Loading…

The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males

Obtained semantic differential ratings from 40 male college students on 12 scales of 15 slides depicting sexual behavior. In addition, the time spent looking at each slide was recorded. Results indicate that the meaning structure of pornography involved only the evaluative and activity factors. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of behavioural science 1972-07, Vol.4 (3), p.204-209
Main Author: Ware, Edward E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-4c13807bd3142344954f96bb3b374b881b256bd365dd9e1503e03adfeeef7daf3
cites
container_end_page 209
container_issue 3
container_start_page 204
container_title Canadian journal of behavioural science
container_volume 4
creator Ware, Edward E
description Obtained semantic differential ratings from 40 male college students on 12 scales of 15 slides depicting sexual behavior. In addition, the time spent looking at each slide was recorded. Results indicate that the meaning structure of pornography involved only the evaluative and activity factors. The potency factor, usually found in other domains of concepts, collapsed into this 2-space and provided no further information. High ratings of pornography were closely associated with low evaluative ratings and high activity ratings, i.e., very pornographic material was seen as bad, unpleasant, dirty, and harmful; and also as active, hot, and stimulating. Looking time was closely related to the activity factor ratings of the slides and moderately related to the evaluative ratings. Thus, the determinants of looking time were the same as those of the pornography ratings, but with their relative contributions reversed. (French summary)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0082305
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614291247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614291247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-4c13807bd3142344954f96bb3b374b881b256bd365dd9e1503e03adfeeef7daf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI6CPyHoxk0177YbQQZfMOBmBHchaW_aDm1Tk85i_r2R6upyz_04l3MQuqbknhKeP7SEFIwTeYJWtMjLjClVnqIVSXImCPk6Rxcx7tOqpBQr9LhrAUcYzDh3FR7AjN3YYO_w5MPom2CmNulx7oZD32HnA65830MDeDA9xEt05kwf4epvrtHny_Nu85ZtP17fN0_bzDDK5kxUlBcktzWngnEhSilcqazllufCFgW1TKp0VbKuS6CScCDc1A4AXF4bx9foZvGdgv8-QJz13h_CmF5qlSxLykSeoLsFqoKPMYDTU-gGE46aEv1bjv4vJ6G3C2omo6d4rExI-VMgXdmoheaaEcF_AHNKYi8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614291247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Ware, Edward E</creator><creatorcontrib>Ware, Edward E</creatorcontrib><description>Obtained semantic differential ratings from 40 male college students on 12 scales of 15 slides depicting sexual behavior. In addition, the time spent looking at each slide was recorded. Results indicate that the meaning structure of pornography involved only the evaluative and activity factors. The potency factor, usually found in other domains of concepts, collapsed into this 2-space and provided no further information. High ratings of pornography were closely associated with low evaluative ratings and high activity ratings, i.e., very pornographic material was seen as bad, unpleasant, dirty, and harmful; and also as active, hot, and stimulating. Looking time was closely related to the activity factor ratings of the slides and moderately related to the evaluative ratings. Thus, the determinants of looking time were the same as those of the pornography ratings, but with their relative contributions reversed. (French summary)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-400X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0082305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Toronto Press</publisher><subject>Human ; Inhibition (Personality) ; Pornography</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of behavioural science, 1972-07, Vol.4 (3), p.204-209</ispartof><rights>1972 Canadian Psychological Association</rights><rights>1972, Canadian Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-4c13807bd3142344954f96bb3b374b881b256bd365dd9e1503e03adfeeef7daf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ware, Edward E</creatorcontrib><title>The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males</title><title>Canadian journal of behavioural science</title><description>Obtained semantic differential ratings from 40 male college students on 12 scales of 15 slides depicting sexual behavior. In addition, the time spent looking at each slide was recorded. Results indicate that the meaning structure of pornography involved only the evaluative and activity factors. The potency factor, usually found in other domains of concepts, collapsed into this 2-space and provided no further information. High ratings of pornography were closely associated with low evaluative ratings and high activity ratings, i.e., very pornographic material was seen as bad, unpleasant, dirty, and harmful; and also as active, hot, and stimulating. Looking time was closely related to the activity factor ratings of the slides and moderately related to the evaluative ratings. Thus, the determinants of looking time were the same as those of the pornography ratings, but with their relative contributions reversed. (French summary)</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inhibition (Personality)</subject><subject>Pornography</subject><issn>0008-400X</issn><issn>1879-2669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI6CPyHoxk0177YbQQZfMOBmBHchaW_aDm1Tk85i_r2R6upyz_04l3MQuqbknhKeP7SEFIwTeYJWtMjLjClVnqIVSXImCPk6Rxcx7tOqpBQr9LhrAUcYzDh3FR7AjN3YYO_w5MPom2CmNulx7oZD32HnA65830MDeDA9xEt05kwf4epvrtHny_Nu85ZtP17fN0_bzDDK5kxUlBcktzWngnEhSilcqazllufCFgW1TKp0VbKuS6CScCDc1A4AXF4bx9foZvGdgv8-QJz13h_CmF5qlSxLykSeoLsFqoKPMYDTU-gGE46aEv1bjv4vJ6G3C2omo6d4rExI-VMgXdmoheaaEcF_AHNKYi8</recordid><startdate>19720701</startdate><enddate>19720701</enddate><creator>Ware, Edward E</creator><general>University of Toronto Press</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19720701</creationdate><title>The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males</title><author>Ware, Edward E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-4c13807bd3142344954f96bb3b374b881b256bd365dd9e1503e03adfeeef7daf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inhibition (Personality)</topic><topic>Pornography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ware, Edward E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ware, Edward E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of behavioural science</jtitle><date>1972-07-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>204-209</pages><issn>0008-400X</issn><eissn>1879-2669</eissn><abstract>Obtained semantic differential ratings from 40 male college students on 12 scales of 15 slides depicting sexual behavior. In addition, the time spent looking at each slide was recorded. Results indicate that the meaning structure of pornography involved only the evaluative and activity factors. The potency factor, usually found in other domains of concepts, collapsed into this 2-space and provided no further information. High ratings of pornography were closely associated with low evaluative ratings and high activity ratings, i.e., very pornographic material was seen as bad, unpleasant, dirty, and harmful; and also as active, hot, and stimulating. Looking time was closely related to the activity factor ratings of the slides and moderately related to the evaluative ratings. Thus, the determinants of looking time were the same as those of the pornography ratings, but with their relative contributions reversed. (French summary)</abstract><pub>University of Toronto Press</pub><doi>10.1037/h0082305</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-400X
ispartof Canadian journal of behavioural science, 1972-07, Vol.4 (3), p.204-209
issn 0008-400X
1879-2669
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614291247
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Human
Inhibition (Personality)
Pornography
title The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20semantic%20meaning%20of%20pornographic%20stimuli%20for%20college%20males&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20behavioural%20science&rft.au=Ware,%20Edward%20E&rft.date=1972-07-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=204-209&rft.issn=0008-400X&rft.eissn=1879-2669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0082305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614291247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a212t-4c13807bd3142344954f96bb3b374b881b256bd365dd9e1503e03adfeeef7daf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614291247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true