Loading…

How are first‐generation students doing throughout their college years? An examination of academic success, retention, and completion rates

Previous research suggests that first‐generation (first‐gen) students may be at risk for lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and lower graduation rates compared to their continuing‐generation (continuing‐gen) peers. The current study analyzes academic success (average yearly GPA) and r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Analyses of social issues and public policy 2024-12, Vol.24 (3), p.1274-1287
Main Authors: Weisen, Shelby, Do, Tai, Peczuh, Marisa C., Hufnagle, Ashley S., Maruyama, Geoffrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2263-169a38634feea5817c3e7799e59985df8fa5003e40896340e05d23aa4c84ab563
container_end_page 1287
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1274
container_title Analyses of social issues and public policy
container_volume 24
creator Weisen, Shelby
Do, Tai
Peczuh, Marisa C.
Hufnagle, Ashley S.
Maruyama, Geoffrey
description Previous research suggests that first‐generation (first‐gen) students may be at risk for lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and lower graduation rates compared to their continuing‐generation (continuing‐gen) peers. The current study analyzes academic success (average yearly GPA) and retention/completion rates (cumulative dropouts and graduates) for four successive (2011–2014) entering first‐year cohorts at a large Midwestern Research 1 University. Across all cohorts, academic success varied by first‐gen status, with continuing‐gen students having significantly higher GPAs each year. A significantly greater percentage of first‐gen students dropped out each year. First‐gen status was also negatively related to graduation rates at 4, 5, and 6 years after college entry. Additional analyses disaggregated the data by seven colleges of admission with semi‐independent admissions policies. First‐gen status was more strongly related to academic success and retention for students in the following colleges: education, biological sciences, liberal arts, and science and engineering. Overall, findings suggest that first‐gen students are at higher risk of low performance and completion than their continuing‐gen peers. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to less successful outcomes for first‐gen students, and if programming could lessen these group differences. Public significance statement The current study finds that first‐generation undergraduate students are at higher risk of low academic performance and dropout compared to their continuing‐generation peers. Differences were also seen by college of admission, with some colleges having larger gaps between these groups than others. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to these outcomes for first‐generation students, and if programming could lessen these group differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/asap.12413
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3142571659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3142571659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2263-169a38634feea5817c3e7799e59985df8fa5003e40896340e05d23aa4c84ab563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhoMoWKsXn2DBmzR1N5tNsicJRa1QUFDPYdxM0pQkG3cTam--gOAz-iRujWfnMj_MN_8Pv-edMzpnbq7AQjdnQcj4gTdhglPfaXG414H04zCRx96JtRtKWZAwOfE-l3pLwCApKmP774-vEls00Fe6JbYfcmx7S3JdtSXp10YP5VoPvZNYGaJ0XWOJZIdg7DVJW4Lv0FTt-K0LAgpybCpF7KAUWjsjBnvn6M4zAm3uHJquxl_cZaI99Y4KqC2e_e2p93J787xY-quHu_tFuvJVEETcZ5EEnkQ8LBBBJCxWHONYShRSJiIvkgIEpRxDmkhHUaQiDzhAqJIQXkXEp97F6NsZ_Tag7bONHkzrIjPOwkDELBLSUZcjpYy21mCRdaZqwOwyRrN93dm-7uy3bgezEd5WNe7-IbP0KX0cf34ArYGFUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142571659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are first‐generation students doing throughout their college years? An examination of academic success, retention, and completion rates</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Weisen, Shelby ; Do, Tai ; Peczuh, Marisa C. ; Hufnagle, Ashley S. ; Maruyama, Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Weisen, Shelby ; Do, Tai ; Peczuh, Marisa C. ; Hufnagle, Ashley S. ; Maruyama, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research suggests that first‐generation (first‐gen) students may be at risk for lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and lower graduation rates compared to their continuing‐generation (continuing‐gen) peers. The current study analyzes academic success (average yearly GPA) and retention/completion rates (cumulative dropouts and graduates) for four successive (2011–2014) entering first‐year cohorts at a large Midwestern Research 1 University. Across all cohorts, academic success varied by first‐gen status, with continuing‐gen students having significantly higher GPAs each year. A significantly greater percentage of first‐gen students dropped out each year. First‐gen status was also negatively related to graduation rates at 4, 5, and 6 years after college entry. Additional analyses disaggregated the data by seven colleges of admission with semi‐independent admissions policies. First‐gen status was more strongly related to academic success and retention for students in the following colleges: education, biological sciences, liberal arts, and science and engineering. Overall, findings suggest that first‐gen students are at higher risk of low performance and completion than their continuing‐gen peers. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to less successful outcomes for first‐gen students, and if programming could lessen these group differences. Public significance statement The current study finds that first‐generation undergraduate students are at higher risk of low academic performance and dropout compared to their continuing‐generation peers. Differences were also seen by college of admission, with some colleges having larger gaps between these groups than others. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to these outcomes for first‐generation students, and if programming could lessen these group differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-2415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/asap.12413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; academic success ; Admissions policies ; Attrition ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; completion/graduation ; continuing‐generation ; first‐generation ; Generational differences ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Graduation rate ; Peers ; retention ; Risk ; School dropouts ; Science ; Students ; Success ; undergraduate ; Undergraduate students</subject><ispartof>Analyses of social issues and public policy, 2024-12, Vol.24 (3), p.1274-1287</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2263-169a38634feea5817c3e7799e59985df8fa5003e40896340e05d23aa4c84ab563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4031-3402 ; 0000-0002-5138-2622 ; 0000-0002-4421-3740 ; 0000-0003-0086-1292 ; 0000-0002-8367-6625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,33753</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weisen, Shelby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Tai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peczuh, Marisa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hufnagle, Ashley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>How are first‐generation students doing throughout their college years? An examination of academic success, retention, and completion rates</title><title>Analyses of social issues and public policy</title><description>Previous research suggests that first‐generation (first‐gen) students may be at risk for lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and lower graduation rates compared to their continuing‐generation (continuing‐gen) peers. The current study analyzes academic success (average yearly GPA) and retention/completion rates (cumulative dropouts and graduates) for four successive (2011–2014) entering first‐year cohorts at a large Midwestern Research 1 University. Across all cohorts, academic success varied by first‐gen status, with continuing‐gen students having significantly higher GPAs each year. A significantly greater percentage of first‐gen students dropped out each year. First‐gen status was also negatively related to graduation rates at 4, 5, and 6 years after college entry. Additional analyses disaggregated the data by seven colleges of admission with semi‐independent admissions policies. First‐gen status was more strongly related to academic success and retention for students in the following colleges: education, biological sciences, liberal arts, and science and engineering. Overall, findings suggest that first‐gen students are at higher risk of low performance and completion than their continuing‐gen peers. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to less successful outcomes for first‐gen students, and if programming could lessen these group differences. Public significance statement The current study finds that first‐generation undergraduate students are at higher risk of low academic performance and dropout compared to their continuing‐generation peers. Differences were also seen by college of admission, with some colleges having larger gaps between these groups than others. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to these outcomes for first‐generation students, and if programming could lessen these group differences.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>academic success</subject><subject>Admissions policies</subject><subject>Attrition</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>completion/graduation</subject><subject>continuing‐generation</subject><subject>first‐generation</subject><subject>Generational differences</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Graduation rate</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>retention</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>School dropouts</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>undergraduate</subject><subject>Undergraduate students</subject><issn>1529-7489</issn><issn>1530-2415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhoMoWKsXn2DBmzR1N5tNsicJRa1QUFDPYdxM0pQkG3cTam--gOAz-iRujWfnMj_MN_8Pv-edMzpnbq7AQjdnQcj4gTdhglPfaXG414H04zCRx96JtRtKWZAwOfE-l3pLwCApKmP774-vEls00Fe6JbYfcmx7S3JdtSXp10YP5VoPvZNYGaJ0XWOJZIdg7DVJW4Lv0FTt-K0LAgpybCpF7KAUWjsjBnvn6M4zAm3uHJquxl_cZaI99Y4KqC2e_e2p93J787xY-quHu_tFuvJVEETcZ5EEnkQ8LBBBJCxWHONYShRSJiIvkgIEpRxDmkhHUaQiDzhAqJIQXkXEp97F6NsZ_Tag7bONHkzrIjPOwkDELBLSUZcjpYy21mCRdaZqwOwyRrN93dm-7uy3bgezEd5WNe7-IbP0KX0cf34ArYGFUw</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Weisen, Shelby</creator><creator>Do, Tai</creator><creator>Peczuh, Marisa C.</creator><creator>Hufnagle, Ashley S.