Loading…
Alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods for adaptive management studies of invasive plants
Adaptive management studies of invasive plants on non-agricultural lands typically employ an empirical approach based on designed field experiments that permit rigorous statistical analysis of results to quantify outcomes and assess the efficacy of management practices. When habitat restoration is t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Invasive plant science and management 2024-09, Vol.17 (3), p.157-171 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-ec769f7c94f69007707e9e16f59eab1a7b10d35b97342f3389d5036f4c2d3ae73 |
container_end_page | 171 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Invasive plant science and management |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | McNair, James N. Frobish, Daniel Rice, Emma K. Thum, Ryan A. |
description | Adaptive management studies of invasive plants on non-agricultural lands typically employ an empirical approach based on designed field experiments that permit rigorous statistical analysis of results to quantify outcomes and assess the efficacy of management practices. When habitat restoration is the primary goal of a project, traditional plot-based study designs (e.g., the randomized complete-block design) are sometimes infeasible (this is often true in aquatic habitats) or inappropriate (e.g., when the goal is to assess effects of management practices on survival or resprouting of individual plants, such as trees or shrubs). Moreover, the assumptions of distribution-specific parametric statistical methods such as ANOVA often cannot be convincingly verified or are clearly untenable when properly assessed. For these reasons, it is worthwhile to be aware of alternative study designs that do not employ plots as experimental units and nonparametric statistical methods that require only weak distributional assumptions. The purpose of this paper is to review several of these alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods that we have found useful in our own studies of invasive aquatic and terrestrial plants. We motivate each statistical method by a research question it is well suited to answer, provide corresponding references to the statistical literature, and identify at least one R function that implements the method. In the Supplementary Material, we present additional technical information about the statistical methods, numerical examples with data, and a set of complete R programs to illustrate application of the statistical methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/inp.2024.17 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3157121467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_inp_2024_17</cupid><sourcerecordid>3157121467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-ec769f7c94f69007707e9e16f59eab1a7b10d35b97342f3389d5036f4c2d3ae73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DAo2zNxzYxx1L8goIXBW9hdpPUlN3smqQF_727bcWLpxnmfXhgXoSuKZlRQuWdD_2MEVbOqDxBE6q4KmQpP05_d6boObpIaUOIIEKoCYqLJtsYIPudxSlvzTc2Nvl1SBiCwaELPURobY6-HvKBS9nX0ODh9NmZhF0XMRjo94IWAqxta0Peu7xNuHPYhx2kMe4bCDldojMHTbJXxzlF748Pb8vnYvX69LJcrIqasTIXtpZCOVmr0glFiJREWmWpcHNloaIgK0oMn1dK8pI5zu-VmRMuXFkzw8FKPkU3B28fu6-tTVlvuu3wapM0p3NJGS3FSN0eqDp2KUXrdB99C_FbU6LHUvVQqh5L1XSkiyMNbRW9Wds_6X_8DxHUe-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3157121467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods for adaptive management studies of invasive plants</title><source>Cambridge University Press journals</source><creator>McNair, James N. ; Frobish, Daniel ; Rice, Emma K. ; Thum, Ryan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNair, James N. ; Frobish, Daniel ; Rice, Emma K. ; Thum, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive management studies of invasive plants on non-agricultural lands typically employ an empirical approach based on designed field experiments that permit rigorous statistical analysis of results to quantify outcomes and assess the efficacy of management practices. When habitat restoration is the primary goal of a project, traditional plot-based study designs (e.g., the randomized complete-block design) are sometimes infeasible (this is often true in aquatic habitats) or inappropriate (e.g., when the goal is to assess effects of management practices on survival or resprouting of individual plants, such as trees or shrubs). Moreover, the assumptions of distribution-specific parametric statistical methods such as ANOVA often cannot be convincingly verified or are clearly untenable when properly assessed. For these reasons, it is worthwhile to be aware of alternative study designs that do not employ plots as experimental units and nonparametric statistical methods that require only weak distributional assumptions. The purpose of this paper is to review several of these alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods that we have found useful in our own studies of invasive aquatic and terrestrial plants. We motivate each statistical method by a research question it is well suited to answer, provide corresponding references to the statistical literature, and identify at least one R function that implements the method. In the Supplementary Material, we present additional technical information about the statistical methods, numerical examples with data, and a set of complete R programs to illustrate application of the statistical methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-7291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-747X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/inp.2024.17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptive management ; Agricultural land ; Aquatic habitats ; Aquatic plants ; Environmental restoration ; Field tests ; Habitats ; Herbicides ; Invasive plants ; Management methods ; Nonparametric statistics ; Project management ; Review ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Statistics ; Technical information ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Invasive plant science and management, 2024-09, Vol.17 (3), p.157-171</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-ec769f7c94f69007707e9e16f59eab1a7b10d35b97342f3389d5036f4c2d3ae73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7828-255X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1939729124000178/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72931</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNair, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frobish, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Emma K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thum, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods for adaptive management studies of invasive plants</title><title>Invasive plant science and management</title><addtitle>Invasive plant sci. manag</addtitle><description>Adaptive management studies of invasive plants on non-agricultural lands typically employ an empirical approach based on designed field experiments that permit rigorous statistical analysis of results to quantify outcomes and assess the efficacy of management practices. When habitat restoration is the primary goal of a project, traditional plot-based study designs (e.g., the randomized complete-block design) are sometimes infeasible (this is often true in aquatic habitats) or inappropriate (e.g., when the goal is to assess effects of management practices on survival or resprouting of individual plants, such as trees or shrubs). Moreover, the assumptions of distribution-specific parametric statistical methods such as ANOVA often cannot be convincingly verified or are clearly untenable when properly assessed. For these reasons, it is worthwhile to be aware of alternative study designs that do not employ plots as experimental units and nonparametric statistical methods that require only weak distributional assumptions. The purpose of this paper is to review several of these alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods that we have found useful in our own studies of invasive aquatic and terrestrial plants. We motivate each statistical method by a research question it is well suited to answer, provide corresponding references to the statistical literature, and identify at least one R function that implements the method. In the Supplementary Material, we present additional technical information about the statistical methods, numerical examples with data, and a set of complete R programs to illustrate application of the statistical methods.</description><subject>Adaptive management</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Management methods</subject><subject>Nonparametric statistics</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Technical information</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1939-7291</issn><issn>1939-747X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DAo2zNxzYxx1L8goIXBW9hdpPUlN3smqQF_727bcWLpxnmfXhgXoSuKZlRQuWdD_2MEVbOqDxBE6q4KmQpP05_d6boObpIaUOIIEKoCYqLJtsYIPudxSlvzTc2Nvl1SBiCwaELPURobY6-HvKBS9nX0ODh9NmZhF0XMRjo94IWAqxta0Peu7xNuHPYhx2kMe4bCDldojMHTbJXxzlF748Pb8vnYvX69LJcrIqasTIXtpZCOVmr0glFiJREWmWpcHNloaIgK0oMn1dK8pI5zu-VmRMuXFkzw8FKPkU3B28fu6-tTVlvuu3wapM0p3NJGS3FSN0eqDp2KUXrdB99C_FbU6LHUvVQqh5L1XSkiyMNbRW9Wds_6X_8DxHUe-Y</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>McNair, James N.</creator><creator>Frobish, Daniel</creator><creator>Rice, Emma K.</creator><creator>Thum, Ryan A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-255X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods for adaptive management studies of invasive plants</title><author>McNair, James N. ; Frobish, Daniel ; Rice, Emma K. ; Thum, Ryan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-ec769f7c94f69007707e9e16f59eab1a7b10d35b97342f3389d5036f4c2d3ae73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adaptive management</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Management methods</topic><topic>Nonparametric statistics</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Technical information</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNair, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frobish, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Emma K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thum, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Invasive plant science and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNair, James N.</au><au>Frobish, Daniel</au><au>Rice, Emma K.</au><au>Thum, Ryan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods for adaptive management studies of invasive plants</atitle><jtitle>Invasive plant science and management</jtitle><addtitle>Invasive plant sci. manag</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>157-171</pages><issn>1939-7291</issn><eissn>1939-747X</eissn><abstract>Adaptive management studies of invasive plants on non-agricultural lands typically employ an empirical approach based on designed field experiments that permit rigorous statistical analysis of results to quantify outcomes and assess the efficacy of management practices. When habitat restoration is the primary goal of a project, traditional plot-based study designs (e.g., the randomized complete-block design) are sometimes infeasible (this is often true in aquatic habitats) or inappropriate (e.g., when the goal is to assess effects of management practices on survival or resprouting of individual plants, such as trees or shrubs). Moreover, the assumptions of distribution-specific parametric statistical methods such as ANOVA often cannot be convincingly verified or are clearly untenable when properly assessed. For these reasons, it is worthwhile to be aware of alternative study designs that do not employ plots as experimental units and nonparametric statistical methods that require only weak distributional assumptions. The purpose of this paper is to review several of these alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods that we have found useful in our own studies of invasive aquatic and terrestrial plants. We motivate each statistical method by a research question it is well suited to answer, provide corresponding references to the statistical literature, and identify at least one R function that implements the method. In the Supplementary Material, we present additional technical information about the statistical methods, numerical examples with data, and a set of complete R programs to illustrate application of the statistical methods.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/inp.2024.17</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-255X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1939-7291 |
ispartof | Invasive plant science and management, 2024-09, Vol.17 (3), p.157-171 |
issn | 1939-7291 1939-747X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3157121467 |
source | Cambridge University Press journals |
subjects | Adaptive management Agricultural land Aquatic habitats Aquatic plants Environmental restoration Field tests Habitats Herbicides Invasive plants Management methods Nonparametric statistics Project management Review Statistical analysis Statistical methods Statistics Technical information Variance analysis |
title | Alternative study designs and nonparametric statistical methods for adaptive management studies of invasive plants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T16%3A11%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20study%20designs%20and%20nonparametric%20statistical%20methods%20for%20adaptive%20management%20studies%20of%20invasive%20plants&rft.jtitle=Invasive%20plant%20science%20and%20management&rft.au=McNair,%20James%20N.&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=157-171&rft.issn=1939-7291&rft.eissn=1939-747X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/inp.2024.17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3157121467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-ec769f7c94f69007707e9e16f59eab1a7b10d35b97342f3389d5036f4c2d3ae73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3157121467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_inp_2024_17&rfr_iscdi=true |