Negotiating academic conflict in discussion sections of doctoral dissertations

• Published in: Pragmatics and society 2024-11, Vol.15 (6), p.905-928
• Main Authors: Esmaili, F., Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic writing; Applied linguistics; Dissertations & theses; Negotiation
• ISSN: 1878-9714; 1878-9722
• DOI: 10.1075/ps.22060.esm

This study explores how doctoral students negotiated academic conflict (AC) in discussion section of their dissertations and what engagement resources they utilized to convey academic conflict. To this end, discussion chapters of 30 doctoral dissertations in Applied Linguistics (15 samples by each writer group) were analyzed using Huston’s (1991) academic conflict framework and Martin and White’s (2005) engagement system of Appraisal Theory. The functional analysis constituted discovering components of academic conflict and engagement resources in the discussions. We found that components of academic conflict determined engagement values used to convey them. The linguistic background of the authors was less of an issue in resolving conflicts. The two writer groups managed academic conflict and related engagement resources more or less similarly in different components of academic conflict. They mainly expressed their novel contribution readily and identified the flaws of previous research; however, both writer groups showed little tendency to explain controversial points. The findings have pedagogical implications for academic writing courses highlighting the importance of developing awareness of AC and resolving the conflicts.