Loading…
The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning
Machine unlearning, the process of selectively removing data from trained models, is increasingly crucial for addressing privacy concerns and knowledge gaps post-deployment. Despite this importance, existing approaches are often heuristic and lack formal guarantees. In this paper, we analyze the fun...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2024-12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Youssef Allouah Kazdan, Joshua Guerraoui, Rachid Koyejo, Sanmi |
description | Machine unlearning, the process of selectively removing data from trained models, is increasingly crucial for addressing privacy concerns and knowledge gaps post-deployment. Despite this importance, existing approaches are often heuristic and lack formal guarantees. In this paper, we analyze the fundamental utility, time, and space complexity trade-offs of approximate unlearning, providing rigorous certification analogous to differential privacy. For in-distribution forget data -- data similar to the retain set -- we show that a surprisingly simple and general procedure, empirical risk minimization with output perturbation, achieves tight unlearning-utility-complexity trade-offs, addressing a previous theoretical gap on the separation from unlearning "for free" via differential privacy, which inherently facilitates the removal of such data. However, such techniques fail with out-of-distribution forget data -- data significantly different from the retain set -- where unlearning time complexity can exceed that of retraining, even for a single sample. To address this, we propose a new robust and noisy gradient descent variant that provably amortizes unlearning time complexity without compromising utility. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3144198143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3144198143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_31441981433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sKwjAURIMgWLT_EHAdaB7Vuq6KguJG1yVqalPiTc0D9O-t4ge4GubMmQFKGOeUFIKxEUq9b7MsY7M5y3OeoN2xUfgUtNHhhSVccWnvnVHPT7U13gL50kMMxNZkqX1w-hyDtoD38tJo6N9glHSg4TZBw1oar9JfjtF0vTqWG9I5-4jKh6q10UE_VZwKQRcFFZz_Z70B6V08zg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3144198143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</source><creator>Youssef Allouah ; Kazdan, Joshua ; Guerraoui, Rachid ; Koyejo, Sanmi</creator><creatorcontrib>Youssef Allouah ; Kazdan, Joshua ; Guerraoui, Rachid ; Koyejo, Sanmi</creatorcontrib><description>Machine unlearning, the process of selectively removing data from trained models, is increasingly crucial for addressing privacy concerns and knowledge gaps post-deployment. Despite this importance, existing approaches are often heuristic and lack formal guarantees. In this paper, we analyze the fundamental utility, time, and space complexity trade-offs of approximate unlearning, providing rigorous certification analogous to differential privacy. For in-distribution forget data -- data similar to the retain set -- we show that a surprisingly simple and general procedure, empirical risk minimization with output perturbation, achieves tight unlearning-utility-complexity trade-offs, addressing a previous theoretical gap on the separation from unlearning "for free" via differential privacy, which inherently facilitates the removal of such data. However, such techniques fail with out-of-distribution forget data -- data significantly different from the retain set -- where unlearning time complexity can exceed that of retraining, even for a single sample. To address this, we propose a new robust and noisy gradient descent variant that provably amortizes unlearning time complexity without compromising utility.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Complexity ; Privacy ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3144198143?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Youssef Allouah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazdan, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerraoui, Rachid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyejo, Sanmi</creatorcontrib><title>The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Machine unlearning, the process of selectively removing data from trained models, is increasingly crucial for addressing privacy concerns and knowledge gaps post-deployment. Despite this importance, existing approaches are often heuristic and lack formal guarantees. In this paper, we analyze the fundamental utility, time, and space complexity trade-offs of approximate unlearning, providing rigorous certification analogous to differential privacy. For in-distribution forget data -- data similar to the retain set -- we show that a surprisingly simple and general procedure, empirical risk minimization with output perturbation, achieves tight unlearning-utility-complexity trade-offs, addressing a previous theoretical gap on the separation from unlearning "for free" via differential privacy, which inherently facilitates the removal of such data. However, such techniques fail with out-of-distribution forget data -- data significantly different from the retain set -- where unlearning time complexity can exceed that of retraining, even for a single sample. To address this, we propose a new robust and noisy gradient descent variant that provably amortizes unlearning time complexity without compromising utility.</description><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi8sKwjAURIMgWLT_EHAdaB7Vuq6KguJG1yVqalPiTc0D9O-t4ge4GubMmQFKGOeUFIKxEUq9b7MsY7M5y3OeoN2xUfgUtNHhhSVccWnvnVHPT7U13gL50kMMxNZkqX1w-hyDtoD38tJo6N9glHSg4TZBw1oar9JfjtF0vTqWG9I5-4jKh6q10UE_VZwKQRcFFZz_Z70B6V08zg</recordid><startdate>20241212</startdate><enddate>20241212</enddate><creator>Youssef Allouah</creator><creator>Kazdan, Joshua</creator><creator>Guerraoui, Rachid</creator><creator>Koyejo, Sanmi</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241212</creationdate><title>The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning</title><author>Youssef Allouah ; Kazdan, Joshua ; Guerraoui, Rachid ; Koyejo, Sanmi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31441981433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Youssef Allouah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazdan, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerraoui, Rachid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyejo, Sanmi</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Youssef Allouah</au><au>Kazdan, Joshua</au><au>Guerraoui, Rachid</au><au>Koyejo, Sanmi</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-12-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Machine unlearning, the process of selectively removing data from trained models, is increasingly crucial for addressing privacy concerns and knowledge gaps post-deployment. Despite this importance, existing approaches are often heuristic and lack formal guarantees. In this paper, we analyze the fundamental utility, time, and space complexity trade-offs of approximate unlearning, providing rigorous certification analogous to differential privacy. For in-distribution forget data -- data similar to the retain set -- we show that a surprisingly simple and general procedure, empirical risk minimization with output perturbation, achieves tight unlearning-utility-complexity trade-offs, addressing a previous theoretical gap on the separation from unlearning "for free" via differential privacy, which inherently facilitates the removal of such data. However, such techniques fail with out-of-distribution forget data -- data significantly different from the retain set -- where unlearning time complexity can exceed that of retraining, even for a single sample. To address this, we propose a new robust and noisy gradient descent variant that provably amortizes unlearning time complexity without compromising utility.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-12 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3144198143 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫) |
subjects | Complexity Privacy Tradeoffs |
title | The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=The%20Utility%20and%20Complexity%20of%20In-%20and%20Out-of-Distribution%20Machine%20Unlearning&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Youssef%20Allouah&rft.date=2024-12-12&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3144198143%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_31441981433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3144198143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |