Loading…
Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing
Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that ben...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of educational psychology 1995-03, Vol.87 (1), p.103-116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 116 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Rocklin, Thomas R O'Donnell, Angela M Holst, Patricia M |
description | Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614314232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614314232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVF3AV1J2kziWZySyL1AtUXNiuh5O5aEqaxJl00bd3QktBUVfDHL5zfvgRuiR4QjATdxhTmmLO2aQQEzLMjtCISCZTSgQ_RqMDOEVnIawwxix-RkjOnLO6Dwk0Jlk2xvp6WzXvyYvVH9BUYR2S1iVvtnbp1EDXW5MsbOgjOUcnDupgL_bvGC0fZov7p3T--vh8P52nkFHWp1I4AJaT0kqgVuQZGCiZpiXgTBhJsrJ0GmxhSJlziW2uM2csdy7numBlycboane38-3nJmarVbvxTYxUnGSMxBT6H6IESyEY4xFd_4UIlTjn-dDJGNGd0r4NwVunOl-twW8VwWooWw1dqqFLVQhFhllcutmfhqChdh4aXYXDJssyzmkR2e2OQQeqC1sNvq90bYPeeG-bXlmz-eXoT_2dfQFobZjH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614314232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rocklin, Thomas R ; O'Donnell, Angela M ; Holst, Patricia M</creator><contributor>Levin, Joel R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rocklin, Thomas R ; O'Donnell, Angela M ; Holst, Patricia M ; Levin, Joel R</creatorcontrib><description>Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptive Testing ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Computerized Assessment ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Item Analysis (Statistical) ; Orientation. Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social research ; Tests</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 1995-03, Vol.87 (1), p.103-116</ispartof><rights>1995 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 1995</rights><rights>1995, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3446628$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Levin, Joel R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rocklin, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holst, Patricia M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.</description><subject>Adaptive Testing</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computerized Assessment</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Item Analysis (Statistical)</subject><subject>Orientation. Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVF3AV1J2kziWZySyL1AtUXNiuh5O5aEqaxJl00bd3QktBUVfDHL5zfvgRuiR4QjATdxhTmmLO2aQQEzLMjtCISCZTSgQ_RqMDOEVnIawwxix-RkjOnLO6Dwk0Jlk2xvp6WzXvyYvVH9BUYR2S1iVvtnbp1EDXW5MsbOgjOUcnDupgL_bvGC0fZov7p3T--vh8P52nkFHWp1I4AJaT0kqgVuQZGCiZpiXgTBhJsrJ0GmxhSJlziW2uM2csdy7numBlycboane38-3nJmarVbvxTYxUnGSMxBT6H6IESyEY4xFd_4UIlTjn-dDJGNGd0r4NwVunOl-twW8VwWooWw1dqqFLVQhFhllcutmfhqChdh4aXYXDJssyzmkR2e2OQQeqC1sNvq90bYPeeG-bXlmz-eXoT_2dfQFobZjH</recordid><startdate>19950301</startdate><enddate>19950301</enddate><creator>Rocklin, Thomas R</creator><creator>O'Donnell, Angela M</creator><creator>Holst, Patricia M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950301</creationdate><title>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</title><author>Rocklin, Thomas R ; O'Donnell, Angela M ; Holst, Patricia M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adaptive Testing</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computerized Assessment</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Item Analysis (Statistical)</topic><topic>Orientation. Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocklin, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holst, Patricia M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocklin, Thomas R</au><au>O'Donnell, Angela M</au><au>Holst, Patricia M</au><au>Levin, Joel R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>1995-03-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>103-116</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPA5</coden><abstract>Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 1995-03, Vol.87 (1), p.103-116 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614314232 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adaptive Testing Biological and medical sciences College students Computerized Assessment Educational psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Item Analysis (Statistical) Orientation. Evaluation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social research Tests |
title | Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A09%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20and%20Underlying%20Mechanisms%20of%20Self-Adapted%20Testing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Rocklin,%20Thomas%20R&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=103-116&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614314232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614314232&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |