Loading…

Comparison of Intraoperative ERCP vs Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones in an Under-resourced Setting

Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (IO-ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) are minimally invasive procedures used to extract common bile duct (CBD) stones and perform cholecystectomy in a single stage. There is no consensus as to which is the ideal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of surgery 2024, Vol.86 (5), p.938-943
Main Authors: Garza, Alberto Riojas, Rodriguez, H. Alejandro, Guajardo Nieto, Diego A., Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M., Urquijo, Mauricio González, Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón, Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran, Muñiz, José J., Shade, Mario Rodarte
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-f29baf4aab2af53755a1996f7f0d8ae09cfe7c8c57429059a5cce9b5002621933
container_end_page 943
container_issue 5
container_start_page 938
container_title Indian journal of surgery
container_volume 86
creator Garza, Alberto Riojas
Rodriguez, H. Alejandro
Guajardo Nieto, Diego A.
Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M.
Urquijo, Mauricio González
Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón
Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran
Muñiz, José J.
Shade, Mario Rodarte
description Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (IO-ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) are minimally invasive procedures used to extract common bile duct (CBD) stones and perform cholecystectomy in a single stage. There is no consensus as to which is the ideal method for CBD stone treatment and decisions are made based on surgeons’ preference and hospital protocols. Evidence in emergency and resource-constrained settings (where choledochoscopes may be unavailable) is limited. The objective of this study was to compare CBD clearance rates, intraoperative time, in-hospital stay (IHS) length, retained stones, and complications between IO-ERCP and LCBDE in patients with CBD stones in emergency settings at a lower-income health center. An observational ambispective cohort study was conducted in patients with acute abdominal pain diagnosed with CBD stones and treated with IO-ERCP or LCBDE at Hospital Metropolitano, Monterrey, Mexico, during a 3-year period. Seventy-four patients were analyzed (39 IO-ERCP, 35 LCBDE). CBD clearance, procedure time, and retained stones between IO-ERCP and LCBDE were not statistically different (79% vs 62%, p = 0.12; 205 vs 193 min, p = 0.95; five IO-ERCP and two LCBDE cases, p = 0.26). IO-ERCP had shorter IHS length (1 vs 2 days, p = 002). Postoperative complications were more common in IO-ERCP (5 vs 0 cases, p = 0.036). Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had similar common bile duct clearance and retained stone rates compared to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in emergency settings at a resource-constrained health center. IO-ERCP had a higher complication rate, yet with low impact on in-hospital stay length.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12262-023-03997-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3142600920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3142600920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-f29baf4aab2af53755a1996f7f0d8ae09cfe7c8c57429059a5cce9b5002621933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonRxFp9AVckrtE7MAxlaadVmzTRWLsmlEIzTQsjTI3Gl5e2Ju5ccUPOuT8fQtcF3BYA4i4VlFaUAGUEmJSC8BPUAykYkUKy00NNCYVqcI4uUloD0LJirIe-67BtdWxS8Dg4PPFd1KG1UXfNh8Xj1_oFfyQ81ZkJyYS2MTgb20wPm43Fo53p8Piz3YS9kX9diLgejvCsC94m3HisPZ77pY0k2hR20dglntmua_zqEp05vUn26vfto_nD-K1-ItPnx0l9PyWGCuiIo3KhXan1gmrHmeBcF1JWTjhYDrQFaZwVZmC4KKkELjU3xsoFzzdWtJCM9dHNsW8bw_vOpk6t8yI-j1SsKGkFIClkih4pky9N0TrVxmar45cqQO1DVseQVQ5ZHUJWPEvsKKUM-5WNf63_sX4AO8aAJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142600920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Intraoperative ERCP vs Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones in an Under-resourced Setting</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Garza, Alberto Riojas ; Rodriguez, H. Alejandro ; Guajardo Nieto, Diego A. ; Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M. ; Urquijo, Mauricio González ; Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón ; Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran ; Muñiz, José J. ; Shade, Mario Rodarte</creator><creatorcontrib>Garza, Alberto Riojas ; Rodriguez, H. Alejandro ; Guajardo Nieto, Diego A. ; Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M. ; Urquijo, Mauricio González ; Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón ; Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran ; Muñiz, José J. ; Shade, Mario Rodarte</creatorcontrib><description>Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (IO-ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) are minimally invasive procedures used to extract common bile duct (CBD) stones and perform cholecystectomy in a single stage. There is no consensus as to which is the ideal method for CBD stone treatment and decisions are made based on surgeons’ preference and hospital protocols. Evidence in emergency and resource-constrained settings (where choledochoscopes may be unavailable) is limited. The objective of this study was to compare CBD clearance rates, intraoperative time, in-hospital stay (IHS) length, retained stones, and complications between IO-ERCP and LCBDE in patients with CBD stones in emergency settings at a lower-income health center. An observational ambispective cohort study was conducted in patients with acute abdominal pain diagnosed with CBD stones and treated with IO-ERCP or LCBDE at Hospital Metropolitano, Monterrey, Mexico, during a 3-year period. Seventy-four patients were analyzed (39 IO-ERCP, 35 LCBDE). CBD clearance, procedure time, and retained stones between IO-ERCP and LCBDE were not statistically different (79% vs 62%, p = 0.12; 205 vs 193 min, p = 0.95; five IO-ERCP and two LCBDE cases, p = 0.26). IO-ERCP had shorter IHS length (1 vs 2 days, p = 002). Postoperative complications were more common in IO-ERCP (5 vs 0 cases, p = 0.036). Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had similar common bile duct clearance and retained stone rates compared to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in emergency settings at a resource-constrained health center. IO-ERCP had a higher complication rate, yet with low impact on in-hospital stay length.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-9793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12262-023-03997-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Bile ducts ; Cardiac Surgery ; Endoscopy ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Plastic Surgery ; Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgery, 2024, Vol.86 (5), p.938-943</ispartof><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2023 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-f29baf4aab2af53755a1996f7f0d8ae09cfe7c8c57429059a5cce9b5002621933</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8880-6484</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garza, Alberto Riojas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, H. Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guajardo Nieto, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquijo, Mauricio González</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñiz, José J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shade, Mario Rodarte</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Intraoperative ERCP vs Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones in an Under-resourced Setting</title><title>Indian journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><description>Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (IO-ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) are minimally invasive procedures used to extract common bile duct (CBD) stones and perform cholecystectomy in a single stage. There is no consensus as to which is the ideal method for CBD stone treatment and decisions are made based on surgeons’ preference and hospital protocols. Evidence in emergency and resource-constrained settings (where choledochoscopes may be unavailable) is limited. The objective of this study was to compare CBD clearance rates, intraoperative time, in-hospital stay (IHS) length, retained stones, and complications between IO-ERCP and LCBDE in patients with CBD stones in emergency settings at a lower-income health center. An observational ambispective cohort study was conducted in patients with acute abdominal pain diagnosed with CBD stones and treated with IO-ERCP or LCBDE at Hospital Metropolitano, Monterrey, Mexico, during a 3-year period. Seventy-four patients were analyzed (39 IO-ERCP, 35 LCBDE). CBD clearance, procedure time, and retained stones between IO-ERCP and LCBDE were not statistically different (79% vs 62%, p = 0.12; 205 vs 193 min, p = 0.95; five IO-ERCP and two LCBDE cases, p = 0.26). IO-ERCP had shorter IHS length (1 vs 2 days, p = 002). Postoperative complications were more common in IO-ERCP (5 vs 0 cases, p = 0.036). Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had similar common bile duct clearance and retained stone rates compared to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in emergency settings at a resource-constrained health center. IO-ERCP had a higher complication rate, yet with low impact on in-hospital stay length.</description><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>0972-2068</issn><issn>0973-9793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonRxFp9AVckrtE7MAxlaadVmzTRWLsmlEIzTQsjTI3Gl5e2Ju5ccUPOuT8fQtcF3BYA4i4VlFaUAGUEmJSC8BPUAykYkUKy00NNCYVqcI4uUloD0LJirIe-67BtdWxS8Dg4PPFd1KG1UXfNh8Xj1_oFfyQ81ZkJyYS2MTgb20wPm43Fo53p8Piz3YS9kX9diLgejvCsC94m3HisPZ77pY0k2hR20dglntmua_zqEp05vUn26vfto_nD-K1-ItPnx0l9PyWGCuiIo3KhXan1gmrHmeBcF1JWTjhYDrQFaZwVZmC4KKkELjU3xsoFzzdWtJCM9dHNsW8bw_vOpk6t8yI-j1SsKGkFIClkih4pky9N0TrVxmar45cqQO1DVseQVQ5ZHUJWPEvsKKUM-5WNf63_sX4AO8aAJg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Garza, Alberto Riojas</creator><creator>Rodriguez, H. Alejandro</creator><creator>Guajardo Nieto, Diego A.</creator><creator>Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M.</creator><creator>Urquijo, Mauricio González</creator><creator>Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón</creator><creator>Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran</creator><creator>Muñiz, José J.</creator><creator>Shade, Mario Rodarte</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-6484</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparison of Intraoperative ERCP vs Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones in an Under-resourced Setting</title><author>Garza, Alberto Riojas ; Rodriguez, H. Alejandro ; Guajardo Nieto, Diego A. ; Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M. ; Urquijo, Mauricio González ; Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón ; Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran ; Muñiz, José J. ; Shade, Mario Rodarte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-f29baf4aab2af53755a1996f7f0d8ae09cfe7c8c57429059a5cce9b5002621933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garza, Alberto Riojas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, H. Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guajardo Nieto, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urquijo, Mauricio González</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñiz, José J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shade, Mario Rodarte</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garza, Alberto Riojas</au><au>Rodriguez, H. Alejandro</au><au>Guajardo Nieto, Diego A.</au><au>Treviño Figueroa, Adriana M.</au><au>Urquijo, Mauricio González</au><au>Macías, Mario Enrique Rendón</au><au>Gidi, Ale Alam Gibran</au><au>Muñiz, José J.</au><au>Shade, Mario Rodarte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Intraoperative ERCP vs Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones in an Under-resourced Setting</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Surg</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>938</spage><epage>943</epage><pages>938-943</pages><issn>0972-2068</issn><eissn>0973-9793</eissn><abstract>Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (IO-ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) are minimally invasive procedures used to extract common bile duct (CBD) stones and perform cholecystectomy in a single stage. There is no consensus as to which is the ideal method for CBD stone treatment and decisions are made based on surgeons’ preference and hospital protocols. Evidence in emergency and resource-constrained settings (where choledochoscopes may be unavailable) is limited. The objective of this study was to compare CBD clearance rates, intraoperative time, in-hospital stay (IHS) length, retained stones, and complications between IO-ERCP and LCBDE in patients with CBD stones in emergency settings at a lower-income health center. An observational ambispective cohort study was conducted in patients with acute abdominal pain diagnosed with CBD stones and treated with IO-ERCP or LCBDE at Hospital Metropolitano, Monterrey, Mexico, during a 3-year period. Seventy-four patients were analyzed (39 IO-ERCP, 35 LCBDE). CBD clearance, procedure time, and retained stones between IO-ERCP and LCBDE were not statistically different (79% vs 62%, p = 0.12; 205 vs 193 min, p = 0.95; five IO-ERCP and two LCBDE cases, p = 0.26). IO-ERCP had shorter IHS length (1 vs 2 days, p = 002). Postoperative complications were more common in IO-ERCP (5 vs 0 cases, p = 0.036). Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had similar common bile duct clearance and retained stone rates compared to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in emergency settings at a resource-constrained health center. IO-ERCP had a higher complication rate, yet with low impact on in-hospital stay length.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><doi>10.1007/s12262-023-03997-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-6484</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-2068
ispartof Indian journal of surgery, 2024, Vol.86 (5), p.938-943
issn 0972-2068
0973-9793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3142600920
source Springer Link
subjects Bile ducts
Cardiac Surgery
Endoscopy
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Pediatric Surgery
Plastic Surgery
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
title Comparison of Intraoperative ERCP vs Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones in an Under-resourced Setting
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A10%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Intraoperative%20ERCP%20vs%20Laparoscopic%20Common%20Bile%20Duct%20Exploration%20for%20CBD%20Stones%20in%20an%20Under-resourced%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Garza,%20Alberto%20Riojas&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=938&rft.epage=943&rft.pages=938-943&rft.issn=0972-2068&rft.eissn=0973-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12262-023-03997-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3142600920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-f29baf4aab2af53755a1996f7f0d8ae09cfe7c8c57429059a5cce9b5002621933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142600920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true