Loading…
Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights
This study explores the fusion of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods within anti–money laundering (AML) frameworks using data from the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). ML and deep learning (DL) algorithms—such as random forest classifier, elast...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems 2024-04, Vol.17 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1a6fcff37375daf5e59eea490c73a383b658d224da9b063e47e07ee8ef4b0f73 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Gandhi, Hitarth Tandon, Kevin Gite, Shilpa Pradhan, Biswajeet Alamri, Abdullah |
description | This study explores the fusion of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods within anti–money laundering (AML) frameworks using data from the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). ML and deep learning (DL) algorithms—such as random forest classifier, elastic net regressor, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest regressor, and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were used to forecast variables such as state, year, and transaction types (credit card and debit card). Hyperparameter tuning through grid search and randomized search was used to optimize model performance. The results demonstrated the efficacy of AI/ML algorithms in predicting temporal, spatial, and industry-specific money-laundering patterns. The random forest classifier achieved 99.99% average accuracy in state prediction, while the gradient boosting regressor and random forest classifier excelled in predicting year and state simultaneously, and credit card transactions, respectively. MLP and CNN showed promise in the context of debit card transactions. The gradient boosting regressor performed competitively with low mean squared error (MSE) (2.9) and the highest
-squared (
) value of 0.24, showcasing its pattern-capturing proficiency. Logistic regression and random forest classifier performed well in predicting credit card transactions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC_AUC) scores of 0.55 and 0.53, respectively. For debit card prediction, MLP achieved a precision of 0.55 and recall of 0.42, while CNN showed a precision of 0.6 and recall of 0.54, highlighting their effectiveness. The study recommends interpretability, hyperparameter optimization, specialized models, ensemble methods, data augmentation, and real-time monitoring for improved adaptability to evolving financial crime patterns. Future improvements could include exploring the integration of blockchain technology in AML. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/ijssis-2024-0024 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3134894425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3089917777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1a6fcff37375daf5e59eea490c73a383b658d224da9b063e47e07ee8ef4b0f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AUDKJgqb17XPAcu5vdZBM9heJHIdWLnsMmeZtuaTZ1d9uam__Bf-gvMSWCIugc3ht4M_NgPO-c4MuA8XiqVtYq6wc4YD7ux5E3IoTHfhjh-PgHP_Um1q5wD5oEnEQjr34QO1ULp3SN3BLQrG02a3hVrkOtRItWQ4cysdUVmF5yhVLt1Mfbe_PrgNJqJ3QJDWhn0V65JUrn00WG5tqqeunsmXcixdrC5GuPvefbm6fZvZ893s1naeaXAWXOL4iIZCkl5ZSHlZAhhAmAYAkuORU0pkUUxlUQsEokBY4oMA6YA8QgWYElp2PvYsjdmPZlC9blq3ZrdP8yp4SyOGEsCP9V4ThJCO_Rq_CgKk1rrQGZb4xqhOlygvND7_nQe37oPT_03luuB8terB2YCmqz7Xrynf-XlXBCPwFN6IyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3089917777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gandhi, Hitarth ; Tandon, Kevin ; Gite, Shilpa ; Pradhan, Biswajeet ; Alamri, Abdullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Hitarth ; Tandon, Kevin ; Gite, Shilpa ; Pradhan, Biswajeet ; Alamri, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the fusion of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods within anti–money laundering (AML) frameworks using data from the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). ML and deep learning (DL) algorithms—such as random forest classifier, elastic net regressor, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest regressor, and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were used to forecast variables such as state, year, and transaction types (credit card and debit card). Hyperparameter tuning through grid search and randomized search was used to optimize model performance. The results demonstrated the efficacy of AI/ML algorithms in predicting temporal, spatial, and industry-specific money-laundering patterns. The random forest classifier achieved 99.99% average accuracy in state prediction, while the gradient boosting regressor and random forest classifier excelled in predicting year and state simultaneously, and credit card transactions, respectively. MLP and CNN showed promise in the context of debit card transactions. The gradient boosting regressor performed competitively with low mean squared error (MSE) (2.9) and the highest
-squared (
) value of 0.24, showcasing its pattern-capturing proficiency. Logistic regression and random forest classifier performed well in predicting credit card transactions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC_AUC) scores of 0.55 and 0.53, respectively. For debit card prediction, MLP achieved a precision of 0.55 and recall of 0.42, while CNN showed a precision of 0.6 and recall of 0.54, highlighting their effectiveness. The study recommends interpretability, hyperparameter optimization, specialized models, ensemble methods, data augmentation, and real-time monitoring for improved adaptability to evolving financial crime patterns. Future improvements could include exploring the integration of blockchain technology in AML.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-5608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-5608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/ijssis-2024-0024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Sciendo</publisher><subject>AI/ML ; Algorithms ; anti-money laundering ; Artificial intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; Credit cards ; Data augmentation ; Deep learning ; Effectiveness ; Ensemble learning ; FinCEN dataset ; Machine learning ; Money laundering ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Performance prediction ; Predictions ; Real time ; Recall ; Regression ; USA</subject><ispartof>International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems, 2024-04, Vol.17 (1)</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1a6fcff37375daf5e59eea490c73a383b658d224da9b063e47e07ee8ef4b0f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3089917777?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Hitarth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gite, Shilpa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Biswajeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamri, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><title>Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights</title><title>International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems</title><description>This study explores the fusion of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods within anti–money laundering (AML) frameworks using data from the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). ML and deep learning (DL) algorithms—such as random forest classifier, elastic net regressor, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest regressor, and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were used to forecast variables such as state, year, and transaction types (credit card and debit card). Hyperparameter tuning through grid search and randomized search was used to optimize model performance. The results demonstrated the efficacy of AI/ML algorithms in predicting temporal, spatial, and industry-specific money-laundering patterns. The random forest classifier achieved 99.99% average accuracy in state prediction, while the gradient boosting regressor and random forest classifier excelled in predicting year and state simultaneously, and credit card transactions, respectively. MLP and CNN showed promise in the context of debit card transactions. The gradient boosting regressor performed competitively with low mean squared error (MSE) (2.9) and the highest
