Loading…

Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing

Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that ben...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of educational psychology 1995-03, Vol.87 (1), p.103-116
Main Authors: Rocklin, Thomas R, O'Donnell, Angela M, Holst, Patricia M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3
cites
container_end_page 116
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Journal of educational psychology
container_volume 87
creator Rocklin, Thomas R
O'Donnell, Angela M
Holst, Patricia M
description Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614314232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614314232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVF3AV1J2kziWZySyL1AtUXNiuh5O5aEqaxJl00bd3QktBUVfDHL5zfvgRuiR4QjATdxhTmmLO2aQQEzLMjtCISCZTSgQ_RqMDOEVnIawwxix-RkjOnLO6Dwk0Jlk2xvp6WzXvyYvVH9BUYR2S1iVvtnbp1EDXW5MsbOgjOUcnDupgL_bvGC0fZov7p3T--vh8P52nkFHWp1I4AJaT0kqgVuQZGCiZpiXgTBhJsrJ0GmxhSJlziW2uM2csdy7numBlycboane38-3nJmarVbvxTYxUnGSMxBT6H6IESyEY4xFd_4UIlTjn-dDJGNGd0r4NwVunOl-twW8VwWooWw1dqqFLVQhFhllcutmfhqChdh4aXYXDJssyzmkR2e2OQQeqC1sNvq90bYPeeG-bXlmz-eXoT_2dfQFobZjH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614314232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rocklin, Thomas R ; O'Donnell, Angela M ; Holst, Patricia M</creator><contributor>Levin, Joel R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rocklin, Thomas R ; O'Donnell, Angela M ; Holst, Patricia M ; Levin, Joel R</creatorcontrib><description>Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptive Testing ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Computerized Assessment ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Item Analysis (Statistical) ; Orientation. Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social research ; Tests</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 1995-03, Vol.87 (1), p.103-116</ispartof><rights>1995 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 1995</rights><rights>1995, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3446628$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Levin, Joel R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rocklin, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holst, Patricia M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.</description><subject>Adaptive Testing</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computerized Assessment</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Item Analysis (Statistical)</subject><subject>Orientation. Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVF3AV1J2kziWZySyL1AtUXNiuh5O5aEqaxJl00bd3QktBUVfDHL5zfvgRuiR4QjATdxhTmmLO2aQQEzLMjtCISCZTSgQ_RqMDOEVnIawwxix-RkjOnLO6Dwk0Jlk2xvp6WzXvyYvVH9BUYR2S1iVvtnbp1EDXW5MsbOgjOUcnDupgL_bvGC0fZov7p3T--vh8P52nkFHWp1I4AJaT0kqgVuQZGCiZpiXgTBhJsrJ0GmxhSJlziW2uM2csdy7numBlycboane38-3nJmarVbvxTYxUnGSMxBT6H6IESyEY4xFd_4UIlTjn-dDJGNGd0r4NwVunOl-twW8VwWooWw1dqqFLVQhFhllcutmfhqChdh4aXYXDJssyzmkR2e2OQQeqC1sNvq90bYPeeG-bXlmz-eXoT_2dfQFobZjH</recordid><startdate>19950301</startdate><enddate>19950301</enddate><creator>Rocklin, Thomas R</creator><creator>O'Donnell, Angela M</creator><creator>Holst, Patricia M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>American Psychological Association, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950301</creationdate><title>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</title><author>Rocklin, Thomas R ; O'Donnell, Angela M ; Holst, Patricia M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adaptive Testing</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computerized Assessment</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Item Analysis (Statistical)</topic><topic>Orientation. Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocklin, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holst, Patricia M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocklin, Thomas R</au><au>O'Donnell, Angela M</au><au>Holst, Patricia M</au><au>Levin, Joel R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>1995-03-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>103-116</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPA5</coden><abstract>Undergraduates participated in 3 experiments related to self-adapted testing. Experiment 1 demonstrated that, in comparison with computerized adaptive testing, self-adapted testing reduced the influence of anxiety on performance but took longer and was less efficient. Experiment 2 indicated that benefits of self-adapted testing cannot be attributed solely to item ordering. Instead, active choice of item difficulty seems to be necessary. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the provision of feedback increased the efficiency of the test but had no effect on estimates of ability derived. The potential of self-adapted testing to reduce the influence of extraneous sources of variation in test performance is discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0663
ispartof Journal of educational psychology, 1995-03, Vol.87 (1), p.103-116
issn 0022-0663
1939-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614314232
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adaptive Testing
Biological and medical sciences
College students
Computerized Assessment
Educational psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Item Analysis (Statistical)
Orientation. Evaluation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social research
Tests
title Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Self-Adapted Testing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A09%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20and%20Underlying%20Mechanisms%20of%20Self-Adapted%20Testing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Rocklin,%20Thomas%20R&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=103-116&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614314232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-97faa351be9a2e754adab3c2ba047d914bbfcae8d1b5690e5c4fde6ff56c83bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614314232&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true