Who Is Perceived as Deserving? How Social Identities Shape Attitudes about Disaster Assistance in the United States

• Published in: PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2024-11, Vol.57 (4), p.521-528
• Main Authors: Ross, Ashley D., Rouse, Stella M., Alcañiz, Isabella, Marchevsky, Alejandra
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitudes; Beliefs; Citizenship; Climate; Climate change; Control Groups; Disaster relief; Disasters; Ethnic Groups; Ethnic identity; Ethnicity; Experimental Groups; Experiments; Federal Government; Funding; Hispanic Americans; Hurricanes; Hypotheses; Immigrants; National Surveys; Natural disasters; Noncitizens; Partisanship; Perceptions; Polarization; Politics; Polls & surveys; Predominantly White Institutions; Public opinion; Public Support; Puerto Ricans; Race; Racial Attitudes; Respondents; Social identity; Special Issue on Climate Change and Vulnerable Populations; State Surveys; Storm damage; Vignettes; Voters; Welfare Services
• ISSN: 1049-0965; 1537-5935
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049096524000362

Research has shown that as the size of government assistance programs grow, and the recipients of such programs are increasingly non-white and/or non-citizen, public support for them declines. Our study examines this phenomenon on the question of deservingness in federal disaster assistance. Using a 2018 survey experiment that leverages two devastating hurricanes—Hurricane Maria and Hurricane Harvey—that hit different parts of the United States in 2017, we explore how the social identities of race/ethnicity and partisanship affect attitudes about disaster deservingness. Our results demonstrate that although federal disaster assistance has broad support, it is contingent on perceptions about the disaster victim and the type of assistance. Respondents were less likely to support disaster assistance to Hurricane Maria–affected people than those affected by Hurricane Harvey. Moreover, white and Republican respondents were more likely to favor market-based assistance whereas race-/ethnic-minority and Democratic respondents were more likely to support more generous forms of disaster assistance. These findings have important implications for the allocation of disaster funds as climate change intensifies and the frequency of billion-dollar disaster events increases. This is exacerbated by political polarization and heightened social vulnerability due to changing population demographics.