Loading…
Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces
Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (...
Saved in:
Published in: | Creativity : theories - research - applications 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.4-19 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783 |
container_end_page | 19 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 4 |
container_title | Creativity : theories - research - applications |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Phonethibsavads, Anthony Bender, Sophia Peppler, Kylie |
description | Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p < .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/ctra-2019-0001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3155926389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3155926389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLAzEURoMoWGq3rgOupyaTxzTLUh8VCi5a1yHJZNqUeZlklPrrzVBBF67utzjfvZcDwC1Gc8wwuzfRqyxHWGQIIXwBJjlhNGXCL__kazAL4TgSHGNKFhOwfYuudl-u3cN4sHDVtcG2YVA1XIZgQ2hsG-HOmkPr3gcLY5eQplc-od6q6D5cPEHXwgevGgW3vTI23ICrStXBzn7mFOyeHnerdbZ5fX5ZLTeZyUlOM8YKLqgwWhPKKWcclYQZpSmr8lJbbUpUlAU3glBCBOMl1qUmFamqokLFgkzB3Xlt77v0W4jy2A2-TRclwYyJnJOFSNT8TBnfheBtJXvvGuVPEiM5qpOjOjmqk6OYVBDnwqeqo_Wl3fvhlMLv9v-LPAn9BtnbdMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155926389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Phonethibsavads, Anthony ; Bender, Sophia ; Peppler, Kylie</creator><creatorcontrib>Phonethibsavads, Anthony ; Bender, Sophia ; Peppler, Kylie</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p < .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2354-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2354-0036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2019-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bialystok: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Consensual assessment ; Creativity ; Drama ; Education</subject><ispartof>Creativity : theories - research - applications, 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.4-19</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3155926389?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peppler, Kylie</creatorcontrib><title>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</title><title>Creativity : theories - research - applications</title><description>Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p < .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.</description><subject>Consensual assessment</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Drama</subject><subject>Education</subject><issn>2354-0036</issn><issn>2354-0036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLAzEURoMoWGq3rgOupyaTxzTLUh8VCi5a1yHJZNqUeZlklPrrzVBBF67utzjfvZcDwC1Gc8wwuzfRqyxHWGQIIXwBJjlhNGXCL__kazAL4TgSHGNKFhOwfYuudl-u3cN4sHDVtcG2YVA1XIZgQ2hsG-HOmkPr3gcLY5eQplc-od6q6D5cPEHXwgevGgW3vTI23ICrStXBzn7mFOyeHnerdbZ5fX5ZLTeZyUlOM8YKLqgwWhPKKWcclYQZpSmr8lJbbUpUlAU3glBCBOMl1qUmFamqokLFgkzB3Xlt77v0W4jy2A2-TRclwYyJnJOFSNT8TBnfheBtJXvvGuVPEiM5qpOjOjmqk6OYVBDnwqeqo_Wl3fvhlMLv9v-LPAn9BtnbdMg</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</creator><creator>Bender, Sophia</creator><creator>Peppler, Kylie</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</title><author>Phonethibsavads, Anthony ; Bender, Sophia ; Peppler, Kylie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Consensual assessment</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Drama</topic><topic>Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peppler, Kylie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Creativity : theories - research - applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</au><au>Bender, Sophia</au><au>Peppler, Kylie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</atitle><jtitle>Creativity : theories - research - applications</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>4-19</pages><issn>2354-0036</issn><eissn>2354-0036</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p < .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.</abstract><cop>Bialystok</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.1515/ctra-2019-0001</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2354-0036 |
ispartof | Creativity : theories - research - applications, 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.4-19 |
issn | 2354-0036 2354-0036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3155926389 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Consensual assessment Creativity Drama Education |
title | Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T13%3A41%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilizing%20the%20Consensual%20Assessment%20Technique%20to%20Compare%20Creativity%20in%20Drama%20Spaces&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20:%20theories%20-%20research%20-%20applications&rft.au=Phonethibsavads,%20Anthony&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=4-19&rft.issn=2354-0036&rft.eissn=2354-0036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ctra-2019-0001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155926389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155926389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |