Loading…

There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached

Through a review of the literature, the present article outlines the interaction forms that happen on Twitter when the participation is political, intending to show that the conversations made by the most significant collective on Twitter which is formed by ordinary users that post tweets 24/7 any g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistic Frontiers 2022-09, Vol.5 (2), p.25-40
Main Author: González-List, Verónica
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-dcb19df485cd493ec0286ac7db02a561276106c3014723f0d1a414fdc6099fc63
container_end_page 40
container_issue 2
container_start_page 25
container_title Linguistic Frontiers
container_volume 5
creator González-List, Verónica
description Through a review of the literature, the present article outlines the interaction forms that happen on Twitter when the participation is political, intending to show that the conversations made by the most significant collective on Twitter which is formed by ordinary users that post tweets 24/7 any given day with the sole intention to make public its political views, are invisible for the social studies. The actual political conversations attended by the social studies are related to parties, civic organizations, street manifestation, social activism, or some political manifestation that requires organization. The subject is important because these ordinary users with no agendas related to the formal or informal forms of political conversations known by the social studies form the biggest sector in the political social network par excellence, and no one is studying them. We propose the adjective ‘detached’ users to refer to these Twitter users.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/lf-2022-0014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3157333982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3157333982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-dcb19df485cd493ec0286ac7db02a561276106c3014723f0d1a414fdc6099fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNTe_AELXo3OfibxJkWrUPBSz8t2P5qU2I27GyT_3oR68DQD8_AO74PQLYEHysvqsfMFBUoLAMIv0IIKzgvJWH35b79Gq5SOAMAYJaKqF2i7a1x0uE1Y40MMQ4-Dx33o2twa3eH841x2MeHc6IxPYR_sOMMpD3ZsT4en6eCwdVmbxtkbdOV1l9zqby7R5-vLbv1WbD827-vnbWGIoKKwZk9q63kljOU1cwZoJbUp7R6oFpLQUhKQhk1FSso8WKI54d4aCXXtjWRLdHfO7WP4HlzK6hiGeJpeKkZEyaamFZ2o-zNlYkgpOq_62H7pOCoCalamOq9mZWpWxn4Bsq9dEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3157333982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>González-List, Verónica</creator><creatorcontrib>González-List, Verónica</creatorcontrib><description>Through a review of the literature, the present article outlines the interaction forms that happen on Twitter when the participation is political, intending to show that the conversations made by the most significant collective on Twitter which is formed by ordinary users that post tweets 24/7 any given day with the sole intention to make public its political views, are invisible for the social studies. The actual political conversations attended by the social studies are related to parties, civic organizations, street manifestation, social activism, or some political manifestation that requires organization. The subject is important because these ordinary users with no agendas related to the formal or informal forms of political conversations known by the social studies form the biggest sector in the political social network par excellence, and no one is studying them. We propose the adjective ‘detached’ users to refer to these Twitter users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2544-6339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2544-6339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/lf-2022-0014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Olomouc: De Gruyter Poland</publisher><ispartof>Linguistic Frontiers, 2022-09, Vol.5 (2), p.25-40</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-dcb19df485cd493ec0286ac7db02a561276106c3014723f0d1a414fdc6099fc63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8029-6344</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3157333982?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>González-List, Verónica</creatorcontrib><title>There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached</title><title>Linguistic Frontiers</title><description>Through a review of the literature, the present article outlines the interaction forms that happen on Twitter when the participation is political, intending to show that the conversations made by the most significant collective on Twitter which is formed by ordinary users that post tweets 24/7 any given day with the sole intention to make public its political views, are invisible for the social studies. The actual political conversations attended by the social studies are related to parties, civic organizations, street manifestation, social activism, or some political manifestation that requires organization. The subject is important because these ordinary users with no agendas related to the formal or informal forms of political conversations known by the social studies form the biggest sector in the political social network par excellence, and no one is studying them. We propose the adjective ‘detached’ users to refer to these Twitter users.</description><issn>2544-6339</issn><issn>2544-6339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNTe_AELXo3OfibxJkWrUPBSz8t2P5qU2I27GyT_3oR68DQD8_AO74PQLYEHysvqsfMFBUoLAMIv0IIKzgvJWH35b79Gq5SOAMAYJaKqF2i7a1x0uE1Y40MMQ4-Dx33o2twa3eH841x2MeHc6IxPYR_sOMMpD3ZsT4en6eCwdVmbxtkbdOV1l9zqby7R5-vLbv1WbD827-vnbWGIoKKwZk9q63kljOU1cwZoJbUp7R6oFpLQUhKQhk1FSso8WKI54d4aCXXtjWRLdHfO7WP4HlzK6hiGeJpeKkZEyaamFZ2o-zNlYkgpOq_62H7pOCoCalamOq9mZWpWxn4Bsq9dEA</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>González-List, Verónica</creator><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-6344</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached</title><author>González-List, Verónica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-dcb19df485cd493ec0286ac7db02a561276106c3014723f0d1a414fdc6099fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González-List, Verónica</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Linguistic Frontiers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González-List, Verónica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached</atitle><jtitle>Linguistic Frontiers</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>25-40</pages><issn>2544-6339</issn><eissn>2544-6339</eissn><abstract>Through a review of the literature, the present article outlines the interaction forms that happen on Twitter when the participation is political, intending to show that the conversations made by the most significant collective on Twitter which is formed by ordinary users that post tweets 24/7 any given day with the sole intention to make public its political views, are invisible for the social studies. The actual political conversations attended by the social studies are related to parties, civic organizations, street manifestation, social activism, or some political manifestation that requires organization. The subject is important because these ordinary users with no agendas related to the formal or informal forms of political conversations known by the social studies form the biggest sector in the political social network par excellence, and no one is studying them. We propose the adjective ‘detached’ users to refer to these Twitter users.</abstract><cop>Olomouc</cop><pub>De Gruyter Poland</pub><doi>10.2478/lf-2022-0014</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-6344</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2544-6339
ispartof Linguistic Frontiers, 2022-09, Vol.5 (2), p.25-40
issn 2544-6339
2544-6339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3157333982
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
title There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A15%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=There%20is%20a%20group%20of%20political%20tweeters%20that%20nobody%20is%20studying:%20the%20detached&rft.jtitle=Linguistic%20Frontiers&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez-List,%20Ver%C3%B3nica&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=25-40&rft.issn=2544-6339&rft.eissn=2544-6339&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/lf-2022-0014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3157333982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-dcb19df485cd493ec0286ac7db02a561276106c3014723f0d1a414fdc6099fc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3157333982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true