Loading…

Peculating Psychologists: Fraud and Abuse Against Medicaid

Fraud and abuse by providers of Medicaid services remain a largely unexplored area of scientific inquiry. This study presents information on psychologists who have been either criminally or administratively sanctioned for violations of laws governing the Medicaid program. Mental health practitioners...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1985-12, Vol.16 (6), p.823-832
Main Authors: GEIS, GOLBERT, PONTELL, HENRY N, KEENAN, CONSTANCE, ROSOFF, STEPHEN M, O'BRIEN, MARY JANE, JESILOW, PAUL D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-bfaee020631233ed968d80c842ca4a719bbfbb8175d6b674dff0f03ffeb6c1d23
cites
container_end_page 832
container_issue 6
container_start_page 823
container_title Professional psychology, research and practice
container_volume 16
creator GEIS, GOLBERT
PONTELL, HENRY N
KEENAN, CONSTANCE
ROSOFF, STEPHEN M
O'BRIEN, MARY JANE
JESILOW, PAUL D
description Fraud and abuse by providers of Medicaid services remain a largely unexplored area of scientific inquiry. This study presents information on psychologists who have been either criminally or administratively sanctioned for violations of laws governing the Medicaid program. Mental health practitioners are disproportionately sanctioned compared to their numbers in the program, a situation at least partly due to the fact that they bill according to time spent with patients, making them easier enforcement targets. Interviews with 8 sanctioned psychologists and 40 state and federal officials involved in administrative and enforcement activities revealed that sanctioned psychologists were commonly charged with filing false claims, felt they were treated unfairly by the system, and resented the low reimbursement rates and paperwork involved with Medicaid. Almost all violators strongly denied personal blame for their behavior. These and related findings are discussed within the context of increased official scrutiny of professionals who participate in government medical benefit programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0735-7028.16.6.823
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614288632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614288632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-bfaee020631233ed968d80c842ca4a719bbfbb8175d6b674dff0f03ffeb6c1d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwIyaEWBPOvtRxRlRRQKpEB5its2OXVCEJdjr035OoVZhu-d53eo-xOw4pB8yfIMdFkoNQKZepTJXAMzbjBRYJR4HnbDYBl-wqxh0AIOJixm43zu5r6qtme7-JB_vd1u22in28Zhee6uhuTnfOvlYvn8u3ZP3x-r58XieEKPrEeHIOBEjkAtGVhVSlAqsyYSmjnBfGeGMUzxelNDLPSu_BA3rvjLS8FDhnD0dvF9rfvYu93rX70AwvteSZUEriCIkjZEMbY3Bed6H6oXDQHPQ4gB776bGf5lJLPQwwhB5PZoqWah-osVWckkpCBoN9wqgj3Q0TUOgrW7uRbP9tf0eOZhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614288632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peculating Psychologists: Fraud and Abuse Against Medicaid</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>GEIS, GOLBERT ; PONTELL, HENRY N ; KEENAN, CONSTANCE ; ROSOFF, STEPHEN M ; O'BRIEN, MARY JANE ; JESILOW, PAUL D</creator><creatorcontrib>GEIS, GOLBERT ; PONTELL, HENRY N ; KEENAN, CONSTANCE ; ROSOFF, STEPHEN M ; O'BRIEN, MARY JANE ; JESILOW, PAUL D</creatorcontrib><description>Fraud and abuse by providers of Medicaid services remain a largely unexplored area of scientific inquiry. This study presents information on psychologists who have been either criminally or administratively sanctioned for violations of laws governing the Medicaid program. Mental health practitioners are disproportionately sanctioned compared to their numbers in the program, a situation at least partly due to the fact that they bill according to time spent with patients, making them easier enforcement targets. Interviews with 8 sanctioned psychologists and 40 state and federal officials involved in administrative and enforcement activities revealed that sanctioned psychologists were commonly charged with filing false claims, felt they were treated unfairly by the system, and resented the low reimbursement rates and paperwork involved with Medicaid. Almost all violators strongly denied personal blame for their behavior. These and related findings are discussed within the context of increased official scrutiny of professionals who participate in government medical benefit programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.16.6.823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PFPSAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Crime ; Government Programs ; Health Insurance ; Health staff related problems. Vocational training ; Human ; Medical sciences ; Professional Ethics ; Psychologists ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychotherapist Attitudes ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 1985-12, Vol.16 (6), p.823-832</ispartof><rights>1985 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1985, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-bfaee020631233ed968d80c842ca4a719bbfbb8175d6b674dff0f03ffeb6c1d23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8604086$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GEIS, GOLBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PONTELL, HENRY N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEENAN, CONSTANCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSOFF, STEPHEN M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'BRIEN, MARY JANE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JESILOW, PAUL D</creatorcontrib><title>Peculating Psychologists: Fraud and Abuse Against Medicaid</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>Fraud and abuse by providers of Medicaid services remain a largely unexplored area of scientific inquiry. This study presents information on psychologists who have been either criminally or administratively sanctioned for violations of laws governing the Medicaid program. Mental health practitioners are disproportionately sanctioned compared to their numbers in the program, a situation at least partly due to the fact that they bill according to time spent with patients, making them easier enforcement targets. Interviews with 8 sanctioned psychologists and 40 state and federal officials involved in administrative and enforcement activities revealed that sanctioned psychologists were commonly charged with filing false claims, felt they were treated unfairly by the system, and resented the low reimbursement rates and paperwork involved with Medicaid. Almost all violators strongly denied personal blame for their behavior. These and related findings are discussed within the context of increased official scrutiny of professionals who participate in government medical benefit programs.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Government Programs</subject><subject>Health Insurance</subject><subject>Health staff related problems. Vocational training</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Professional Ethics</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapist Attitudes</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqWwIyaEWBPOvtRxRlRRQKpEB5its2OXVCEJdjr035OoVZhu-d53eo-xOw4pB8yfIMdFkoNQKZepTJXAMzbjBRYJR4HnbDYBl-wqxh0AIOJixm43zu5r6qtme7-JB_vd1u22in28Zhee6uhuTnfOvlYvn8u3ZP3x-r58XieEKPrEeHIOBEjkAtGVhVSlAqsyYSmjnBfGeGMUzxelNDLPSu_BA3rvjLS8FDhnD0dvF9rfvYu93rX70AwvteSZUEriCIkjZEMbY3Bed6H6oXDQHPQ4gB776bGf5lJLPQwwhB5PZoqWah-osVWckkpCBoN9wqgj3Q0TUOgrW7uRbP9tf0eOZhc</recordid><startdate>19851201</startdate><enddate>19851201</enddate><creator>GEIS, GOLBERT</creator><creator>PONTELL, HENRY N</creator><creator>KEENAN, CONSTANCE</creator><creator>ROSOFF, STEPHEN M</creator><creator>O'BRIEN, MARY JANE</creator><creator>JESILOW, PAUL D</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19851201</creationdate><title>Peculating Psychologists</title><author>GEIS, GOLBERT ; PONTELL, HENRY N ; KEENAN, CONSTANCE ; ROSOFF, STEPHEN M ; O'BRIEN, MARY JANE ; JESILOW, PAUL D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-bfaee020631233ed968d80c842ca4a719bbfbb8175d6b674dff0f03ffeb6c1d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Government Programs</topic><topic>Health Insurance</topic><topic>Health staff related problems. Vocational training</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Professional Ethics</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapist Attitudes</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GEIS, GOLBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PONTELL, HENRY N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEENAN, CONSTANCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSOFF, STEPHEN M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'BRIEN, MARY JANE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JESILOW, PAUL D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GEIS, GOLBERT</au><au>PONTELL, HENRY N</au><au>KEENAN, CONSTANCE</au><au>ROSOFF, STEPHEN M</au><au>O'BRIEN, MARY JANE</au><au>JESILOW, PAUL D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peculating Psychologists: Fraud and Abuse Against Medicaid</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>1985-12-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>832</epage><pages>823-832</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><coden>PFPSAP</coden><abstract>Fraud and abuse by providers of Medicaid services remain a largely unexplored area of scientific inquiry. This study presents information on psychologists who have been either criminally or administratively sanctioned for violations of laws governing the Medicaid program. Mental health practitioners are disproportionately sanctioned compared to their numbers in the program, a situation at least partly due to the fact that they bill according to time spent with patients, making them easier enforcement targets. Interviews with 8 sanctioned psychologists and 40 state and federal officials involved in administrative and enforcement activities revealed that sanctioned psychologists were commonly charged with filing false claims, felt they were treated unfairly by the system, and resented the low reimbursement rates and paperwork involved with Medicaid. Almost all violators strongly denied personal blame for their behavior. These and related findings are discussed within the context of increased official scrutiny of professionals who participate in government medical benefit programs.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0735-7028.16.6.823</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7028
ispartof Professional psychology, research and practice, 1985-12, Vol.16 (6), p.823-832
issn 0735-7028
1939-1323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614288632
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Crime
Government Programs
Health Insurance
Health staff related problems. Vocational training
Human
Medical sciences
Professional Ethics
Psychologists
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychotherapist Attitudes
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
title Peculating Psychologists: Fraud and Abuse Against Medicaid
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A48%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peculating%20Psychologists:%20Fraud%20and%20Abuse%20Against%20Medicaid&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=GEIS,%20GOLBERT&rft.date=1985-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=832&rft.pages=823-832&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft.coden=PFPSAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7028.16.6.823&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614288632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a332t-bfaee020631233ed968d80c842ca4a719bbfbb8175d6b674dff0f03ffeb6c1d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614288632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true