Loading…
Donald Trump's Clemencies: Unconventional Acts, Conventional Justifications
During his four years as President Donald Trump's use of the clemency power generated considerable controversy. Much scholarship documents the fact that he ignored the traditional procedures for reviewing and approving requests for pardons and commutations. Trump used clemency to favor a rogues...
Saved in:
Published in: | British Journal of American Legal Studies 2022-11, Vol.11 (1), p.173-207 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 207 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | British Journal of American Legal Studies |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Sarat, Austin Gottesfeld, Laura Kettles, Carolina Ward, Olivia |
description | During his four years as President Donald Trump's use of the clemency power generated considerable controversy. Much scholarship documents the fact that he ignored the traditional procedures for reviewing and approving requests for pardons and commutations. Trump used clemency to favor a rogues gallery of cronies, celebrities and those whose crimes showed particular contempt for the law. However, few scholars have examined the justifications he offered when he granted pardons and commutations. This paper fills that gap. We argue that because the clemency power sits uneasily with democracy and the rule of law, when Presidents use this power they feel the need to supply justifications. We report on a study of Trump's clemency justifications that suggests that while his clemencies themselves were often controversial and his means of communicating about them unconventional, the reasons he gave for them were generally quite conventional and continuous with the justifications offered by his predecessors for their pardons and commutations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/bjals-2022-0005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3155046305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3155046305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a126700105927859136c6df0a0289c9524f62091a44aa9a8c62a650c6e0d1e4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlkL1PwzAQxS0EElXpzBqJgYXQ88V2YiSGKuW7Eks7W67joFRpUuwE1P-ehCDRhYnpPvR-p3ePkHMK18jiZLre6NKHCIghAPAjMsKYypAngh0f9Kdk4n2xBoaUcwZsRF7mdaXLLFi6dru79EFa2q2tTGH9TbCqTF192Kopek0wM42_CtLD1XPrmyIvjO5nf0ZO8s6GnfzUMVnd3y3Tx3Dx-vCUzhahiWJsQk1RxAAUuMQ44ZJGwogsBw2YSCM5slwgSKoZ01rqxAjUgoMRFjJqmYnG5GK4u3P1e2t9ozZ16zo_XkXdX8BEBLxTTQeVcbX3zuZq54qtdntFQfWhqe_QVB-a6kPriNuB-NRlY11m31y775rf83-QlCKNo__wtOe_ACIkh10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155046305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donald Trump's Clemencies: Unconventional Acts, Conventional Justifications</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Sarat, Austin ; Gottesfeld, Laura ; Kettles, Carolina ; Ward, Olivia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin ; Gottesfeld, Laura ; Kettles, Carolina ; Ward, Olivia</creatorcontrib><description>During his four years as President Donald Trump's use of the clemency power generated considerable controversy. Much scholarship documents the fact that he ignored the traditional procedures for reviewing and approving requests for pardons and commutations. Trump used clemency to favor a rogues gallery of cronies, celebrities and those whose crimes showed particular contempt for the law. However, few scholars have examined the justifications he offered when he granted pardons and commutations. This paper fills that gap. We argue that because the clemency power sits uneasily with democracy and the rule of law, when Presidents use this power they feel the need to supply justifications. We report on a study of Trump's clemency justifications that suggests that while his clemencies themselves were often controversial and his means of communicating about them unconventional, the reasons he gave for them were generally quite conventional and continuous with the justifications offered by his predecessors for their pardons and commutations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2719-5864</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2719-5864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2022-0005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Birmingham: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Arpaio, Joe ; Attorneys ; Clemency ; Immigration ; Pardons ; Political activism ; Political campaigns ; Presidents ; rehabilitation ; retribution ; rhetoric ; Scandals ; Trump, Donald J</subject><ispartof>British Journal of American Legal Studies, 2022-11, Vol.11 (1), p.173-207</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3155046305?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottesfeld, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettles, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Olivia</creatorcontrib><title>Donald Trump's Clemencies: Unconventional Acts, Conventional Justifications</title><title>British Journal of American Legal Studies</title><description>During his four years as President Donald Trump's use of the clemency power generated considerable controversy. Much scholarship documents the fact that he ignored the traditional procedures for reviewing and approving requests for pardons and commutations. Trump used clemency to favor a rogues gallery of cronies, celebrities and those whose crimes showed particular contempt for the law. However, few scholars have examined the justifications he offered when he granted pardons and commutations. This paper fills that gap. We argue that because the clemency power sits uneasily with democracy and the rule of law, when Presidents use this power they feel the need to supply justifications. We report on a study of Trump's clemency justifications that suggests that while his clemencies themselves were often controversial and his means of communicating about them unconventional, the reasons he gave for them were generally quite conventional and continuous with the justifications offered by his predecessors for their pardons and commutations.</description><subject>Arpaio, Joe</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Clemency</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Pardons</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>rehabilitation</subject><subject>retribution</subject><subject>rhetoric</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J</subject><issn>2719-5864</issn><issn>2049-4092</issn><issn>2719-5864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqlkL1PwzAQxS0EElXpzBqJgYXQ88V2YiSGKuW7Eks7W67joFRpUuwE1P-ehCDRhYnpPvR-p3ePkHMK18jiZLre6NKHCIghAPAjMsKYypAngh0f9Kdk4n2xBoaUcwZsRF7mdaXLLFi6dru79EFa2q2tTGH9TbCqTF192Kopek0wM42_CtLD1XPrmyIvjO5nf0ZO8s6GnfzUMVnd3y3Tx3Dx-vCUzhahiWJsQk1RxAAUuMQ44ZJGwogsBw2YSCM5slwgSKoZ01rqxAjUgoMRFjJqmYnG5GK4u3P1e2t9ozZ16zo_XkXdX8BEBLxTTQeVcbX3zuZq54qtdntFQfWhqe_QVB-a6kPriNuB-NRlY11m31y775rf83-QlCKNo__wtOe_ACIkh10</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Sarat, Austin</creator><creator>Gottesfeld, Laura</creator><creator>Kettles, Carolina</creator><creator>Ward, Olivia</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Donald Trump's Clemencies: Unconventional Acts, Conventional Justifications</title><author>Sarat, Austin ; Gottesfeld, Laura ; Kettles, Carolina ; Ward, Olivia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a126700105927859136c6df0a0289c9524f62091a44aa9a8c62a650c6e0d1e4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arpaio, Joe</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Clemency</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Pardons</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>rehabilitation</topic><topic>retribution</topic><topic>rhetoric</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottesfeld, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettles, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Olivia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>British Journal of American Legal Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarat, Austin</au><au>Gottesfeld, Laura</au><au>Kettles, Carolina</au><au>Ward, Olivia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donald Trump's Clemencies: Unconventional Acts, Conventional Justifications</atitle><jtitle>British Journal of American Legal Studies</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>173-207</pages><issn>2719-5864</issn><issn>2049-4092</issn><eissn>2719-5864</eissn><abstract>During his four years as President Donald Trump's use of the clemency power generated considerable controversy. Much scholarship documents the fact that he ignored the traditional procedures for reviewing and approving requests for pardons and commutations. Trump used clemency to favor a rogues gallery of cronies, celebrities and those whose crimes showed particular contempt for the law. However, few scholars have examined the justifications he offered when he granted pardons and commutations. This paper fills that gap. We argue that because the clemency power sits uneasily with democracy and the rule of law, when Presidents use this power they feel the need to supply justifications. We report on a study of Trump's clemency justifications that suggests that while his clemencies themselves were often controversial and his means of communicating about them unconventional, the reasons he gave for them were generally quite conventional and continuous with the justifications offered by his predecessors for their pardons and commutations.</abstract><cop>Birmingham</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/bjals-2022-0005</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2719-5864 |
ispartof | British Journal of American Legal Studies, 2022-11, Vol.11 (1), p.173-207 |
issn | 2719-5864 2049-4092 2719-5864 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3155046305 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); EZB Electronic Journals Library; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Arpaio, Joe Attorneys Clemency Immigration Pardons Political activism Political campaigns Presidents rehabilitation retribution rhetoric Scandals Trump, Donald J |
title | Donald Trump's Clemencies: Unconventional Acts, Conventional Justifications |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T18%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donald%20Trump's%20Clemencies:%20Unconventional%20Acts,%20Conventional%20Justifications&rft.jtitle=British%20Journal%20of%20American%20Legal%20Studies&rft.au=Sarat,%20Austin&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=173-207&rft.issn=2719-5864&rft.eissn=2719-5864&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/bjals-2022-0005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155046305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a126700105927859136c6df0a0289c9524f62091a44aa9a8c62a650c6e0d1e4c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155046305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |