Loading…

Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis

Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground as a bas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacific affairs 2017-09, Vol.90 (3), p.505-533
Main Authors: Hahn, Kyu S., Lee, Jihye, Won, Inho, Jang, Seulgi, Lee, Joonhwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143
cites
container_end_page 533
container_issue 3
container_start_page 505
container_title Pacific affairs
container_volume 90
creator Hahn, Kyu S.
Lee, Jihye
Won, Inho
Jang, Seulgi
Lee, Joonhwan
description Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided. Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes will wane.
doi_str_mv 10.5509/2017903505
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3147176140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>paaf/paaf/2017/00000090/00000003/art00004</ingid><galeid>A507012731</galeid><jstor_id>44874508</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A507012731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdFrHCEQxqW00Ou1L30vSPsW2HRc9Xb3qSxJm4QmBEoCeRNPx4vHnm507-H--3rd0PShI-jg9_uG0SHkI4NTKaH7WgNrOuAS5CuyYA2TFedN95osADhUrWQPb8m7nLdQgjO-IOkq01-48THogfbB7_aZ-kDP0Qw-4DH9GRPqb7Snd5gnGh2dHpFeYMCkp9l27p3DhMEg1cEWLW6SHh-9KdpNXPvBTwd6eRhjcWaf35M3Tg8ZPzyfS3L_4_vd2WV1fXtxddZfV0aAnCrBudMtBwnaSbC1kEJrgyvUHastE816bVuxtk5YLTvLLHdyZbEWK2dEwwRfki9z3THFp31pXm3jPpWGs-LFzpoVE1CozzO10QMqH1yckjZm9E9KQgOsbso_Lcnpf6CyLO68iQGdL_f9v4aT2WBSzDmhU2PyO50OioE6Tkq9TKrAn2Z4m6eY_pJCtI2Q0Ba9n3UfNhgm_fKOUWs3b8dyCv5EB88JcKXTdEwE_w0kEaFh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147176140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Hahn, Kyu S. ; Lee, Jihye ; Won, Inho ; Jang, Seulgi ; Lee, Joonhwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Kyu S. ; Lee, Jihye ; Won, Inho ; Jang, Seulgi ; Lee, Joonhwan</creatorcontrib><description>Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided. Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes will wane.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0030-851X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5509/2017903505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vancouver: Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Analysis ; Attitudes ; Bias ; Democratization ; Descendants ; Election results ; Elections ; Generational differences ; Generational Effects ; Generations ; Geographical Mobility ; Hypotheses ; Ideology ; Implicit Association Test (iat) ; Implicit beliefs ; Intergenerational mobility ; Mobility ; Nominations ; Political ideologies ; Political parties ; Political Preference ; Political reform ; Preferences ; Preferential ballot ; Presidential elections ; Provinces ; Regional Attitudes ; Regionalism ; Regions ; Self interest ; Social identity ; South Korea ; Tests ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Pacific affairs, 2017-09, Vol.90 (3), p.505-533</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Pacific Affairs</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 The University of British Columbia - Pacific Affairs</rights><rights>Copyright Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44874508$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3147176140?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12826,12828,21368,21375,27905,27906,33204,33592,33966,43714,43929,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Kyu S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Inho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joonhwan</creatorcontrib><title>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</title><title>Pacific affairs</title><description>Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided. Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes will wane.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Descendants</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Generational differences</subject><subject>Generational Effects</subject><subject>Generations</subject><subject>Geographical Mobility</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Implicit Association Test (iat)</subject><subject>Implicit beliefs</subject><subject>Intergenerational mobility</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Political ideologies</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political Preference</subject><subject>Political reform</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Preferential ballot</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Regional Attitudes</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Social identity</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>0030-851X</issn><issn>1715-3379</issn><issn>0030-851X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdFrHCEQxqW00Ou1L30vSPsW2HRc9Xb3qSxJm4QmBEoCeRNPx4vHnm507-H--3rd0PShI-jg9_uG0SHkI4NTKaH7WgNrOuAS5CuyYA2TFedN95osADhUrWQPb8m7nLdQgjO-IOkq01-48THogfbB7_aZ-kDP0Qw-4DH9GRPqb7Snd5gnGh2dHpFeYMCkp9l27p3DhMEg1cEWLW6SHh-9KdpNXPvBTwd6eRhjcWaf35M3Tg8ZPzyfS3L_4_vd2WV1fXtxddZfV0aAnCrBudMtBwnaSbC1kEJrgyvUHastE816bVuxtk5YLTvLLHdyZbEWK2dEwwRfki9z3THFp31pXm3jPpWGs-LFzpoVE1CozzO10QMqH1yckjZm9E9KQgOsbso_Lcnpf6CyLO68iQGdL_f9v4aT2WBSzDmhU2PyO50OioE6Tkq9TKrAn2Z4m6eY_pJCtI2Q0Ba9n3UfNhgm_fKOUWs3b8dyCv5EB88JcKXTdEwE_w0kEaFh</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Hahn, Kyu S.</creator><creator>Lee, Jihye</creator><creator>Won, Inho</creator><creator>Jang, Seulgi</creator><creator>Lee, Joonhwan</creator><general>Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British</general><general>The University of British Columbia</general><general>The University of British Columbia - Pacific Affairs</general><general>Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</title><author>Hahn, Kyu S. ; Lee, Jihye ; Won, Inho ; Jang, Seulgi ; Lee, Joonhwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Descendants</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Generational differences</topic><topic>Generational Effects</topic><topic>Generations</topic><topic>Geographical Mobility</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Implicit Association Test (iat)</topic><topic>Implicit beliefs</topic><topic>Intergenerational mobility</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Political ideologies</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political Preference</topic><topic>Political reform</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Preferential ballot</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Regional Attitudes</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Social identity</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Kyu S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Inho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joonhwan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Pacific affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hahn, Kyu S.</au><au>Lee, Jihye</au><au>Won, Inho</au><au>Jang, Seulgi</au><au>Lee, Joonhwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Pacific affairs</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>505-533</pages><issn>0030-851X</issn><eissn>1715-3379</eissn><eissn>0030-851X</eissn><abstract>Since the 1987 democratic reform, regional attitudes toward the two southern provinces have been regarded as the most significant determinant of South Korean voters' political preferences. In recent years, however, many scholars have speculated that regional animus is losing its ground as a basis for political judgment and will eventually be replaced by other politically relevant factors such as political ideology and issue preference. Others raise questions about the validity of this kind of "revisionist" argument, noting that election outcomes remain regionally divided. Adopting the implicit association test (IAT) as a measure of regional attitudes, we provide an empirical test to measure the effects of the emergence of new generations and geographical mobility in South Korean voters' regional attitudes. Our results show that younger Korean voters are less regionally biased toward either of the two southern provinces. The only exception was the younger generation in the Honam region: they held even higher levels of animus toward Yeongnam than their older counterparts. Geographical mobility also seems to decrease regional bias. Those who have relocated to other provinces showed less regional bias when compared with the natives of Yeongnam and Honam still residing in their respective regions. Likewise, our results show that the inter-generational transfer of regional animus is not overwhelming. For the descendants of Yeongnam or Honam natives residing in another province, their family's region of origin mattered little. In short, our findings suggest that changing generational composition and geographical mobility are likely to lessen the severity of regional animus and the political significance of regional attitudes will wane.</abstract><cop>Vancouver</cop><pub>Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British</pub><doi>10.5509/2017903505</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-851X
ispartof Pacific affairs, 2017-09, Vol.90 (3), p.505-533
issn 0030-851X
1715-3379
0030-851X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3147176140
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Age differences
Analysis
Attitudes
Bias
Democratization
Descendants
Election results
Elections
Generational differences
Generational Effects
Generations
Geographical Mobility
Hypotheses
Ideology
Implicit Association Test (iat)
Implicit beliefs
Intergenerational mobility
Mobility
Nominations
Political ideologies
Political parties
Political Preference
Political reform
Preferences
Preferential ballot
Presidential elections
Provinces
Regional Attitudes
Regionalism
Regions
Self interest
Social identity
South Korea
Tests
Voters
title Is Regional Animus in Decline in Korea? A Test of the Generational Difference and Geographical Mobility Hypothesis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Regional%20Animus%20in%20Decline%20in%20Korea?%20A%20Test%20of%20the%20Generational%20Difference%20and%20Geographical%20Mobility%20Hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Pacific%20affairs&rft.au=Hahn,%20Kyu%20S.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=505-533&rft.issn=0030-851X&rft.eissn=1715-3379&rft_id=info:doi/10.5509/2017903505&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA507012731%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-433fa83050af50d2454aace6ea912d147bbd84bdf4da59d1d3f56de246fc47143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147176140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A507012731&rft_ingid=paaf/paaf/2017/00000090/00000003/art00004&rft_jstor_id=44874508&rfr_iscdi=true