Loading…

Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces

Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Creativity : theories - research - applications 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.4-19
Main Authors: Phonethibsavads, Anthony, Bender, Sophia, Peppler, Kylie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783
container_end_page 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4
container_title Creativity : theories - research - applications
container_volume 6
creator Phonethibsavads, Anthony
Bender, Sophia
Peppler, Kylie
description Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p < .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ctra-2019-0001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3155926389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3155926389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLAzEURoMoWGq3rgOupyaTxzTLUh8VCi5a1yHJZNqUeZlklPrrzVBBF67utzjfvZcDwC1Gc8wwuzfRqyxHWGQIIXwBJjlhNGXCL__kazAL4TgSHGNKFhOwfYuudl-u3cN4sHDVtcG2YVA1XIZgQ2hsG-HOmkPr3gcLY5eQplc-od6q6D5cPEHXwgevGgW3vTI23ICrStXBzn7mFOyeHnerdbZ5fX5ZLTeZyUlOM8YKLqgwWhPKKWcclYQZpSmr8lJbbUpUlAU3glBCBOMl1qUmFamqokLFgkzB3Xlt77v0W4jy2A2-TRclwYyJnJOFSNT8TBnfheBtJXvvGuVPEiM5qpOjOjmqk6OYVBDnwqeqo_Wl3fvhlMLv9v-LPAn9BtnbdMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3155926389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Phonethibsavads, Anthony ; Bender, Sophia ; Peppler, Kylie</creator><creatorcontrib>Phonethibsavads, Anthony ; Bender, Sophia ; Peppler, Kylie</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p &lt; .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2354-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2354-0036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2019-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bialystok: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Consensual assessment ; Creativity ; Drama ; Education</subject><ispartof>Creativity : theories - research - applications, 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.4-19</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3155926389?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peppler, Kylie</creatorcontrib><title>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</title><title>Creativity : theories - research - applications</title><description>Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p &lt; .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.</description><subject>Consensual assessment</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Drama</subject><subject>Education</subject><issn>2354-0036</issn><issn>2354-0036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLAzEURoMoWGq3rgOupyaTxzTLUh8VCi5a1yHJZNqUeZlklPrrzVBBF67utzjfvZcDwC1Gc8wwuzfRqyxHWGQIIXwBJjlhNGXCL__kazAL4TgSHGNKFhOwfYuudl-u3cN4sHDVtcG2YVA1XIZgQ2hsG-HOmkPr3gcLY5eQplc-od6q6D5cPEHXwgevGgW3vTI23ICrStXBzn7mFOyeHnerdbZ5fX5ZLTeZyUlOM8YKLqgwWhPKKWcclYQZpSmr8lJbbUpUlAU3glBCBOMl1qUmFamqokLFgkzB3Xlt77v0W4jy2A2-TRclwYyJnJOFSNT8TBnfheBtJXvvGuVPEiM5qpOjOjmqk6OYVBDnwqeqo_Wl3fvhlMLv9v-LPAn9BtnbdMg</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</creator><creator>Bender, Sophia</creator><creator>Peppler, Kylie</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</title><author>Phonethibsavads, Anthony ; Bender, Sophia ; Peppler, Kylie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Consensual assessment</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Drama</topic><topic>Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peppler, Kylie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Creativity : theories - research - applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phonethibsavads, Anthony</au><au>Bender, Sophia</au><au>Peppler, Kylie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces</atitle><jtitle>Creativity : theories - research - applications</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>4-19</pages><issn>2354-0036</issn><eissn>2354-0036</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study examines the validity of Amabile’s (1982) consensual assessment technique in measuring creativity in a warm-up activity in fourth-grade drama classrooms and compares the scores between warm-ups occurring in a blackbox theater setting (experimental) vs. a traditional classroom (control). Method: Four professional actors viewed 60 clips of children’s drama warm-ups and scored for creativity, using a 5-point scale. After establishing sufficient inter-rater reliability (IRR), we used the average scores of the raters to compare creativity between the experimental and control groups. Results: The raters demonstrated high agreement, with a coefficient alpha estimate of .819. An independent samples t-test between the experimental and control groups was significant at p &lt; .001, with the experimental group receiving higher scores. Conclusions: The results suggested that creativity was significantly higher in the experimental group, and the context correlated with creativity, despite neither group having yet received drama instruction at that time. This paper presents discussions about validity, opinions of the raters, possible implications for the activity itself, and possible effect of setting on creativity.</abstract><cop>Bialystok</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.1515/ctra-2019-0001</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2354-0036
ispartof Creativity : theories - research - applications, 2019-06, Vol.6 (1), p.4-19
issn 2354-0036
2354-0036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3155926389
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Consensual assessment
Creativity
Drama
Education
title Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T13%3A41%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilizing%20the%20Consensual%20Assessment%20Technique%20to%20Compare%20Creativity%20in%20Drama%20Spaces&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20:%20theories%20-%20research%20-%20applications&rft.au=Phonethibsavads,%20Anthony&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=4-19&rft.issn=2354-0036&rft.eissn=2354-0036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ctra-2019-0001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3155926389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2324-5576949cbb34646560d35cab45f2dbebcd07d76c93433956d1bdb3f3ff7f0783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3155926389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true