Loading…
Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience
Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Justice evaluation journal (Online) 2024-07, Vol.7 (2), p.193-211 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183 |
container_end_page | 211 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Justice evaluation journal (Online) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Gallagher, John R. Nordberg, Anne |
description | Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3130500210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130500210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRujiQT5CCZNfNGHYW-70tU3gqhLJIaAz00ZdzgC22w7It_eIWh8un9ycu49P0KugfWBJeyex0qCVrrPGY_7PGYg4-SMdA77CHSizv96pS9Jz_s1Y4xLgIEUHdKk29pVu6Jc0blDG7ZYBlqU_4ZR1bjwQId02thNEWwodkjTMqCrHf4MEww2mu3L8IG-8PR2mk5md7TKabugj65ZHT3o-KtGV2CZ4RW5yO3GY-9Uu-T9aTwfvUSvb8_paPgaZSB1iDgDbcEqKQFjFi9UBlaoLBFqkeSKZ2yp5FLIHBjnGpZtcJlnCGyQa7QJJKJLbo6-bcbPBn0w6_aTsj1pBAgmWxDAWpU8qjJXee8wN7UrttbtDTBzgGx-IZsDZHOCLL4BDcVuSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130500210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Gallagher, John R. ; Nordberg, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, John R. ; Nordberg, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-1979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-1987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Courts ; Criminal justice ; Drug abuse ; Drug courts ; Drugs ; Human dignity ; Legal reform ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Motivation ; Qualitative research ; Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Justice evaluation journal (Online), 2024-07, Vol.7 (2), p.193-211</ispartof><rights>2024 Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</title><title>Justice evaluation journal (Online)</title><description>Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.</description><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug courts</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Human dignity</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><issn>2475-1979</issn><issn>2475-1987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9PwjAUxRujiQT5CCZNfNGHYW-70tU3gqhLJIaAz00ZdzgC22w7It_eIWh8un9ycu49P0KugfWBJeyex0qCVrrPGY_7PGYg4-SMdA77CHSizv96pS9Jz_s1Y4xLgIEUHdKk29pVu6Jc0blDG7ZYBlqU_4ZR1bjwQId02thNEWwodkjTMqCrHf4MEww2mu3L8IG-8PR2mk5md7TKabugj65ZHT3o-KtGV2CZ4RW5yO3GY-9Uu-T9aTwfvUSvb8_paPgaZSB1iDgDbcEqKQFjFi9UBlaoLBFqkeSKZ2yp5FLIHBjnGpZtcJlnCGyQa7QJJKJLbo6-bcbPBn0w6_aTsj1pBAgmWxDAWpU8qjJXee8wN7UrttbtDTBzgGx-IZsDZHOCLL4BDcVuSA</recordid><startdate>20240702</startdate><enddate>20240702</enddate><creator>Gallagher, John R.</creator><creator>Nordberg, Anne</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240702</creationdate><title>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</title><author>Gallagher, John R. ; Nordberg, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug courts</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Human dignity</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Justice evaluation journal (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallagher, John R.</au><au>Nordberg, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience</atitle><jtitle>Justice evaluation journal (Online)</jtitle><date>2024-07-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>193-211</pages><issn>2475-1979</issn><eissn>2475-1987</eissn><abstract>Drug courts have played a key role in criminal justice reform, particularly in supporting substance use and mental health disorder recovery. Little is known, though, related to drug court participants’ views on the strengths of the program that support their recovery and what suggestions they have to improve programming. This qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) provides a behind-the-scenes perspective of drug court programming from the voices of participants (n = 183). Based on data extracted from a synthesis of nine qualitative studies, three new themes emerged related to the strengths of drug court that support recovery and suggestions to improve programming. The new themes are: (1) Improving treatment in treatment court; (2) The interplay between internal motivation for change and dignity and respect for all; and (3) Being future oriented: Developing a sustainable recovery support system. Implications for drug court practice, policy advocacy, and future research are discussed. Drug courts should revisit how clinical information is exchanged between treatment providers and the justice system, and potentially reduce this collaboration. Furthermore, recommendations are offered on how drug courts can support participants in developing internal motivation for recovery and in sustaining recovery post-drug court.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2475-1979 |
ispartof | Justice evaluation journal (Online), 2024-07, Vol.7 (2), p.193-211 |
issn | 2475-1979 2475-1987 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3130500210 |
source | Taylor & Francis; PAIS Index |
subjects | Courts Criminal justice Drug abuse Drug courts Drugs Human dignity Legal reform Mental disorders Mental health Motivation Qualitative research Rehabilitation |
title | Improving Treatment in Treatment Court: A Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis (QIMS) of the Drug Court Experience |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Treatment%20in%20Treatment%20Court:%20A%20Qualitative%20Interpretive%20Meta-Synthesis%20(QIMS)%20of%20the%20Drug%20Court%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Justice%20evaluation%20journal%20(Online)&rft.au=Gallagher,%20John%20R.&rft.date=2024-07-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=193-211&rft.issn=2475-1979&rft.eissn=2475-1987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/24751979.2024.2401548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3130500210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-2019a1a7551e404b7c1a37c837b8f72c0d75d35f102291d5485fce106f9ea8183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130500210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |