Loading…
Learning curves: Facts or artifacts?
"It is our purpose in this paper to show that the arbitrary choice of a cutoff point in the dichotomizing of continuous response distributions can impose significant constraints upon the shape of resulting learning curves, and that this can form the basis of misleading theoretical interpretatio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological bulletin 1957-05, Vol.54 (3), p.256-268 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-2ce1a5bd93ca3d9a24560feecdd2f362e1d68e282ba903ccb874d8d2f2d95e853 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 268 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | Psychological bulletin |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Bahrick, Harry P Fitts, Paul M Briggs, George E |
description | "It is our purpose in this paper to show that the arbitrary choice of a cutoff point in the dichotomizing of continuous response distributions can impose significant constraints upon the shape of resulting learning curves, and that this can form the basis of misleading theoretical interpretations. We have chosen for illustration of this point the use of time-on-target scores as indicants of the level of skill attained in tracking tasks. However, we believe that the principles developed are quite general and apply to many learning situations." 18 references. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0040313 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614275433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1296844924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-2ce1a5bd93ca3d9a24560feecdd2f362e1d68e282ba903ccb874d8d2f2d95e853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKxDAQBuAgCtZV8BGK7sFLdZJJ2saLyOKqUPCi55AmqXapbU1aYd_elurR0zDMxwzzE3JO4ZoCZjcfAByQ4gGJqESZUC7EIYkAEBMmQR6TkxB2AJCJFCOyLpz2bd2-x2b03y7cxltthhB3PtZ-qKu5uTslR5Vugjv7rSvytn143Twlxcvj8-a-SDSCHBJmHNWitBKNRis14yKFyjljLaswZY7aNHcsZ6WWgMaUecZtPs2YlcLlAlfkYtnb--5rdGFQu2707XRSpZSzTHDECV3-hyiTac65ZHxSV4syvgvBu0r1vv7Ufq8oqDko9RfURNcL1b1Wfdib-XHTuKDKsVGCK1RsyuoHiThkkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614275433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning curves: Facts or artifacts?</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Bahrick, Harry P ; Fitts, Paul M ; Briggs, George E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bahrick, Harry P ; Fitts, Paul M ; Briggs, George E</creatorcontrib><description>"It is our purpose in this paper to show that the arbitrary choice of a cutoff point in the dichotomizing of continuous response distributions can impose significant constraints upon the shape of resulting learning curves, and that this can form the basis of misleading theoretical interpretations. We have chosen for illustration of this point the use of time-on-target scores as indicants of the level of skill attained in tracking tasks. However, we believe that the principles developed are quite general and apply to many learning situations." 18 references.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0040313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, etc: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Cognitive Processes ; Human ; Learning ; Theoretical Interpretation</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 1957-05, Vol.54 (3), p.256-268</ispartof><rights>1957 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1957, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-2ce1a5bd93ca3d9a24560feecdd2f362e1d68e282ba903ccb874d8d2f2d95e853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bahrick, Harry P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggs, George E</creatorcontrib><title>Learning curves: Facts or artifacts?</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>"It is our purpose in this paper to show that the arbitrary choice of a cutoff point in the dichotomizing of continuous response distributions can impose significant constraints upon the shape of resulting learning curves, and that this can form the basis of misleading theoretical interpretations. We have chosen for illustration of this point the use of time-on-target scores as indicants of the level of skill attained in tracking tasks. However, we believe that the principles developed are quite general and apply to many learning situations." 18 references.</description><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Theoretical Interpretation</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1957</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MFKxDAQBuAgCtZV8BGK7sFLdZJJ2saLyOKqUPCi55AmqXapbU1aYd_elurR0zDMxwzzE3JO4ZoCZjcfAByQ4gGJqESZUC7EIYkAEBMmQR6TkxB2AJCJFCOyLpz2bd2-x2b03y7cxltthhB3PtZ-qKu5uTslR5Vugjv7rSvytn143Twlxcvj8-a-SDSCHBJmHNWitBKNRis14yKFyjljLaswZY7aNHcsZ6WWgMaUecZtPs2YlcLlAlfkYtnb--5rdGFQu2707XRSpZSzTHDECV3-hyiTac65ZHxSV4syvgvBu0r1vv7Ufq8oqDko9RfURNcL1b1Wfdib-XHTuKDKsVGCK1RsyuoHiThkkw</recordid><startdate>195705</startdate><enddate>195705</enddate><creator>Bahrick, Harry P</creator><creator>Fitts, Paul M</creator><creator>Briggs, George E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>195705</creationdate><title>Learning curves: Facts or artifacts?</title><author>Bahrick, Harry P ; Fitts, Paul M ; Briggs, George E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-2ce1a5bd93ca3d9a24560feecdd2f362e1d68e282ba903ccb874d8d2f2d95e853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1957</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Theoretical Interpretation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bahrick, Harry P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggs, George E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bahrick, Harry P</au><au>Fitts, Paul M</au><au>Briggs, George E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning curves: Facts or artifacts?</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>1957-05</date><risdate>1957</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>256-268</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>"It is our purpose in this paper to show that the arbitrary choice of a cutoff point in the dichotomizing of continuous response distributions can impose significant constraints upon the shape of resulting learning curves, and that this can form the basis of misleading theoretical interpretations. We have chosen for illustration of this point the use of time-on-target scores as indicants of the level of skill attained in tracking tasks. However, we believe that the principles developed are quite general and apply to many learning situations." 18 references.</abstract><cop>Washington, etc</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/h0040313</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 1957-05, Vol.54 (3), p.256-268 |
issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614275433 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Cognitive Processes Human Learning Theoretical Interpretation |
title | Learning curves: Facts or artifacts? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20curves:%20Facts%20or%20artifacts?&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Bahrick,%20Harry%20P&rft.date=1957-05&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=256-268&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0040313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1296844924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a309t-2ce1a5bd93ca3d9a24560feecdd2f362e1d68e282ba903ccb874d8d2f2d95e853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614275433&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |