Exposure to climate shocks, poverty and household well-being

We evaluate the impact of climate shocks on the well-being of farmer households in a Small Island Developing State in the Pacific, the Solomon Islands. We find that both subjective (self-assessed exposure to climate shocks) and objective (number of past dry spells) indicators of environmental stress...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environment and development economics 2024-10, Vol.29 (5), p.426-455
Main Authors: Becchetti, Leonardo, Mancini, Sara, Savastano, Sara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assets
Climate
Climate adaptation
Climate change
Climate policy
Consumption
Damage prevention
Developing countries
Environmental indicators
Environmental stress
Farmers
Global climate
Households
Hypotheses
Islands
LDCs
Low income groups
Nutritional status
Poverty
Quality of life
Shelters
Shock resistance
Well being
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluate the impact of climate shocks on the well-being of farmer households in a Small Island Developing State in the Pacific, the Solomon Islands. We find that both subjective (self-assessed exposure to climate shocks) and objective (number of past dry spells) indicators of environmental stress significantly reduce the quality of life among households. Household well-being is more severely affected for farmers living in poor dwellings (e.g., those with thatched roofs signaling shelters less resistant to environmental shocks), with below median income or durable assets, living in isolated areas and not being members of agricultural associations. Furthermore, households affected by climate shocks experience a significantly higher proportion of nutritional problems. These findings support the hypothesis of a strong correlation between climate shocks, household well-being and nutritional status, advocating for the relevance of global climate adaptation policies such as loss and damage funds, as well as prevention strategies.
ISSN:1355-770X
1469-4395
DOI:10.1017/S1355770X24000160