Loading…

Hearing "Number"? Relative Quantity Judgments Through the Echolocation by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2024-11, Vol.138 (4), p.214-231
Main Authors: Sakurai, Natsuko, Tomonaga, Masaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 231
container_issue 4
container_start_page 214
container_title Journal of comparative psychology (1983)
container_volume 138
creator Sakurai, Natsuko
Tomonaga, Masaki
description Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickness (e.g., the number of objects). It is also unclear whether Weber's law (i.e., ratio dependency) holds for quantity discrimination through echolocation. In this study, we examined relative quantity judgments of visually occluded objects presented underwater by bottlenose dolphins. We found that they could discriminate pairs of same-sized objects ranging from one to eight, with performance improving as the difference ratio between the two numbers increased. In addition, their performance also improved as the magnitude of the number of objects involved increased. An additional test revealed that the accuracy of discrimination through echolocation was comparable to that of visual relative quantity judgments of the objects presented above water. On the other hand, under the condition that the overall size of each object (i.e., the sum of areas) was incongruent with the number of objects, performance was lower than when number and size were covarying. However, even within the incongruent condition, the effect of the number ratio was still observed, suggesting that the dolphins might have used various types of quantity information, such as number and size, flexibly to solve the task.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/com0000379
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3151893361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125556350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a305t-83390a0d5dfabde90852e39f7137e085a1d5794d101fb22a0627d9138b1c8e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLxDAQB_AgCq6rFz9B0IuK1aTTNM1JfD9YFGXvIW3TbaXb1DyE_fZmWcGbcxkGfswMf4QOKbmgBPhlZZYkFnCxhSZUgEhSUvBtNCEcWMIJ5Ltoz7nPaHKa8QmyT1rZbljgo9ewLLU9usIfule--9b4PajBd36FX0K9WOrBOzxvrQmLFvtW4_uqNb2pojUDLlf4xnjf68E4je9MP7bd4PDJPFjXmdFhb8MQbXCn-2inUb3TB799iuYP9_Pbp2T29vh8ez1LFBDmkwJAEEVqVjeqrLUgBUs1iIZT4DoOitaMi6ymhDZlmiqSp7wWFIqSVoXOYIqON2tHa76Cdl5-mmCHeFECZbQQADn9X6WMsRwYiepsoyprnLO6kaPtlsquJCVyHbz8Cz7i8w1Wo5KjW1XK-q7qtauCtTHFtZXxT5nJlGbwA4ePhTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125556350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hearing "Number"? Relative Quantity Judgments Through the Echolocation by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Sakurai, Natsuko ; Tomonaga, Masaki</creator><contributor>Beran, Michael J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sakurai, Natsuko ; Tomonaga, Masaki ; Beran, Michael J</creatorcontrib><description>Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickness (e.g., the number of objects). It is also unclear whether Weber's law (i.e., ratio dependency) holds for quantity discrimination through echolocation. In this study, we examined relative quantity judgments of visually occluded objects presented underwater by bottlenose dolphins. We found that they could discriminate pairs of same-sized objects ranging from one to eight, with performance improving as the difference ratio between the two numbers increased. In addition, their performance also improved as the magnitude of the number of objects involved increased. An additional test revealed that the accuracy of discrimination through echolocation was comparable to that of visual relative quantity judgments of the objects presented above water. On the other hand, under the condition that the overall size of each object (i.e., the sum of areas) was incongruent with the number of objects, performance was lower than when number and size were covarying. However, even within the incongruent condition, the effect of the number ratio was still observed, suggesting that the dolphins might have used various types of quantity information, such as number and size, flexibly to solve the task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Discrimination ; Dolphins ; Dolphins &amp; porpoises ; Echolocation ; Female ; Judgment ; Size Discrimination ; Visual Discrimination</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2024-11, Vol.138 (4), p.214-231</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9319-6991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Beran, Michael J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sakurai, Natsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomonaga, Masaki</creatorcontrib><title>Hearing "Number"? Relative Quantity Judgments Through the Echolocation by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><description>Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickness (e.g., the number of objects). It is also unclear whether Weber's law (i.e., ratio dependency) holds for quantity discrimination through echolocation. In this study, we examined relative quantity judgments of visually occluded objects presented underwater by bottlenose dolphins. We found that they could discriminate pairs of same-sized objects ranging from one to eight, with performance improving as the difference ratio between the two numbers increased. In addition, their performance also improved as the magnitude of the number of objects involved increased. An additional test revealed that the accuracy of discrimination through echolocation was comparable to that of visual relative quantity judgments of the objects presented above water. On the other hand, under the condition that the overall size of each object (i.e., the sum of areas) was incongruent with the number of objects, performance was lower than when number and size were covarying. However, even within the incongruent condition, the effect of the number ratio was still observed, suggesting that the dolphins might have used various types of quantity information, such as number and size, flexibly to solve the task.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Dolphins</subject><subject>Dolphins &amp; porpoises</subject><subject>Echolocation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Size Discrimination</subject><subject>Visual Discrimination</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EtLxDAQB_AgCq6rFz9B0IuK1aTTNM1JfD9YFGXvIW3TbaXb1DyE_fZmWcGbcxkGfswMf4QOKbmgBPhlZZYkFnCxhSZUgEhSUvBtNCEcWMIJ5Ltoz7nPaHKa8QmyT1rZbljgo9ewLLU9usIfule--9b4PajBd36FX0K9WOrBOzxvrQmLFvtW4_uqNb2pojUDLlf4xnjf68E4je9MP7bd4PDJPFjXmdFhb8MQbXCn-2inUb3TB799iuYP9_Pbp2T29vh8ez1LFBDmkwJAEEVqVjeqrLUgBUs1iIZT4DoOitaMi6ymhDZlmiqSp7wWFIqSVoXOYIqON2tHa76Cdl5-mmCHeFECZbQQADn9X6WMsRwYiepsoyprnLO6kaPtlsquJCVyHbz8Cz7i8w1Wo5KjW1XK-q7qtauCtTHFtZXxT5nJlGbwA4ePhTw</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Sakurai, Natsuko</creator><creator>Tomonaga, Masaki</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-6991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Hearing "Number"? Relative Quantity Judgments Through the Echolocation by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)</title><author>Sakurai, Natsuko ; Tomonaga, Masaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a305t-83390a0d5dfabde90852e39f7137e085a1d5794d101fb22a0627d9138b1c8e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Dolphins</topic><topic>Dolphins &amp; porpoises</topic><topic>Echolocation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Size Discrimination</topic><topic>Visual Discrimination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakurai, Natsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomonaga, Masaki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakurai, Natsuko</au><au>Tomonaga, Masaki</au><au>Beran, Michael J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hearing "Number"? Relative Quantity Judgments Through the Echolocation by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>214-231</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickness (e.g., the number of objects). It is also unclear whether Weber's law (i.e., ratio dependency) holds for quantity discrimination through echolocation. In this study, we examined relative quantity judgments of visually occluded objects presented underwater by bottlenose dolphins. We found that they could discriminate pairs of same-sized objects ranging from one to eight, with performance improving as the difference ratio between the two numbers increased. In addition, their performance also improved as the magnitude of the number of objects involved increased. An additional test revealed that the accuracy of discrimination through echolocation was comparable to that of visual relative quantity judgments of the objects presented above water. On the other hand, under the condition that the overall size of each object (i.e., the sum of areas) was incongruent with the number of objects, performance was lower than when number and size were covarying. However, even within the incongruent condition, the effect of the number ratio was still observed, suggesting that the dolphins might have used various types of quantity information, such as number and size, flexibly to solve the task.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/com0000379</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-6991</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7036
ispartof Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2024-11, Vol.138 (4), p.214-231
issn 0735-7036
1939-2087
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3151893361
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Animal
Discrimination
Dolphins
Dolphins & porpoises
Echolocation
Female
Judgment
Size Discrimination
Visual Discrimination
title Hearing "Number"? Relative Quantity Judgments Through the Echolocation by Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hearing%20%22Number%22?%20Relative%20Quantity%20Judgments%20Through%20the%20Echolocation%20by%20Bottlenose%20Dolphins%20(Tursiops%20truncatus)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Sakurai,%20Natsuko&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=214-231&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125556350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a305t-83390a0d5dfabde90852e39f7137e085a1d5794d101fb22a0627d9138b1c8e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125556350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true