Loading…

Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience

Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Justice evaluation journal (Online) 2024-07, Vol.7 (2), p.193-211
Main Authors: Gallagher, John R., Nordberg, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183
container_end_page 211
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title Justice evaluation journal (Online)
container_volume 7
creator Gallagher, John R.
Nordberg, Anne
description Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3130500210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130500210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRujiQT5CCZNfNGHYW-70tU3gqhLJIaAz00ZdzgC22w7It_eIWh8un9ycu49P0KugfWBJeyex0qCVrrPGY_7PGYg4-SMdA77CHSizv96pS9Jz_s1Y4xLgIEUHdKk29pVu6Jc0blDG7ZYBlqU_4ZR1bjwQId02thNEWwodkjTMqCrHf4MEww2mu3L8IG-8PR2mk5md7TKabugj65ZHT3o-KtGV2CZ4RW5yO3GY-9Uu-T9aTwfvUSvb8_paPgaZSB1iDgDbcEqKQFjFi9UBlaoLBFqkeSKZ2yp5FLIHBjnGpZtcJlnCGyQa7QJJKJLbo6-bcbPBn0w6_aTsj1pBAgmWxDAWpU8qjJXee8wN7UrttbtDTBzgGx-IZsDZHOCLL4BDcVuSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130500210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Gallagher, John R. ; Nordberg, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, John R. ; Nordberg, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-1979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-1987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Courts ; Criminal justice ; Drug abuse ; Drug courts ; Drugs ; Human dignity ; Legal reform ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Motivation ; Qualitative research ; Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Justice evaluation journal (Online), 2024-07, Vol.7 (2), p.193-211</ispartof><rights>2024 Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</title><title>Justice evaluation journal (Online)</title><description>Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.</description><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug courts</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Human dignity</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><issn>2475-1979</issn><issn>2475-1987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRujiQT5CCZNfNGHYW-70tU3gqhLJIaAz00ZdzgC22w7It_eIWh8un9ycu49P0KugfWBJeyex0qCVrrPGY_7PGYg4-SMdA77CHSizv96pS9Jz_s1Y4xLgIEUHdKk29pVu6Jc0blDG7ZYBlqU_4ZR1bjwQId02thNEWwodkjTMqCrHf4MEww2mu3L8IG-8PR2mk5md7TKabugj65ZHT3o-KtGV2CZ4RW5yO3GY-9Uu-T9aTwfvUSvb8_paPgaZSB1iDgDbcEqKQFjFi9UBlaoLBFqkeSKZ2yp5FLIHBjnGpZtcJlnCGyQa7QJJKJLbo6-bcbPBn0w6_aTsj1pBAgmWxDAWpU8qjJXee8wN7UrttbtDTBzgGx-IZsDZHOCLL4BDcVuSA</recordid><startdate>20240702</startdate><enddate>20240702</enddate><creator>Gallagher, John R.</creator><creator>Nordberg, Anne</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240702</creationdate><title>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</title><author>Gallagher, John R. ; Nordberg, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug courts</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Human dignity</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Justice evaluation journal (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallagher, John R.</au><au>Nordberg, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</atitle><jtitle>Justice evaluation journal (Online)</jtitle><date>2024-07-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>193-211</pages><issn>2475-1979</issn><eissn>2475-1987</eissn><abstract>Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2475-1979
ispartof Justice evaluation journal (Online), 2024-07, Vol.7 (2), p.193-211
issn 2475-1979
2475-1987
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3130500210
source Taylor & Francis; PAIS Index
subjects Courts
Criminal justice
Drug abuse
Drug courts
Drugs
Human dignity
Legal reform
Mental disorders
Mental health
Motivation
Qualitative research
Rehabilitation
title Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Treatment%20in%20Treatment%20Court:%20A%20Qualitative%20Interpretive%20Meta-Synthesis%20(QIMS)%20of%20the%20Drug%20Court%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Justice%20evaluation%20journal%20(Online)&rft.au=Gallagher,%20John%20R.&rft.date=2024-07-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=193-211&rft.issn=2475-1979&rft.eissn=2475-1987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3130500210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130500210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true