Loading…

Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L

The Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric (distribution-free) rank statistic proposed by Charles Spearman as a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. It is a measure of a monotonic relationship that is used when the distribution of the data makes Pears...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biometrical letters 2024-12, Vol.61 (2), p.115-135
Main Authors: Bocianowski, Jan, Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota, Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna, Matusiak, Karolina, Wiatrowska, Blanka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1605-43df3a9a4a35e81e3127dee6b9f9cdcb61c557c9ca5b23669719a5931174d9d63
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115
container_title Biometrical letters
container_volume 61
creator Bocianowski, Jan
Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota
Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna
Matusiak, Karolina
Wiatrowska, Blanka
description The Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric (distribution-free) rank statistic proposed by Charles Spearman as a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. It is a measure of a monotonic relationship that is used when the distribution of the data makes Pearson’s correlation coefficient undesirable or misleading. The Spearman coefficient is not a measure of the linear relationship between two variables. It assesses how well an arbitrary monotonic function can describe the relationship between two variables, without making any assumptions about the frequency distribution of the variables. Unlike Pearson’s product-moment (linear) correlation coefficient, it does not require the assumption that the relationship between variables is linear, nor does it require that the variables be measured on interval scales; it can be applied to variables measured at the ordinal level. The purpose of this study is to compare the values of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and their statistical significance for six morpho-anatomical traits of L. (original – for Pearson’s coefficient, and ranked – for Spearman’s coefficient) estimated from all observations, object means (for trees), and medians. The results show that the linear and rank correlation coefficients are consistent (as to direction and strength). In cases of divergence in the direction of correlation, the correlation coefficients were not statistically significant, which does not imply consistency in decision-making. Estimation of correlation coefficients based on medians is robust to outlier observations and factors that linear correlation is then very similar to rank correlation.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/bile-2024-0008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3159695488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3159695488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1605-43df3a9a4a35e81e3127dee6b9f9cdcb61c557c9ca5b23669719a5931174d9d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtKxDAULaLgoLN1HXDdMWmatAE3MviCAQUV3IU0uZEObVOTVpmdv-Hv-SWmVNCFq3s4nAf3JMkJwassL8qzqm4gzXCWpxjjci9ZZESIlBXF8_4ffJgsQ9hGBWEcE1Isknbt2l75OrgOOYvuQfkIvz4-A1KdQQ99JFo1E9p5D40a6qjVDqytdQ3dEJB1HgVoQA9g0OBVHbkprO7GgMKueYMwxAq0OU4OrGoCLH_uUfJ0dfm4vkk3d9e364tNqgnHLM2psVQJlSvKoCRASVYYAF4JK7TRFSeasUILrViVUc5FQYRigsaPciMMp0fJ6Zzbe_c6xna5daPvYqWkhAkuWF6WUbWaVdq7EDxY2fu6VX4nCZbTqnJaVU6rymnVaDifDe-qGcAbePHjLoLf9P-NnGSEMPoN6WiCEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3159695488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Bocianowski, Jan ; Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota ; Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna ; Matusiak, Karolina ; Wiatrowska, Blanka</creator><creatorcontrib>Bocianowski, Jan ; Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota ; Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna ; Matusiak, Karolina ; Wiatrowska, Blanka</creatorcontrib><description>The Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric (distribution-free) rank statistic proposed by Charles Spearman as a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. It is a measure of a monotonic relationship that is used when the distribution of the data makes Pearson’s correlation coefficient undesirable or misleading. The Spearman coefficient is not a measure of the linear relationship between two variables. It assesses how well an arbitrary monotonic function can describe the relationship between two variables, without making any assumptions about the frequency distribution of the variables. Unlike Pearson’s product-moment (linear) correlation coefficient, it does not require the assumption that the relationship between variables is linear, nor does it require that the variables be measured on interval scales; it can be applied to variables measured at the ordinal level. The purpose of this study is to compare the values of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and their statistical significance for six morpho-anatomical traits of L. (original – for Pearson’s coefficient, and ranked – for Spearman’s coefficient) estimated from all observations, object means (for trees), and medians. The results show that the linear and rank correlation coefficients are consistent (as to direction and strength). In cases of divergence in the direction of correlation, the correlation coefficients were not statistically significant, which does not imply consistency in decision-making. Estimation of correlation coefficients based on medians is robust to outlier observations and factors that linear correlation is then very similar to rank correlation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-577X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1896-3811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-577X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/bile-2024-0008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poznan: Sciendo</publisher><subject>linear correlation ; median ; rank correlation ; Scots pine</subject><ispartof>Biometrical letters, 2024-12, Vol.61 (2), p.115-135</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1605-43df3a9a4a35e81e3127dee6b9f9cdcb61c557c9ca5b23669719a5931174d9d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3159695488?