The Effects of Purpose of Appraisal and Individual Differences in Stereotypes of Women on Sex Differences in Performance Ratings: A Laboratory and Field Study

• Published in: Journal of applied psychology 1988-08, Vol.73 (3), p.551-558
• Main Authors: Dobbins, Gregory H, Cardy, Robert L, Truxillo, Donald M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Goals; Human; Human Sex Differences; Occupational psychology; Personnel Evaluation; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Psychometrics; Rating; Sex Role Attitudes; Stereotyped Attitudes
• ISSN: 0021-9010; 1939-1854
• DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.551

We investigated the effects of purpose of appraisal and individual differences in stereotypes of women on the evaluations of male and female ratees in two studies. In Study 1, 52 female and 51 male undergraduate students with traditional or nontraditional stereotypes of women evaluated written vignettes of either male or female ratees. Raters were informed that their evaluations would be used for scale development (experimental purposes) or for merit pay and promotion decisions (administrative decisions). Analyses revealed that female ratees were evaluated less accurately by raters with traditional stereotypes of women than by raters with nontraditional stereotypes of women. Such differences occurred, however, only when appraisals were made for administrative decisions. In Study 2, 810 raters with traditional or nontraditional stereotypes of women evaluated the teaching effectiveness of eight male and six female professors. Analyses indicated that women were evaluated more favorably by raters with nontraditional stereotypes of women than by raters with traditional stereotypes of women. Implications of the findings for sex differences in appraisal, future research, and organizational effectiveness are discussed.