3571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotTU1PwyAY5qCJc_ofSLzahBcKtN5IRzcSpAmwGE9La-GwGDfX7f9bnacnz_cNWhBC64JxCXfofpr2hBAALhdosOrtXXurQ8DWRLNWLoZn3Bpr3Bq3Ws8keuWCaqLpHG668Osrt8Jxo-fASntlZ3nrY3jBVivv_pq-e8WhUfPwA7rN_eeUHv9xibatjs2msN3azIniCMDOBfCByJJxkTgkKapEJRDZCzIIUvPMQQD_kCyN_QhUDJwlmauSjDnnqi4TYUv0dN09ng7flzSdd_vD5fQ1X-4Y0KquiaCU_QAQJ0Yc</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Resnik, Judith</creator><creator>Wu, Henry</creator><creator>Dikler, Jenn</creator><creator>Wong, David T</creator><creator>Lilollari, Romina</creator><creator>Stobb, Claire</creator><creator>Beling, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Fried, Avital</creator><creator>Selbrede, Anna</creator><creator>Sollows, Jack</creator><creator>Tessema, Mikael</creator><creator>Udell, Julia</creator><general>Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>LAWYERLESS LITIGANTS, FILING FEES, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS: LEARNING FROM SCALES</title><author>Resnik, Judith ; Wu, Henry ; Dikler, Jenn ; Wong, David T ; Lilollari, Romina ; Stobb, Claire ; Beling, Elizabeth ; Fried, Avital ; Selbrede, Anna ; Sollows, Jack ; Tessema, Mikael ; Udell, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-15b074356e51e768e27107a60b6095f51615c73edad126b53e7f840dfff894e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Federal courts</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>State courts</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>Waivers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Resnik, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dikler, Jenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilollari, Romina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stobb, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beling, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Avital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selbrede, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollows, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tessema, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Northwestern University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Resnik, Judith</au><au>Wu, Henry</au><au>Dikler, Jenn</au><au>Wong, David T</au><au>Lilollari, Romina</au><au>Stobb, Claire</au><au>Beling, Elizabeth</au><au>Fried, Avital</au><au>Selbrede, Anna</au><au>Sollows, Jack</au><au>Tessema, Mikael</au><au>Udell, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LAWYERLESS LITIGANTS, FILING FEES, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS: LEARNING FROM SCALES</atitle><jtitle>Northwestern University law review</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>109-192</pages><issn>0029-3571</issn><abstract>Two Latin phrases describing litigants-pro sc (for oneself) and in forma pauperis (IFP, as a poor person)-prompt this inquiry into the relationship between self-representation and requests for filing fee waivers. We sketch the governing legal principles for people seeking relief in the federal courts, the sources of income of the federal judiciary, the differing regimes to which Congress has subjected incarcerated and nonincarcerated people filing civil lawsuits, and analyses enabled by SCALES, a newly available database that coded 2016 and 2017 federal court docket sheets. This Essay's account of what can be learned and of the data gaps demonstrates the challenges of capturing activities in federal lawsuits and the burdens, unfairness, and inefficiencies of current federal court waiver practices.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</pub><tpages>84</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-3571
ispartof Northwestern University law review, 2024-01, Vol.119 (1), p.109-192
issn 0029-3571
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3128990622
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK; ABI/INFORM global
subjects Attorneys
Bankruptcy
Decision making
Federal courts
Fees & charges
Imprisonment
Judiciary
Litigation
Prisoners
State courts
Transaction costs
Waivers
title LAWYERLESS LITIGANTS, FILING FEES, TRANSACTION COSTS, AND THE FEDERAL COURTS: LEARNING FROM SCALES
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LAWYERLESS%20LITIGANTS,%20FILING%20FEES,%20TRANSACTION%20COSTS,%20AND%20THE%20FEDERAL%20COURTS:%20LEARNING%20FROM%20SCALES&rft.jtitle=Northwestern%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=Resnik,%20Judith&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=109-192&rft.issn=0029-3571&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3128990622%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-15b074356e51e768e27107a60b6095f51615c73edad126b53e7f840dfff894e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128990622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true