-squared (
) value of 0.24, showcasing its pattern-capturing proficiency. Logistic regression and random forest classifier performed well in predicting credit card transactions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC_AUC) scores of 0.55 and 0.53, respectively. For debit card prediction, MLP achieved a precision of 0.55 and recall of 0.42, while CNN showed a precision of 0.6 and recall of 0.54, highlighting their effectiveness. The study recommends interpretability, hyperparameter optimization, specialized models, ensemble methods, data augmentation, and real-time monitoring for improved adaptability to evolving financial crime patterns. Future improvements could include exploring the integration of blockchain technology in AML.</description><subject>AI/ML</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>anti-money laundering</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Credit cards</subject><subject>Data augmentation</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Ensemble learning</subject><subject>FinCEN dataset</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Money laundering</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>1178-5608</issn><issn>1178-5608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AUDKJgqb17XPAcu5vdZBM9heJHIdWLnsMmeZtuaTZ1d9uam__Bf-gvMSWCIugc3ht4M_NgPO-c4MuA8XiqVtYq6wc4YD7ux5E3IoTHfhjh-PgHP_Um1q5wD5oEnEQjr34QO1ULp3SN3BLQrG02a3hVrkOtRItWQ4cysdUVmF5yhVLt1Mfbe_PrgNJqJ3QJDWhn0V65JUrn00WG5tqqeunsmXcixdrC5GuPvefbm6fZvZ893s1naeaXAWXOL4iIZCkl5ZSHlZAhhAmAYAkuORU0pkUUxlUQsEokBY4oMA6YA8QgWYElp2PvYsjdmPZlC9blq3ZrdP8yp4SyOGEsCP9V4ThJCO_Rq_CgKk1rrQGZb4xqhOlygvND7_nQe37oPT_03luuB8terB2YCmqz7Xrynf-XlXBCPwFN6IyU</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Gandhi, Hitarth</creator><creator>Tandon, Kevin</creator><creator>Gite, Shilpa</creator><creator>Pradhan, Biswajeet</creator><creator>Alamri, Abdullah</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights</title><author>Gandhi, Hitarth ; Tandon, Kevin ; Gite, Shilpa ; Pradhan, Biswajeet ; Alamri, Abdullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1a6fcff37375daf5e59eea490c73a383b658d224da9b063e47e07ee8ef4b0f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AI/ML</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>anti-money laundering</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Credit cards</topic><topic>Data augmentation</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Ensemble learning</topic><topic>FinCEN dataset</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Money laundering</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Hitarth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gite, Shilpa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Biswajeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamri, Abdullah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gandhi, Hitarth</au><au>Tandon, Kevin</au><au>Gite, Shilpa</au><au>Pradhan, Biswajeet</au><au>Alamri, Abdullah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights</atitle><jtitle>International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems</jtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1178-5608</issn><eissn>1178-5608</eissn><abstract>This study explores the fusion of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods within anti–money laundering (AML) frameworks using data from the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). ML and deep learning (DL) algorithms—such as random forest classifier, elastic net regressor, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest regressor, and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were used to forecast variables such as state, year, and transaction types (credit card and debit card). Hyperparameter tuning through grid search and randomized search was used to optimize model performance. The results demonstrated the efficacy of AI/ML algorithms in predicting temporal, spatial, and industry-specific money-laundering patterns. The random forest classifier achieved 99.99% average accuracy in state prediction, while the gradient boosting regressor and random forest classifier excelled in predicting year and state simultaneously, and credit card transactions, respectively. MLP and CNN showed promise in the context of debit card transactions. The gradient boosting regressor performed competitively with low mean squared error (MSE) (2.9) and the highest
-squared (
) value of 0.24, showcasing its pattern-capturing proficiency. Logistic regression and random forest classifier performed well in predicting credit card transactions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC_AUC) scores of 0.55 and 0.53, respectively. For debit card prediction, MLP achieved a precision of 0.55 and recall of 0.42, while CNN showed a precision of 0.6 and recall of 0.54, highlighting their effectiveness. The study recommends interpretability, hyperparameter optimization, specialized models, ensemble methods, data augmentation, and real-time monitoring for improved adaptability to evolving financial crime patterns. Future improvements could include exploring the integration of blockchain technology in AML.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/ijssis-2024-0024</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1178-5608 |
ispartof | International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems, 2024-04, Vol.17 (1) |
issn | 1178-5608 1178-5608 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3134894425 |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | AI/ML Algorithms anti-money laundering Artificial intelligence Artificial neural networks Credit cards Data augmentation Deep learning Effectiveness Ensemble learning FinCEN dataset Machine learning Money laundering Multilayer perceptrons Performance prediction Predictions Real time Recall Regression USA |
title | Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A44%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Navigating%20the%20Complexity%20of%20Money%20Laundering:%20Anti%E2%80%93money%20Laundering%20Advancements%20with%20AI/ML%20Insights&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20on%20smart%20sensing%20and%20intelligent%20systems&rft.au=Gandhi,%20Hitarth&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1178-5608&rft.eissn=1178-5608&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/ijssis-2024-0024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3089917777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1a6fcff37375daf5e59eea490c73a383b658d224da9b063e47e07ee8ef4b0f73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3089917777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |