Loading…
Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis
Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground as a bas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pacific affairs 2017-09, Vol.90 (3), p.505-533 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 533 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Pacific affairs |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Hahn, Kyu S. Lee, Jihye Won, Inho Jang, Seulgi Lee, Joonhwan |
description | Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground
as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided.
Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less
regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have
relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or
Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes
will wane. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5509/2017903505 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3147176140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>paaf/paaf/2017/00000090/00000003/art00004</ingid><galeid>A507012731</galeid><jstor_id>44874508</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A507012731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdFrHCEQxqW00Ou1L30vSPsW2HRc9Xb3qSxJm4QmBEoCeRNPx4vHnm507-H--3rd0PShI-jg9_uG0SHkI4NTKaH7WgNrOuAS5CuyYA2TFedN95osADhUrWQPb8m7nLdQgjO-IOkq01-48THogfbB7_aZ-kDP0Qw-4DH9GRPqb7Snd5gnGh2dHpFeYMCkp9l27p3DhMEg1cEWLW6SHh-9KdpNXPvBTwd6eRhjcWaf35M3Tg8ZPzyfS3L_4_vd2WV1fXtxddZfV0aAnCrBudMtBwnaSbC1kEJrgyvUHastE816bVuxtk5YLTvLLHdyZbEWK2dEwwRfki9z3THFp31pXm3jPpWGs-LFzpoVE1CozzO10QMqH1yckjZm9E9KQgOsbso_Lcnpf6CyLO68iQGdL_f9v4aT2WBSzDmhU2PyO50OioE6Tkq9TKrAn2Z4m6eY_pJCtI2Q0Ba9n3UfNhgm_fKOUWs3b8dyCv5EB88JcKXTdEwE_w0kEaFh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147176140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Hahn, Kyu S. ; Lee, Jihye ; Won, Inho ; Jang, Seulgi ; Lee, Joonhwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Kyu S. ; Lee, Jihye ; Won, Inho ; Jang, Seulgi ; Lee, Joonhwan</creatorcontrib><description>Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground
as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided.
Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less
regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have
relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or
Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes
will wane.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0030-851X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5509/2017903505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vancouver: Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Analysis ; Attitudes ; Bias ; Democratization ; Descendants ; Election results ; Elections ; Generational differences ; Generational Effects ; Generations ; Geographical Mobility ; Hypotheses ; Ideology ; Implicit Association Test (iat) ; Implicit beliefs ; Intergenerational mobility ; Mobility ; Nominations ; Political ideologies ; Political parties ; Political Preference ; Political reform ; Preferences ; Preferential ballot ; Presidential elections ; Provinces ; Regional Attitudes ; Regionalism ; Regions ; Self interest ; Social identity ; South Korea ; Tests ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Pacific affairs, 2017-09, Vol.90 (3), p.505-533</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Pacific Affairs</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 The University of British Columbia - Pacific Affairs</rights><rights>Copyright Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44874508$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3147176140?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12826,12828,21368,21375,27905,27906,33204,33592,33966,43714,43929,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Kyu S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Inho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joonhwan</creatorcontrib><title>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</title><title>Pacific affairs</title><description>Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground
as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided.
Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less
regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have
relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or
Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes
will wane.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Descendants</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Generational differences</subject><subject>Generational Effects</subject><subject>Generations</subject><subject>Geographical Mobility</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Implicit Association Test (iat)</subject><subject>Implicit beliefs</subject><subject>Intergenerational mobility</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Political ideologies</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political Preference</subject><subject>Political reform</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Preferential ballot</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Regional Attitudes</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Social identity</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>0030-851X</issn><issn>1715-3379</issn><issn>0030-851X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdFrHCEQxqW00Ou1L30vSPsW2HRc9Xb3qSxJm4QmBEoCeRNPx4vHnm507-H--3rd0PShI-jg9_uG0SHkI4NTKaH7WgNrOuAS5CuyYA2TFedN95osADhUrWQPb8m7nLdQgjO-IOkq01-48THogfbB7_aZ-kDP0Qw-4DH9GRPqb7Snd5gnGh2dHpFeYMCkp9l27p3DhMEg1cEWLW6SHh-9KdpNXPvBTwd6eRhjcWaf35M3Tg8ZPzyfS3L_4_vd2WV1fXtxddZfV0aAnCrBudMtBwnaSbC1kEJrgyvUHastE816bVuxtk5YLTvLLHdyZbEWK2dEwwRfki9z3THFp31pXm3jPpWGs-LFzpoVE1CozzO10QMqH1yckjZm9E9KQgOsbso_Lcnpf6CyLO68iQGdL_f9v4aT2WBSzDmhU2PyO50OioE6Tkq9TKrAn2Z4m6eY_pJCtI2Q0Ba9n3UfNhgm_fKOUWs3b8dyCv5EB88JcKXTdEwE_w0kEaFh</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Hahn, Kyu S.</creator><creator>Lee, Jihye</creator><creator>Won, Inho</creator><creator>Jang, Seulgi</creator><creator>Lee, Joonhwan</creator><general>Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British</general><general>The University of British Columbia</general><general>The University of British Columbia - Pacific Affairs</general><general>Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</title><author>Hahn, Kyu S. ; Lee, Jihye ; Won, Inho ; Jang, Seulgi ; Lee, Joonhwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Descendants</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Generational differences</topic><topic>Generational Effects</topic><topic>Generations</topic><topic>Geographical Mobility</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Implicit Association Test (iat)</topic><topic>Implicit beliefs</topic><topic>Intergenerational mobility</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Political ideologies</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political Preference</topic><topic>Political reform</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Preferential ballot</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Regional Attitudes</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Social identity</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Kyu S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Inho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joonhwan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Pacific affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hahn, Kyu S.</au><au>Lee, Jihye</au><au>Won, Inho</au><au>Jang, Seulgi</au><au>Lee, Joonhwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Pacific affairs</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>505-533</pages><issn>0030-851X</issn><eissn>1715-3379</eissn><eissn>0030-851X</eissn><abstract>Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground
as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided.
Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less
regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have
relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or
Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes
will wane.</abstract><cop>Vancouver</cop><pub>Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British</pub><doi>10.5509/2017903505</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-851X |
ispartof | Pacific affairs, 2017-09, Vol.90 (3), p.505-533 |
issn | 0030-851X 1715-3379 0030-851X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3147176140 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Age differences Analysis Attitudes Bias Democratization Descendants Election results Elections Generational differences Generational Effects Generations Geographical Mobility Hypotheses Ideology Implicit Association Test (iat) Implicit beliefs Intergenerational mobility Mobility Nominations Political ideologies Political parties Political Preference Political reform Preferences Preferential ballot Presidential elections Provinces Regional Attitudes Regionalism Regions Self interest Social identity South Korea Tests Voters |
title | Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Regional%20Animus%20in%20Decline%20in%20Korea?%20A%20Test%20of%20the%20Generational%20Difference%20and%20Geographical%20Mobility%20Hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Pacific%20affairs&rft.au=Hahn,%20Kyu%20S.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=505-533&rft.issn=0030-851X&rft.eissn=1715-3379&rft_id=info:doi/10.5509/2017903505&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA507012731%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147176140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A507012731&rft_ingid=paaf/paaf/2017/00000090/00000003/art00004&rft_jstor_id=44874508&rfr_iscdi=true |