Oral and written feedback and their relationship with using different assessment methods in higher education

This study investigates the relationship between assessment methods and the provided feedback (Oral and Written). The data have been collected from (714) undergraduate students from four public universities in Jordan using 16 rating scale items (Strongly agree to strongly disagree). Findings show th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of applied educational studies 2010-04, Vol.7 (1), p.43
Main Authors: Alquraan, Mahmoud F, Bsharah, Mwafaq S, Al-Bustanji, Murad A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic Achievement
Achievement tests
Analysis
Cognitive ability
Course Content
Education, Higher
Educational evaluation
Higher education
Independent sample
Learning
Learning Strategies
Management
Methods
Social interaction
Student Evaluation
Student Motivation
Studies
Teacher-student relationships
Teachers
Thinking Skills
Undergraduate Students
Universities
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the relationship between assessment methods and the provided feedback (Oral and Written). The data have been collected from (714) undergraduate students from four public universities in Jordan using 16 rating scale items (Strongly agree to strongly disagree). Findings show that using different assessment methods results much more oral and written feedback. That is; professors who use different assessment methods to assess their students learning outcomes provide their students with more oral and written feedback. Also, the results show that the relationship between using different assessment methods and the level of the provided oral and written feedback is the same in both humanity and scientific colleges. Based on these results, the study recommends that higher education institutes should encourage professors to use different assessment methods, and to use different types of feedback.
ISSN:1996-773X
1996-773X