Should Psychology Bake Bread?

• Published in: Journal of applied psychology 1920-12, Vol.4 (4), p.294-305
• Main Author: Frost, E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Business; Human; Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Management; Sciences
• ISSN: 0021-9010; 1939-1854
• DOI: 10.1037/h0072865

At least two considerations may militate against the wise application of a science: First, the science may be so new and its conclusions in consequence so half-baked, that the premature utilization of them is of no value, or second, we run a liability of prejudicing the future of the science itself, so that subsequent researches are no longer as search for truth but are biases and opinions dictated by needs. The second result would be calamitous. Is psychology sufficiently developed so that it may hope to offer its formulae and conclusions as practical recipes toward the solution of human problems? What is the effect of success upon the science itself and those who carry its touch? The technique of the psychology laboratory is not sufficiently standardized to translate it effectively to industry. The major premise that human problems of industry are psychological is well established and industry has recognized it. The minor premise of application is lacking and will probably remain so until more men are interested in both the psychological and industrial background. Industry inclines to be over-practical, while the laboratory psychologist leaves out of account variables due to nationality of worker, history of management, etc., which vary with each industry. Industry needs the psychologist but he must come with his overalls on and be as eager to learn as to teach. "Underdone bread is sometimes worse than no bread and makes for indigestion. If the psychologist is to do any industrial baking, he must learn first to cook, for everyone knows, cooking is an art and its secrets lie outside of books." From Psych Bulletin 18:05:00250.