The Sanjaya Myth: Sanjaya Belatthiputta and the Catuskoti

• Published in: Philosophy east & west 2023-09, Vol.74 (4), p.617-III
• Main Authors: Copeland, B. Jack, Alam Nizar, Syed Moynul
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Argument (Philosophy); Belatthiputta, Sanjaya; Buddhism; Buddhists; Criticism and interpretation; Hypotheses; Philosophers
• ISSN: 0031-8221; 1529-1898; 1529-1898
• DOI: 10.1353/pew.0.a917045

Respected modern scholars regard the pre-Buddhist philosopher Sañjaya Belaṭṭhiputta—a significant figure in the Buddhist canon—as the originator of the important classical argument- forms known as the catuṣkoṭi and catuṣkoṭi vinirmukta. We argue that the early Buddhist texts do not in fact support this view of the origin of these argument-forms; the question of their origin is open. While it is certainly true that the Pāli Sāmaññaphala Sutta and some of its parallels portray Sañjaya as deploying the catuṣkoṭi, there is nothing in these passages to suggest that he was its originator. The situation concerning the catuṣkoṭi vinirmukta is perhaps even more surprising: There is nothing in the early Pāli texts and their parallels—nor in Buddhagosa’s famous Pāli commentary on the early texts—to show that Sañjaya even deployed the catuṣkoṭi vinirmukta let alone originated it. Further, our investigations also call into question the standard portrayal of Sañjaya as an obfuscator and prevaricator. It appears he may have been a more interesting and able philosopher than the Sāmaññaphala Sutta—and modern accounts based on it—maintain.