Loading…

Environmental control of multiple defense responses in a conditioned burying paradigm

Three experiments with 52 male hooded rats examined the occurrence of conditioned burying, freezing, and escape in a situation in which there was the opportunity to engage in all 3 responses. The objective was to determine the defense response network of the rat in this situation and to document the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 1983-12, Vol.97 (4), p.338-352
Main Authors: Moser, Cathy G, Tait, Robert W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1489-e79d8ea75d37df77f5aaeb3f2c1a81477d70ea453d0223f03794baa6ebc6e0a03
cites
container_end_page 352
container_issue 4
container_start_page 338
container_title Journal of comparative psychology (1983)
container_volume 97
creator Moser, Cathy G
Tait, Robert W
description Three experiments with 52 male hooded rats examined the occurrence of conditioned burying, freezing, and escape in a situation in which there was the opportunity to engage in all 3 responses. The objective was to determine the defense response network of the rat in this situation and to document the interaction of different classes of defensive responses. Results of Exp I reveal that the average defensive response network was freezing, escaping, and later burying. In the 2nd and 3rd experiments, the novelty of either the prod or the escape route was manipulated in an attempt to alter the dominance of the defensive responses. It was observed that while the dominance of freezing and escape over burying could not be altered, the variability in defensive response networks and the absolute levels of the defensive responses were manipulable. Alternatives to the existing models of conditioned and unconditioned burying are discussed. (26 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0735-7036.97.4.338
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614282179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614282179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1489-e79d8ea75d37df77f5aaeb3f2c1a81477d70ea453d0223f03794baa6ebc6e0a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU9BvLamTds0R1nWD1jw4p7DtJksWdqkJq2w_96WFT3NHJ53Ph5C7jOWZoyLJyZ4mQjGq1SKtEg5ry_IKpNcJjmrxSVZ_QHX5CbGI2OsygqxIvut-7bBux7dCB1tvRuD76g3tJ-60Q4dUo0GXUQaMA5-biK1jsKCajta71DTZgon6w50gADaHvpbcmWgi3j3W9dk_7L93Lwlu4_X983zLoGsqGWCQuoaQZSaC22EMCUANtzkbQb1fJ7QgiEUJdcsz7mZH5VFA1Bh01bIgPE1eTjPHYL_mjCO6uin4OaVan4vr_NMyBnKz1AbfIwBjRqC7SGcVMbUYk8tctQiR0mhCjXbm0OP5xAMoIZ4aiGMtu0wqtb3_9gPtlxwgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614282179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental control of multiple defense responses in a conditioned burying paradigm</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Moser, Cathy G ; Tait, Robert W</creator><creatorcontrib>Moser, Cathy G ; Tait, Robert W</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments with 52 male hooded rats examined the occurrence of conditioned burying, freezing, and escape in a situation in which there was the opportunity to engage in all 3 responses. The objective was to determine the defense response network of the rat in this situation and to document the interaction of different classes of defensive responses. Results of Exp I reveal that the average defensive response network was freezing, escaping, and later burying. In the 2nd and 3rd experiments, the novelty of either the prod or the escape route was manipulated in an attempt to alter the dominance of the defensive responses. It was observed that while the dominance of freezing and escape over burying could not be altered, the variability in defensive response networks and the absolute levels of the defensive responses were manipulable. Alternatives to the existing models of conditioned and unconditioned burying are discussed. (26 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.97.4.338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal Defensive Behavior ; Animal Environments ; Animal Escape Behavior ; Conditioned Responses ; Rats ; Tonic Immobility</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 1983-12, Vol.97 (4), p.338-352</ispartof><rights>1983 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1983, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1489-e79d8ea75d37df77f5aaeb3f2c1a81477d70ea453d0223f03794baa6ebc6e0a03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moser, Cathy G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Robert W</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental control of multiple defense responses in a conditioned burying paradigm</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><description>Three experiments with 52 male hooded rats examined the occurrence of conditioned burying, freezing, and escape in a situation in which there was the opportunity to engage in all 3 responses. The objective was to determine the defense response network of the rat in this situation and to document the interaction of different classes of defensive responses. Results of Exp I reveal that the average defensive response network was freezing, escaping, and later burying. In the 2nd and 3rd experiments, the novelty of either the prod or the escape route was manipulated in an attempt to alter the dominance of the defensive responses. It was observed that while the dominance of freezing and escape over burying could not be altered, the variability in defensive response networks and the absolute levels of the defensive responses were manipulable. Alternatives to the existing models of conditioned and unconditioned burying are discussed. (26 ref)</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal Defensive Behavior</subject><subject>Animal Environments</subject><subject>Animal Escape Behavior</subject><subject>Conditioned Responses</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Tonic Immobility</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU9BvLamTds0R1nWD1jw4p7DtJksWdqkJq2w_96WFT3NHJ53Ph5C7jOWZoyLJyZ4mQjGq1SKtEg5ry_IKpNcJjmrxSVZ_QHX5CbGI2OsygqxIvut-7bBux7dCB1tvRuD76g3tJ-60Q4dUo0GXUQaMA5-biK1jsKCajta71DTZgon6w50gADaHvpbcmWgi3j3W9dk_7L93Lwlu4_X983zLoGsqGWCQuoaQZSaC22EMCUANtzkbQb1fJ7QgiEUJdcsz7mZH5VFA1Bh01bIgPE1eTjPHYL_mjCO6uin4OaVan4vr_NMyBnKz1AbfIwBjRqC7SGcVMbUYk8tctQiR0mhCjXbm0OP5xAMoIZ4aiGMtu0wqtb3_9gPtlxwgQ</recordid><startdate>198312</startdate><enddate>198312</enddate><creator>Moser, Cathy G</creator><creator>Tait, Robert W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198312</creationdate><title>Environmental control of multiple defense responses in a conditioned burying paradigm</title><author>Moser, Cathy G ; Tait, Robert W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1489-e79d8ea75d37df77f5aaeb3f2c1a81477d70ea453d0223f03794baa6ebc6e0a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal Defensive Behavior</topic><topic>Animal Environments</topic><topic>Animal Escape Behavior</topic><topic>Conditioned Responses</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Tonic Immobility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moser, Cathy G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Robert W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moser, Cathy G</au><au>Tait, Robert W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental control of multiple defense responses in a conditioned burying paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><date>1983-12</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>338-352</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Three experiments with 52 male hooded rats examined the occurrence of conditioned burying, freezing, and escape in a situation in which there was the opportunity to engage in all 3 responses. The objective was to determine the defense response network of the rat in this situation and to document the interaction of different classes of defensive responses. Results of Exp I reveal that the average defensive response network was freezing, escaping, and later burying. In the 2nd and 3rd experiments, the novelty of either the prod or the escape route was manipulated in an attempt to alter the dominance of the defensive responses. It was observed that while the dominance of freezing and escape over burying could not be altered, the variability in defensive response networks and the absolute levels of the defensive responses were manipulable. Alternatives to the existing models of conditioned and unconditioned burying are discussed. (26 ref)</abstract><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0735-7036.97.4.338</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7036
ispartof Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 1983-12, Vol.97 (4), p.338-352
issn 0735-7036
1939-2087
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614282179
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Animal
Animal Defensive Behavior
Animal Environments
Animal Escape Behavior
Conditioned Responses
Rats
Tonic Immobility
title Environmental control of multiple defense responses in a conditioned burying paradigm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A03%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20control%20of%20multiple%20defense%20responses%20in%20a%20conditioned%20burying%20paradigm&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Moser,%20Cathy%20G&rft.date=1983-12&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=338-352&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7036.97.4.338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614282179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1489-e79d8ea75d37df77f5aaeb3f2c1a81477d70ea453d0223f03794baa6ebc6e0a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614282179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true