Loading…
Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material
Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of intravenous 1.0-M gadobutrol injections in patients with an indication for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) of supra-aortal, pelvic, or peripheral arteries by examining and assessing adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2003-09, Vol.13 (9), p.2067-2074 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123 |
container_end_page | 2074 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2067 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Balzer, Jörn O Loewe, Christian Davis, Kirsten Goyen, Mathias Leiner, Tim Meaney, James F M Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot Tombach, Bernd Vosshenrich, Rolf Wegener, Robin |
description | Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of intravenous 1.0-M gadobutrol injections in patients with an indication for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) of supra-aortal, pelvic, or peripheral arteries by examining and assessing adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs and ECG findings for clinical significance. In 435 patients, recruited in three multicenter trials for safety evaluations of the new contrast agent 1.0-M gadobutrol, CE MRA was performed with 1.0- to 1.5-T scanners using three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences and phased-array coils. The study population comprised 312 men and 123 women with a mean age of 60.9 years. Two hundred seven patients had an indication for imaging of body arteries and 228 had an indication for imaging of peripheral arteries. Blood laboratory values and urinalysis results of 124 patients as well as heart rate, blood pressure, and 12-lead-electrocardiogram readings of 93 patients obtained during a follow-up period of up to 72 h after the injection of contrast media were available for safety analysis. Contrast media application was performed as intravenous bolus injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol in fixed doses according to the patients' body weight (b.w.) and indication for CE MRA and was followed by a 20- to 40-ml saline flush. Mean dose actually applied was 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. Flow rate ranged between 0.2 and 2.0 ml/s. Safety evaluations found a good tolerability with only 4.6% of at least "possibly related" adverse reactions and no clinically relevant changes in blood and urine samples including no transmetallation effect on serum zinc values. Analysis of renal tolerance showed no influence on renal function irrespective of preexisting renal impairment. The ECG analysis (rhythm analysis, pace-setting disturbances, conduction disturbances, and time interval measurements, including uncorrected and corrected QT) showed no clinically relevant effect of the injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol on the cardiac conduction system. Intravenous injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol at a dose of up to 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. in the indication CE MRA is safe and causes no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood and urine laboratory values, and cardiac conduction system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-002-1768-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_613725621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084598161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADcyuI_eeWUySym-oEXwsXEz3CaTtKXJxJlkkX9vSosuLpcL55zL-Qi5ZnDHAPR9BBACEgCeMJ1miTohUybFeEEmT8kUjMgSbYyckIsYtwBgmNTnZMK44ZlRekq-P7B03UB9SXPfdAFjl7hmjU3uCrp8p9hUG18FbNcDdXW788OmqWiFhV_1XfA7yu6ALinGPzutsXNhg7tLclbiLrqr456Rr6fHz_lLsnh7fp0_LJJcGN4lWPCiFFqk2Tgqc64QoNIVz1OpFGqNjpepNiClKuXYSI6FXM5EgSZDZFzMyO0htw3-p3exs1vfh2Z8aVMmNFcpZ6OIHUR58DEGV9o2bGoMg2Vg9zDtAaYdYdo9TKtGz80xuF_Vrvh3HOmJX59Rbn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>613725621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Balzer, Jörn O ; Loewe, Christian ; Davis, Kirsten ; Goyen, Mathias ; Leiner, Tim ; Meaney, James F M ; Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane ; Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot ; Tombach, Bernd ; Vosshenrich, Rolf ; Wegener, Robin</creator><creatorcontrib>Balzer, Jörn O ; Loewe, Christian ; Davis, Kirsten ; Goyen, Mathias ; Leiner, Tim ; Meaney, James F M ; Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane ; Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot ; Tombach, Bernd ; Vosshenrich, Rolf ; Wegener, Robin</creatorcontrib><description>Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of intravenous 1.0-M gadobutrol injections in patients with an indication for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) of supra-aortal, pelvic, or peripheral arteries by examining and assessing adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs and ECG findings for clinical significance. In 435 patients, recruited in three multicenter trials for safety evaluations of the new contrast agent 1.0-M gadobutrol, CE MRA was performed with 1.0- to 1.5-T scanners using three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences and phased-array coils. The study population comprised 312 men and 123 women with a mean age of 60.9 years. Two hundred seven patients had an indication for imaging of body arteries and 228 had an indication for imaging of peripheral arteries. Blood laboratory values and urinalysis results of 124 patients as well as heart rate, blood pressure, and 12-lead-electrocardiogram readings of 93 patients obtained during a follow-up period of up to 72 h after the injection of contrast media were available for safety analysis. Contrast media application was performed as intravenous bolus injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol in fixed doses according to the patients' body weight (b.w.) and indication for CE MRA and was followed by a 20- to 40-ml saline flush. Mean dose actually applied was 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. Flow rate ranged between 0.2 and 2.0 ml/s. Safety evaluations found a good tolerability with only 4.6% of at least "possibly related" adverse reactions and no clinically relevant changes in blood and urine samples including no transmetallation effect on serum zinc values. Analysis of renal tolerance showed no influence on renal function irrespective of preexisting renal impairment. The ECG analysis (rhythm analysis, pace-setting disturbances, conduction disturbances, and time interval measurements, including uncorrected and corrected QT) showed no clinically relevant effect of the injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol on the cardiac conduction system. Intravenous injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol at a dose of up to 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. in the indication CE MRA is safe and causes no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood and urine laboratory values, and cardiac conduction system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1768-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12928957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Blood pressure ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Contrast Media - adverse effects ; Creatinine - blood ; Electrocardiography - drug effects ; Female ; Heart rate ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Organometallic Compounds - adverse effects ; Vascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Veins & arteries ; Zinc - blood</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2003-09, Vol.13 (9), p.2067-2074</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12928957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balzer, Jörn O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyen, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiner, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meaney, James F M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tombach, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vosshenrich, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Robin</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of intravenous 1.0-M gadobutrol injections in patients with an indication for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) of supra-aortal, pelvic, or peripheral arteries by examining and assessing adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs and ECG findings for clinical significance. In 435 patients, recruited in three multicenter trials for safety evaluations of the new contrast agent 1.0-M gadobutrol, CE MRA was performed with 1.0- to 1.5-T scanners using three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences and phased-array coils. The study population comprised 312 men and 123 women with a mean age of 60.9 years. Two hundred seven patients had an indication for imaging of body arteries and 228 had an indication for imaging of peripheral arteries. Blood laboratory values and urinalysis results of 124 patients as well as heart rate, blood pressure, and 12-lead-electrocardiogram readings of 93 patients obtained during a follow-up period of up to 72 h after the injection of contrast media were available for safety analysis. Contrast media application was performed as intravenous bolus injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol in fixed doses according to the patients' body weight (b.w.) and indication for CE MRA and was followed by a 20- to 40-ml saline flush. Mean dose actually applied was 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. Flow rate ranged between 0.2 and 2.0 ml/s. Safety evaluations found a good tolerability with only 4.6% of at least "possibly related" adverse reactions and no clinically relevant changes in blood and urine samples including no transmetallation effect on serum zinc values. Analysis of renal tolerance showed no influence on renal function irrespective of preexisting renal impairment. The ECG analysis (rhythm analysis, pace-setting disturbances, conduction disturbances, and time interval measurements, including uncorrected and corrected QT) showed no clinically relevant effect of the injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol on the cardiac conduction system. Intravenous injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol at a dose of up to 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. in the indication CE MRA is safe and causes no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood and urine laboratory values, and cardiac conduction system.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Contrast Media - adverse effects</subject><subject>Creatinine - blood</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><subject>Zinc - blood</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADcyuI_eeWUySym-oEXwsXEz3CaTtKXJxJlkkX9vSosuLpcL55zL-Qi5ZnDHAPR9BBACEgCeMJ1miTohUybFeEEmT8kUjMgSbYyckIsYtwBgmNTnZMK44ZlRekq-P7B03UB9SXPfdAFjl7hmjU3uCrp8p9hUG18FbNcDdXW788OmqWiFhV_1XfA7yu6ALinGPzutsXNhg7tLclbiLrqr456Rr6fHz_lLsnh7fp0_LJJcGN4lWPCiFFqk2Tgqc64QoNIVz1OpFGqNjpepNiClKuXYSI6FXM5EgSZDZFzMyO0htw3-p3exs1vfh2Z8aVMmNFcpZ6OIHUR58DEGV9o2bGoMg2Vg9zDtAaYdYdo9TKtGz80xuF_Vrvh3HOmJX59Rbn0</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>Balzer, Jörn O</creator><creator>Loewe, Christian</creator><creator>Davis, Kirsten</creator><creator>Goyen, Mathias</creator><creator>Leiner, Tim</creator><creator>Meaney, James F M</creator><creator>Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane</creator><creator>Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot</creator><creator>Tombach, Bernd</creator><creator>Vosshenrich, Rolf</creator><creator>Wegener, Robin</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material</title><author>Balzer, Jörn O ; Loewe, Christian ; Davis, Kirsten ; Goyen, Mathias ; Leiner, Tim ; Meaney, James F M ; Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane ; Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot ; Tombach, Bernd ; Vosshenrich, Rolf ; Wegener, Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Contrast Media - adverse effects</topic><topic>Creatinine - blood</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><topic>Zinc - blood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balzer, Jörn O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyen, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiner, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meaney, James F M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tombach, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vosshenrich, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Proquest Health & Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balzer, Jörn O</au><au>Loewe, Christian</au><au>Davis, Kirsten</au><au>Goyen, Mathias</au><au>Leiner, Tim</au><au>Meaney, James F M</au><au>Pöckler-Schöniger, Christiane</au><au>Schulte-Altedorneburg, Gernot</au><au>Tombach, Bernd</au><au>Vosshenrich, Rolf</au><au>Wegener, Robin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2067</spage><epage>2074</epage><pages>2067-2074</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of intravenous 1.0-M gadobutrol injections in patients with an indication for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) of supra-aortal, pelvic, or peripheral arteries by examining and assessing adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs and ECG findings for clinical significance. In 435 patients, recruited in three multicenter trials for safety evaluations of the new contrast agent 1.0-M gadobutrol, CE MRA was performed with 1.0- to 1.5-T scanners using three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences and phased-array coils. The study population comprised 312 men and 123 women with a mean age of 60.9 years. Two hundred seven patients had an indication for imaging of body arteries and 228 had an indication for imaging of peripheral arteries. Blood laboratory values and urinalysis results of 124 patients as well as heart rate, blood pressure, and 12-lead-electrocardiogram readings of 93 patients obtained during a follow-up period of up to 72 h after the injection of contrast media were available for safety analysis. Contrast media application was performed as intravenous bolus injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol in fixed doses according to the patients' body weight (b.w.) and indication for CE MRA and was followed by a 20- to 40-ml saline flush. Mean dose actually applied was 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. Flow rate ranged between 0.2 and 2.0 ml/s. Safety evaluations found a good tolerability with only 4.6% of at least "possibly related" adverse reactions and no clinically relevant changes in blood and urine samples including no transmetallation effect on serum zinc values. Analysis of renal tolerance showed no influence on renal function irrespective of preexisting renal impairment. The ECG analysis (rhythm analysis, pace-setting disturbances, conduction disturbances, and time interval measurements, including uncorrected and corrected QT) showed no clinically relevant effect of the injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol on the cardiac conduction system. Intravenous injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol at a dose of up to 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. in the indication CE MRA is safe and causes no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood and urine laboratory values, and cardiac conduction system.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12928957</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-002-1768-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2003-09, Vol.13 (9), p.2067-2074 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_613725621 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Aged Blood pressure Blood Pressure - drug effects Contrast Media - adverse effects Creatinine - blood Electrocardiography - drug effects Female Heart rate Heart Rate - drug effects Humans Injections, Intravenous Magnetic Resonance Angiography Medical imaging Middle Aged Organometallic Compounds - adverse effects Vascular Diseases - diagnosis Veins & arteries Zinc - blood |
title | Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A57%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20contrast-enhanced%20MR%20angiography%20employing%20gadobutrol%201.0%20M%20as%20contrast%20material&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Balzer,%20J%C3%B6rn%20O&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2067&rft.epage=2074&rft.pages=2067-2074&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-002-1768-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2084598161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ad2df3736873658eed3056b2c6455a77ae2f6790445f40934799ec13da98aa123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=613725621&rft_id=info:pmid/12928957&rfr_iscdi=true |