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bocianowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matusiak, Karolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiatrowska, Blanka</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L</title><title>Biometrical letters</title><description>The Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric (distribution-free) rank statistic proposed by Charles Spearman as a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. It is a measure of a monotonic relationship that is used when the distribution of the data makes Pearson’s correlation coefficient undesirable or misleading. The Spearman coefficient is not a measure of the linear relationship between two variables. It assesses how well an arbitrary monotonic function can describe the relationship between two variables, without making any assumptions about the frequency distribution of the variables. Unlike Pearson’s product-moment (linear) correlation coefficient, it does not require the assumption that the relationship between variables is linear, nor does it require that the variables be measured on interval scales; it can be applied to variables measured at the ordinal level. The purpose of this study is to compare the values of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and their statistical significance for six morpho-anatomical traits of L. (original – for Pearson’s coefficient, and ranked – for Spearman’s coefficient) estimated from all observations, object means (for trees), and medians. The results show that the linear and rank correlation coefficients are consistent (as to direction and strength). In cases of divergence in the direction of correlation, the correlation coefficients were not statistically significant, which does not imply consistency in decision-making. Estimation of correlation coefficients based on medians is robust to outlier observations and factors that linear correlation is then very similar to rank correlation.</description><subject>linear correlation</subject><subject>median</subject><subject>rank correlation</subject><subject>Scots pine</subject><issn>2199-577X</issn><issn>1896-3811</issn><issn>2199-577X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptUMtKxDAULaLgoLN1HXDdMWmatAE3MviCAQUV3IU0uZEObVOTVpmdv-Hv-SWmVNCFq3s4nAf3JMkJwassL8qzqm4gzXCWpxjjci9ZZESIlBXF8_4ffJgsQ9hGBWEcE1Isknbt2l75OrgOOYvuQfkIvz4-A1KdQQ99JFo1E9p5D40a6qjVDqytdQ3dEJB1HgVoQA9g0OBVHbkprO7GgMKueYMwxAq0OU4OrGoCLH_uUfJ0dfm4vkk3d9e364tNqgnHLM2psVQJlSvKoCRASVYYAF4JK7TRFSeasUILrViVUc5FQYRigsaPciMMp0fJ6Zzbe_c6xna5daPvYqWkhAkuWF6WUbWaVdq7EDxY2fu6VX4nCZbTqnJaVU6rymnVaDifDe-qGcAbePHjLoLf9P-NnGSEMPoN6WiCEw</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Bocianowski, Jan</creator><creator>Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota</creator><creator>Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna</creator><creator>Matusiak, Karolina</creator><creator>Wiatrowska, Blanka</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L</title><author>Bocianowski, Jan ; Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota ; Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna ; Matusiak, Karolina ; Wiatrowska, Blanka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1605-43df3a9a4a35e81e3127dee6b9f9cdcb61c557c9ca5b23669719a5931174d9d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>linear correlation</topic><topic>median</topic><topic>rank correlation</topic><topic>Scots pine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bocianowski, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matusiak, Karolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiatrowska, Blanka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Biometrical letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bocianowski, Jan</au><au>Wrońska-Pilarek, Dorota</au><au>Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Anna</au><au>Matusiak, Karolina</au><au>Wiatrowska, Blanka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L</atitle><jtitle>Biometrical letters</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>115-135</pages><issn>2199-577X</issn><issn>1896-3811</issn><eissn>2199-577X</eissn><abstract>The Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a non-parametric (distribution-free) rank statistic proposed by Charles Spearman as a measure of the strength of the relationship between two variables. It is a measure of a monotonic relationship that is used when the distribution of the data makes Pearson’s correlation coefficient undesirable or misleading. The Spearman coefficient is not a measure of the linear relationship between two variables. It assesses how well an arbitrary monotonic function can describe the relationship between two variables, without making any assumptions about the frequency distribution of the variables. Unlike Pearson’s product-moment (linear) correlation coefficient, it does not require the assumption that the relationship between variables is linear, nor does it require that the variables be measured on interval scales; it can be applied to variables measured at the ordinal level. The purpose of this study is to compare the values of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and their statistical significance for six morpho-anatomical traits of L. (original – for Pearson’s coefficient, and ranked – for Spearman’s coefficient) estimated from all observations, object means (for trees), and medians. The results show that the linear and rank correlation coefficients are consistent (as to direction and strength). In cases of divergence in the direction of correlation, the correlation coefficients were not statistically significant, which does not imply consistency in decision-making. Estimation of correlation coefficients based on medians is robust to outlier observations and factors that linear correlation is then very similar to rank correlation.</abstract><cop>Poznan</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/bile-2024-0008</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-577X
ispartof Biometrical letters, 2024-12, Vol.61 (2), p.115-135
issn 2199-577X
1896-3811
2199-577X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3159695488
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects linear correlation
median
rank correlation
Scots pine
title Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A58%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Pearson%E2%80%99s%20and%20Spearman%E2%80%99s%20correlation%20coefficients%20for%20selected%20traits%20of%20Pinus%20sylvestris%20L&rft.jtitle=Biometrical%20letters&rft.au=Bocianowski,%20Jan&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=115-135&rft.issn=2199-577X&rft.eissn=2199-577X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/bile-2024-0008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3159695488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1605-43df3a9a4a35e81e3127dee6b9f9cdcb61c557c9ca5b23669719a5931174d9d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3159695488&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true