Loading…
Collaborative Planning in the Context of Deindustrialization: A Qualitative Evaluation of Comparative Cases in Northeast Ohio
This article investigates whether and how the contexts of the Rust Belt decline extend collaborative planning theory. We evaluate two collaborative planning projects in Northeast Ohio: (1) the Cuyahoga Greenways (CG), a regional trails project and (2) the Mahoning River Corridor Initiative (MRCI), a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Calif.), 2025-01, Vol.61 (1), p.189-220 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-79f798f43774b8e398eade3337548268656edde8db44b19f60f5d8b8ee0d34143 |
container_end_page | 220 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Hilde, Thomas W. Ganning, Joanna P. Kellogg, Wendy A. Rubado, Meghan E. |
description | This article investigates whether and how the contexts of the Rust Belt decline extend collaborative planning theory. We evaluate two collaborative planning projects in Northeast Ohio: (1) the Cuyahoga Greenways (CG), a regional trails project and (2) the Mahoning River Corridor Initiative (MRCI), a postindustrial river restoration project. Based on participant interviews and document analysis, we find that the projects are distinct in their contextual conditions and collaborative processes, with CG better aligning with common expectations found in the literature. MRCI deviates from normative theory pertaining to collaborative planning; we discuss how this might relate to processes of institutional change. Our results suggest that the collaborative planning literature is insufficiently tailored to assess collaborative projects in the context of decline—particularly where there is controversy around the project and where collaborative institutions and networks are weak. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10780874241243033 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3142651779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10780874241243033</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3142651779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-79f798f43774b8e398eade3337548268656edde8db44b19f60f5d8b8ee0d34143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA1535apN6N-onDKeg1yVd0y2jS2aSDhX876Z24IV4dXI4z_sEXgDOMZpgzPklRlwgwRlhmDCKKD0AI5ymJBGUksP4jvekB47BifdrhBBBeToCX4VtW1lZJ4PeKfjUSmO0WUJtYFgpWFgT1HuAtoHXSpu688Fp2erPiFtzBafwuYtrGNI3O9l2P5c-UNjNVu69hfTK99JH66JX-gDnK21PwVEjW6_O9nMMXm9vXor7ZDa_eyims2RBMhYSnjc8Fw2jnLNKKJoLJWtFKeUpEyQTWZqpulairhircN5kqElrEUmFasowo2NwMXi3zr51yodybTtn4pclxYxkaawwjxQeqIWz3jvVlFunN9J9lBiVfcvln5ZjZjJkvFyqX-v_gW9Xm32D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142651779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaborative Planning in the Context of Deindustrialization: A Qualitative Evaluation of Comparative Cases in Northeast Ohio</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hilde, Thomas W. ; Ganning, Joanna P. ; Kellogg, Wendy A. ; Rubado, Meghan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilde, Thomas W. ; Ganning, Joanna P. ; Kellogg, Wendy A. ; Rubado, Meghan E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article investigates whether and how the contexts of the Rust Belt decline extend collaborative planning theory. We evaluate two collaborative planning projects in Northeast Ohio: (1) the Cuyahoga Greenways (CG), a regional trails project and (2) the Mahoning River Corridor Initiative (MRCI), a postindustrial river restoration project. Based on participant interviews and document analysis, we find that the projects are distinct in their contextual conditions and collaborative processes, with CG better aligning with common expectations found in the literature. MRCI deviates from normative theory pertaining to collaborative planning; we discuss how this might relate to processes of institutional change. Our results suggest that the collaborative planning literature is insufficiently tailored to assess collaborative projects in the context of decline—particularly where there is controversy around the project and where collaborative institutions and networks are weak.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10780874241243033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Context ; Deindustrialization ; Environmental restoration ; Industrial areas ; Institutional change ; Planning ; Postindustrial societies ; Qualitative analysis ; Regional planning ; Rivers</subject><ispartof>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025-01, Vol.61 (1), p.189-220</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-79f798f43774b8e398eade3337548268656edde8db44b19f60f5d8b8ee0d34143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6584-3066 ; 0000-0002-2495-7398</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilde, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganning, Joanna P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubado, Meghan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Collaborative Planning in the Context of Deindustrialization: A Qualitative Evaluation of Comparative Cases in Northeast Ohio</title><title>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</title><description>This article investigates whether and how the contexts of the Rust Belt decline extend collaborative planning theory. We evaluate two collaborative planning projects in Northeast Ohio: (1) the Cuyahoga Greenways (CG), a regional trails project and (2) the Mahoning River Corridor Initiative (MRCI), a postindustrial river restoration project. Based on participant interviews and document analysis, we find that the projects are distinct in their contextual conditions and collaborative processes, with CG better aligning with common expectations found in the literature. MRCI deviates from normative theory pertaining to collaborative planning; we discuss how this might relate to processes of institutional change. Our results suggest that the collaborative planning literature is insufficiently tailored to assess collaborative projects in the context of decline—particularly where there is controversy around the project and where collaborative institutions and networks are weak.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Deindustrialization</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Industrial areas</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Postindustrial societies</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><issn>1078-0874</issn><issn>1552-8332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA1535apN6N-onDKeg1yVd0y2jS2aSDhX876Z24IV4dXI4z_sEXgDOMZpgzPklRlwgwRlhmDCKKD0AI5ymJBGUksP4jvekB47BifdrhBBBeToCX4VtW1lZJ4PeKfjUSmO0WUJtYFgpWFgT1HuAtoHXSpu688Fp2erPiFtzBafwuYtrGNI3O9l2P5c-UNjNVu69hfTK99JH66JX-gDnK21PwVEjW6_O9nMMXm9vXor7ZDa_eyims2RBMhYSnjc8Fw2jnLNKKJoLJWtFKeUpEyQTWZqpulairhircN5kqElrEUmFasowo2NwMXi3zr51yodybTtn4pclxYxkaawwjxQeqIWz3jvVlFunN9J9lBiVfcvln5ZjZjJkvFyqX-v_gW9Xm32D</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Hilde, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Ganning, Joanna P.</creator><creator>Kellogg, Wendy A.</creator><creator>Rubado, Meghan E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-3066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-7398</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Collaborative Planning in the Context of Deindustrialization: A Qualitative Evaluation of Comparative Cases in Northeast Ohio</title><author>Hilde, Thomas W. ; Ganning, Joanna P. ; Kellogg, Wendy A. ; Rubado, Meghan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-79f798f43774b8e398eade3337548268656edde8db44b19f60f5d8b8ee0d34143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Deindustrialization</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Industrial areas</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Postindustrial societies</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilde, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganning, Joanna P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubado, Meghan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilde, Thomas W.</au><au>Ganning, Joanna P.</au><au>Kellogg, Wendy A.</au><au>Rubado, Meghan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaborative Planning in the Context of Deindustrialization: A Qualitative Evaluation of Comparative Cases in Northeast Ohio</atitle><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>189-220</pages><issn>1078-0874</issn><eissn>1552-8332</eissn><abstract>This article investigates whether and how the contexts of the Rust Belt decline extend collaborative planning theory. We evaluate two collaborative planning projects in Northeast Ohio: (1) the Cuyahoga Greenways (CG), a regional trails project and (2) the Mahoning River Corridor Initiative (MRCI), a postindustrial river restoration project. Based on participant interviews and document analysis, we find that the projects are distinct in their contextual conditions and collaborative processes, with CG better aligning with common expectations found in the literature. MRCI deviates from normative theory pertaining to collaborative planning; we discuss how this might relate to processes of institutional change. Our results suggest that the collaborative planning literature is insufficiently tailored to assess collaborative projects in the context of decline—particularly where there is controversy around the project and where collaborative institutions and networks are weak.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10780874241243033</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-3066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-7398</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0874 |
ispartof | Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025-01, Vol.61 (1), p.189-220 |
issn | 1078-0874 1552-8332 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3142651779 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Collaboration Context Deindustrialization Environmental restoration Industrial areas Institutional change Planning Postindustrial societies Qualitative analysis Regional planning Rivers |
title | Collaborative Planning in the Context of Deindustrialization: A Qualitative Evaluation of Comparative Cases in Northeast Ohio |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaborative%20Planning%20in%20the%20Context%20of%20Deindustrialization:%20A%20Qualitative%20Evaluation%20of%20Comparative%20Cases%20in%20Northeast%20Ohio&rft.jtitle=Urban%20affairs%20review%20(Thousand%20Oaks,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Hilde,%20Thomas%20W.&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=189-220&rft.issn=1078-0874&rft.eissn=1552-8332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10780874241243033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3142651779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-79f798f43774b8e398eade3337548268656edde8db44b19f60f5d8b8ee0d34143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142651779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10780874241243033&rfr_iscdi=true |