</creator><creator>Maruyama, Geoffrey</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-3402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-2622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-3740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-1292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-6625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>How are first‐generation students doing throughout their college years? An examination of academic success, retention, and completion rates</title><author>Weisen, Shelby ; Do, Tai ; Peczuh, Marisa C. ; Hufnagle, Ashley S. ; Maruyama, Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2263-169a38634feea5817c3e7799e59985df8fa5003e40896340e05d23aa4c84ab563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>academic success</topic><topic>Admissions policies</topic><topic>Attrition</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>completion/graduation</topic><topic>continuing‐generation</topic><topic>first‐generation</topic><topic>Generational differences</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Graduation rate</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>retention</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>School dropouts</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>undergraduate</topic><topic>Undergraduate students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weisen, Shelby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Tai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peczuh, Marisa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hufnagle, Ashley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Analyses of social issues and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weisen, Shelby</au><au>Do, Tai</au><au>Peczuh, Marisa C.</au><au>Hufnagle, Ashley S.</au><au>Maruyama, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are first‐generation students doing throughout their college years? An examination of academic success, retention, and completion rates</atitle><jtitle>Analyses of social issues and public policy</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1274</spage><epage>1287</epage><pages>1274-1287</pages><issn>1529-7489</issn><eissn>1530-2415</eissn><abstract>Previous research suggests that first‐generation (first‐gen) students may be at risk for lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and lower graduation rates compared to their continuing‐generation (continuing‐gen) peers. The current study analyzes academic success (average yearly GPA) and retention/completion rates (cumulative dropouts and graduates) for four successive (2011–2014) entering first‐year cohorts at a large Midwestern Research 1 University. Across all cohorts, academic success varied by first‐gen status, with continuing‐gen students having significantly higher GPAs each year. A significantly greater percentage of first‐gen students dropped out each year. First‐gen status was also negatively related to graduation rates at 4, 5, and 6 years after college entry. Additional analyses disaggregated the data by seven colleges of admission with semi‐independent admissions policies. First‐gen status was more strongly related to academic success and retention for students in the following colleges: education, biological sciences, liberal arts, and science and engineering. Overall, findings suggest that first‐gen students are at higher risk of low performance and completion than their continuing‐gen peers. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to less successful outcomes for first‐gen students, and if programming could lessen these group differences. Public significance statement The current study finds that first‐generation undergraduate students are at higher risk of low academic performance and dropout compared to their continuing‐generation peers. Differences were also seen by college of admission, with some colleges having larger gaps between these groups than others. Institutions need to examine why and how they are contributing to these outcomes for first‐generation students, and if programming could lessen these group differences.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/asap.12413</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-3402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-2622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-3740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-1292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-6625</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-7489
ispartof Analyses of social issues and public policy, 2024-12, Vol.24 (3), p.1274-1287
issn 1529-7489
1530-2415
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3142571659
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Academic achievement
academic success
Admissions policies
Attrition
College students
Colleges & universities
completion/graduation
continuing‐generation
first‐generation
Generational differences
Grades (Scholastic)
Graduation rate
Peers
retention
Risk
School dropouts
Science
Students
Success
undergraduate
Undergraduate students
title How are first‐generation students doing throughout their college years? An examination of academic success, retention, and completion rates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A04%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20first%E2%80%90generation%20students%20doing%20throughout%20their%20college%20years?%20An%20examination%20of%20academic%20success,%20retention,%20and%20completion%20rates&rft.jtitle=Analyses%20of%20social%20issues%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Weisen,%20Shelby&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1274&rft.epage=1287&rft.pages=1274-1287&rft.issn=1529-7489&rft.eissn=1530-2415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/asap.12413&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3142571659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2263-169a38634feea5817c3e7799e59985df8fa5003e40896340e05d23aa4c84ab563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142571659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true