Loading…
Magnetosheath Plasma Flow and Its Response to IMF and Geodipole Tilt as Obtained From the Data‐Based Modeling
Large‐scale patterns of the steady‐state magnetosheath plasma flow and their dependence on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) have been reconstructed for the first time on the basis of large multi‐year multi‐mission pool of spacecraft observations, concurrent interplanetary data, and an empiric...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2024-11, Vol.129 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-2a8c21c2c40fe5038331ee153819e0b127362cd2654927deeef7f14263af844c3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Tsyganenko, N. A. Semenov, V. S. Erkaev, N. V. Gubaidulin, N. T. |
description | Large‐scale patterns of the steady‐state magnetosheath plasma flow and their dependence on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) have been reconstructed for the first time on the basis of large multi‐year multi‐mission pool of spacecraft observations, concurrent interplanetary data, and an empirical high‐resolution model. The flow model architecture builds upon a recently developed magnetosheath magnetic field representation by flexible expansions of its toroidal and poloidal components in a coordinate system, naturally conformed with the magnetopause and bow shock shapes. The model includes two physics‐based flow symmetry modes: the first one treats the magnetosphere as an axisymmetric unmagnetized obstacle, whereas the second mode takes into account the geodipole tilt, an important factor in the reconnection effects. The spacecraft data pool includes 1‐min average data by Themis (2007–2024), Cluster (2001–2022), and MMS‐1 (2015–2024) missions, as well as OMNI interplanetary data. The model drivers include the solar wind particle flux, IMF components, and the geodipole tilt angle. The model calculations faithfully reproduce the average plasma flow geometry and substantial effects have been found of the IMF orientation and magnitude, a principal factor that defines electromagnetic forces inside the magnetosheath. A strong dependence of the magnetosheath flow patterns on the Earth's dipole tilt indicates an important contribution of reconnection effects at the magnetopause to the solar wind particle transport around the dayside magnetosphere.
Plain Language Summary
As a result of the solar wind interaction with the geomagnetic field, the Earth's magnetosphere becomes embedded within a huge “cocoon”, a vast region between the bow shock and the magnetopause, where the incoming plasma stream gets compressed, heated, and diverted sideways around the magnetospheric boundary. An important factor that significantly affects the magnetosheath flow is the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), transported to the Earth's orbit from the solar corona. The IMF undergoes compression and deformation inside the magnetosheath; the resulting electromagnetic forces substantially affect the plasma flow. Furthermore, the magnetic fields of solar and terrestrial origin can reconnect at the magnetopause, which results in additional modifications of the plasma flow pattern. During the last decades, huge amounts of satellite data were obtained in the near‐Earth space; using them in |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2024JA033233 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3132809292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3132809292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-2a8c21c2c40fe5038331ee153819e0b127362cd2654927deeef7f14263af844c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwkAQhjdGE4ly8wE28Wp1d3bb7h4RBSEQDMFzs7RTKCnd2l1CuPkIPqNPYhVNPDmXf_Lly0zyE3LF2S1noO-AgRz3mBAgxAnpAI90oCWD099dKHZOus5tWDuqRTzsEDs1qwq9dWs0fk2fS-O2hg5Ku6emyujIOzpHV9vKIfWWjqaDbz5EmxW1LZEuitJT4-hs6U1RYUYHjd1Sv0b6YLz5eHu_N66lU5thWVSrS3KWm9Jh9ycvyMvgcdF_Ciaz4ajfmwQp15IHYFQKPIVUshxDJpQQHJGHQnGNbMkhFhGkGUSh1BBniJjHOZcQCZMrKVNxQa6Pd-vGvu7Q-WRjd03VvkwEF6CYBg2tdXO00sY612Ce1E2xNc0h4Sz5ajX522qri6O-L0o8_Osm4-G8F6pYcfEJFv13HA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132809292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetosheath Plasma Flow and Its Response to IMF and Geodipole Tilt as Obtained From the Data‐Based Modeling</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Tsyganenko, N. A. ; Semenov, V. S. ; Erkaev, N. V. ; Gubaidulin, N. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsyganenko, N. A. ; Semenov, V. S. ; Erkaev, N. V. ; Gubaidulin, N. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Large‐scale patterns of the steady‐state magnetosheath plasma flow and their dependence on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) have been reconstructed for the first time on the basis of large multi‐year multi‐mission pool of spacecraft observations, concurrent interplanetary data, and an empirical high‐resolution model. The flow model architecture builds upon a recently developed magnetosheath magnetic field representation by flexible expansions of its toroidal and poloidal components in a coordinate system, naturally conformed with the magnetopause and bow shock shapes. The model includes two physics‐based flow symmetry modes: the first one treats the magnetosphere as an axisymmetric unmagnetized obstacle, whereas the second mode takes into account the geodipole tilt, an important factor in the reconnection effects. The spacecraft data pool includes 1‐min average data by Themis (2007–2024), Cluster (2001–2022), and MMS‐1 (2015–2024) missions, as well as OMNI interplanetary data. The model drivers include the solar wind particle flux, IMF components, and the geodipole tilt angle. The model calculations faithfully reproduce the average plasma flow geometry and substantial effects have been found of the IMF orientation and magnitude, a principal factor that defines electromagnetic forces inside the magnetosheath. A strong dependence of the magnetosheath flow patterns on the Earth's dipole tilt indicates an important contribution of reconnection effects at the magnetopause to the solar wind particle transport around the dayside magnetosphere.
Plain Language Summary
As a result of the solar wind interaction with the geomagnetic field, the Earth's magnetosphere becomes embedded within a huge “cocoon”, a vast region between the bow shock and the magnetopause, where the incoming plasma stream gets compressed, heated, and diverted sideways around the magnetospheric boundary. An important factor that significantly affects the magnetosheath flow is the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), transported to the Earth's orbit from the solar corona. The IMF undergoes compression and deformation inside the magnetosheath; the resulting electromagnetic forces substantially affect the plasma flow. Furthermore, the magnetic fields of solar and terrestrial origin can reconnect at the magnetopause, which results in additional modifications of the plasma flow pattern. During the last decades, huge amounts of satellite data were obtained in the near‐Earth space; using them in combination with a flexible mathematical model allowed us to quantitatively reconstruct the magnetosheath plasma flows and their dependence on the interplanetary factors and orientation of the Earth's magnetic dipole. The present paper describes first results of that study.
Key Points
Large‐scale patterns of the magnetosheath plasma flow are reconstructed from multi‐year sets of in situ data and an advanced empirical model
Substantial interplanetary magnetic field influence on the flow patterns is revealed, induced by magnetic field compression and tensions inside the magnetosheath
Plasma flows significantly depend on the dipole tilt, indicating the important role of reconnection effects around the dayside magnetopause</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2024JA033233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude (inclination) ; Axisymmetric flow ; Charged particles ; Coordinate systems ; Coordinates ; Corona ; Earth magnetosphere ; Earth orbits ; Electromagnetic forces ; Flow distribution ; Flow geometry ; Flow pattern ; Geomagnetic field ; Interplanetary magnetic field ; Magnetic dipoles ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetopause ; Magnetosheath ; magnetosphere ; Magnetospheric boundary ; modeling ; Particle transport ; Plasma ; reconnection ; Satellite data ; Solar corona ; Solar magnetic field ; Solar wind ; Solar wind particles ; Space missions ; Spacecraft ; Wind effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2024-11, Vol.129 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-2a8c21c2c40fe5038331ee153819e0b127362cd2654927deeef7f14263af844c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6592-056X ; 0000-0002-5938-1579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsyganenko, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semenov, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkaev, N. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubaidulin, N. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetosheath Plasma Flow and Its Response to IMF and Geodipole Tilt as Obtained From the Data‐Based Modeling</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Large‐scale patterns of the steady‐state magnetosheath plasma flow and their dependence on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) have been reconstructed for the first time on the basis of large multi‐year multi‐mission pool of spacecraft observations, concurrent interplanetary data, and an empirical high‐resolution model. The flow model architecture builds upon a recently developed magnetosheath magnetic field representation by flexible expansions of its toroidal and poloidal components in a coordinate system, naturally conformed with the magnetopause and bow shock shapes. The model includes two physics‐based flow symmetry modes: the first one treats the magnetosphere as an axisymmetric unmagnetized obstacle, whereas the second mode takes into account the geodipole tilt, an important factor in the reconnection effects. The spacecraft data pool includes 1‐min average data by Themis (2007–2024), Cluster (2001–2022), and MMS‐1 (2015–2024) missions, as well as OMNI interplanetary data. The model drivers include the solar wind particle flux, IMF components, and the geodipole tilt angle. The model calculations faithfully reproduce the average plasma flow geometry and substantial effects have been found of the IMF orientation and magnitude, a principal factor that defines electromagnetic forces inside the magnetosheath. A strong dependence of the magnetosheath flow patterns on the Earth's dipole tilt indicates an important contribution of reconnection effects at the magnetopause to the solar wind particle transport around the dayside magnetosphere.
Plain Language Summary
As a result of the solar wind interaction with the geomagnetic field, the Earth's magnetosphere becomes embedded within a huge “cocoon”, a vast region between the bow shock and the magnetopause, where the incoming plasma stream gets compressed, heated, and diverted sideways around the magnetospheric boundary. An important factor that significantly affects the magnetosheath flow is the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), transported to the Earth's orbit from the solar corona. The IMF undergoes compression and deformation inside the magnetosheath; the resulting electromagnetic forces substantially affect the plasma flow. Furthermore, the magnetic fields of solar and terrestrial origin can reconnect at the magnetopause, which results in additional modifications of the plasma flow pattern. During the last decades, huge amounts of satellite data were obtained in the near‐Earth space; using them in combination with a flexible mathematical model allowed us to quantitatively reconstruct the magnetosheath plasma flows and their dependence on the interplanetary factors and orientation of the Earth's magnetic dipole. The present paper describes first results of that study.
Key Points
Large‐scale patterns of the magnetosheath plasma flow are reconstructed from multi‐year sets of in situ data and an advanced empirical model
Substantial interplanetary magnetic field influence on the flow patterns is revealed, induced by magnetic field compression and tensions inside the magnetosheath
Plasma flows significantly depend on the dipole tilt, indicating the important role of reconnection effects around the dayside magnetopause</description><subject>Attitude (inclination)</subject><subject>Axisymmetric flow</subject><subject>Charged particles</subject><subject>Coordinate systems</subject><subject>Coordinates</subject><subject>Corona</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Earth orbits</subject><subject>Electromagnetic forces</subject><subject>Flow distribution</subject><subject>Flow geometry</subject><subject>Flow pattern</subject><subject>Geomagnetic field</subject><subject>Interplanetary magnetic field</subject><subject>Magnetic dipoles</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetopause</subject><subject>Magnetosheath</subject><subject>magnetosphere</subject><subject>Magnetospheric boundary</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Particle transport</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>reconnection</subject><subject>Satellite data</subject><subject>Solar corona</subject><subject>Solar magnetic field</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Solar wind particles</subject><subject>Space missions</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwkAQhjdGE4ly8wE28Wp1d3bb7h4RBSEQDMFzs7RTKCnd2l1CuPkIPqNPYhVNPDmXf_Lly0zyE3LF2S1noO-AgRz3mBAgxAnpAI90oCWD099dKHZOus5tWDuqRTzsEDs1qwq9dWs0fk2fS-O2hg5Ku6emyujIOzpHV9vKIfWWjqaDbz5EmxW1LZEuitJT4-hs6U1RYUYHjd1Sv0b6YLz5eHu_N66lU5thWVSrS3KWm9Jh9ycvyMvgcdF_Ciaz4ajfmwQp15IHYFQKPIVUshxDJpQQHJGHQnGNbMkhFhGkGUSh1BBniJjHOZcQCZMrKVNxQa6Pd-vGvu7Q-WRjd03VvkwEF6CYBg2tdXO00sY612Ce1E2xNc0h4Sz5ajX522qri6O-L0o8_Osm4-G8F6pYcfEJFv13HA</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Tsyganenko, N. A.</creator><creator>Semenov, V. S.</creator><creator>Erkaev, N. V.</creator><creator>Gubaidulin, N. T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-056X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-1579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Magnetosheath Plasma Flow and Its Response to IMF and Geodipole Tilt as Obtained From the Data‐Based Modeling</title><author>Tsyganenko, N. A. ; Semenov, V. S. ; Erkaev, N. V. ; Gubaidulin, N. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-2a8c21c2c40fe5038331ee153819e0b127362cd2654927deeef7f14263af844c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Attitude (inclination)</topic><topic>Axisymmetric flow</topic><topic>Charged particles</topic><topic>Coordinate systems</topic><topic>Coordinates</topic><topic>Corona</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Earth orbits</topic><topic>Electromagnetic forces</topic><topic>Flow distribution</topic><topic>Flow geometry</topic><topic>Flow pattern</topic><topic>Geomagnetic field</topic><topic>Interplanetary magnetic field</topic><topic>Magnetic dipoles</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetopause</topic><topic>Magnetosheath</topic><topic>magnetosphere</topic><topic>Magnetospheric boundary</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Particle transport</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>reconnection</topic><topic>Satellite data</topic><topic>Solar corona</topic><topic>Solar magnetic field</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Solar wind particles</topic><topic>Space missions</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsyganenko, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semenov, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkaev, N. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubaidulin, N. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsyganenko, N. A.</au><au>Semenov, V. S.</au><au>Erkaev, N. V.</au><au>Gubaidulin, N. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetosheath Plasma Flow and Its Response to IMF and Geodipole Tilt as Obtained From the Data‐Based Modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Large‐scale patterns of the steady‐state magnetosheath plasma flow and their dependence on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) have been reconstructed for the first time on the basis of large multi‐year multi‐mission pool of spacecraft observations, concurrent interplanetary data, and an empirical high‐resolution model. The flow model architecture builds upon a recently developed magnetosheath magnetic field representation by flexible expansions of its toroidal and poloidal components in a coordinate system, naturally conformed with the magnetopause and bow shock shapes. The model includes two physics‐based flow symmetry modes: the first one treats the magnetosphere as an axisymmetric unmagnetized obstacle, whereas the second mode takes into account the geodipole tilt, an important factor in the reconnection effects. The spacecraft data pool includes 1‐min average data by Themis (2007–2024), Cluster (2001–2022), and MMS‐1 (2015–2024) missions, as well as OMNI interplanetary data. The model drivers include the solar wind particle flux, IMF components, and the geodipole tilt angle. The model calculations faithfully reproduce the average plasma flow geometry and substantial effects have been found of the IMF orientation and magnitude, a principal factor that defines electromagnetic forces inside the magnetosheath. A strong dependence of the magnetosheath flow patterns on the Earth's dipole tilt indicates an important contribution of reconnection effects at the magnetopause to the solar wind particle transport around the dayside magnetosphere.
Plain Language Summary
As a result of the solar wind interaction with the geomagnetic field, the Earth's magnetosphere becomes embedded within a huge “cocoon”, a vast region between the bow shock and the magnetopause, where the incoming plasma stream gets compressed, heated, and diverted sideways around the magnetospheric boundary. An important factor that significantly affects the magnetosheath flow is the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), transported to the Earth's orbit from the solar corona. The IMF undergoes compression and deformation inside the magnetosheath; the resulting electromagnetic forces substantially affect the plasma flow. Furthermore, the magnetic fields of solar and terrestrial origin can reconnect at the magnetopause, which results in additional modifications of the plasma flow pattern. During the last decades, huge amounts of satellite data were obtained in the near‐Earth space; using them in combination with a flexible mathematical model allowed us to quantitatively reconstruct the magnetosheath plasma flows and their dependence on the interplanetary factors and orientation of the Earth's magnetic dipole. The present paper describes first results of that study.
Key Points
Large‐scale patterns of the magnetosheath plasma flow are reconstructed from multi‐year sets of in situ data and an advanced empirical model
Substantial interplanetary magnetic field influence on the flow patterns is revealed, induced by magnetic field compression and tensions inside the magnetosheath
Plasma flows significantly depend on the dipole tilt, indicating the important role of reconnection effects around the dayside magnetopause</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2024JA033233</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-056X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-1579</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9380 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2024-11, Vol.129 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3132809292 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Attitude (inclination) Axisymmetric flow Charged particles Coordinate systems Coordinates Corona Earth magnetosphere Earth orbits Electromagnetic forces Flow distribution Flow geometry Flow pattern Geomagnetic field Interplanetary magnetic field Magnetic dipoles Magnetic fields Magnetopause Magnetosheath magnetosphere Magnetospheric boundary modeling Particle transport Plasma reconnection Satellite data Solar corona Solar magnetic field Solar wind Solar wind particles Space missions Spacecraft Wind effects |
title | Magnetosheath Plasma Flow and Its Response to IMF and Geodipole Tilt as Obtained From the Data‐Based Modeling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetosheath%20Plasma%20Flow%20and%20Its%20Response%20to%20IMF%20and%20Geodipole%20Tilt%20as%20Obtained%20From%20the%20Data%E2%80%90Based%20Modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Tsyganenko,%20N.%20A.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2024JA033233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132809292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-2a8c21c2c40fe5038331ee153819e0b127362cd2654927deeef7f14263af844c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132809292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |