The Relations Between Observer-Rating and Self-Report of Depressive Symptomatology

Sources of discrepancy between the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were investigated in 114 depressed inpatients treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Three previously reported observations were found to occur within the same sample: (a) There wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological assessment 1993-09, Vol.5 (3), p.350-360
Main Authors: Sayer, Nina A, Sackeim, Harold A, Moeller, James R, Prudic, Joan, Devanand, D. P, Coleman, Eliza A, Kiersky, Judith E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Beck Depression Inventory
Biological and medical sciences
Human
Major Depression
Medical sciences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Rating Scales
Techniques and methods
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a270t-5f38119ab1dd06e4b7b1dd323f5b24eb3f7b3b7213427e1c34d50c0f03d35abe3
cites
container_end_page 360
container_issue 3
container_start_page 350
container_title Psychological assessment
container_volume 5
creator Sayer, Nina A
Sackeim, Harold A
Moeller, James R
Prudic, Joan
Devanand, D. P
Coleman, Eliza A
Kiersky, Judith E
description Sources of discrepancy between the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were investigated in 114 depressed inpatients treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Three previously reported observations were found to occur within the same sample: (a) There was only a moderate baseline correlation between the measures; (b) this correlation improved markedly at later assessment; (c) the HRSD had a greater effect size for change. The modest baseline correlation was largely due to patients who rated themselves as substantially less depressed than clinicians had rated them. Improvement in the correlation with repeated assessment was due to the representation of clinical responders. The larger effect size with the HRSD was mainly attributable to a small subgroup that showed marked deterioration on the BDI, a phenomenon not observed with clinician evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.350
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614320509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1308826335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a270t-5f38119ab1dd06e4b7b1dd323f5b24eb3f7b3b7213427e1c34d50c0f03d35abe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxYMoWKsfwFtQr4mzmWyTHLX-hUKhreBt2SSzNSXNxt200m_vhmrx4mkezG_ezDzPu2QQMsDklkEMAfIMQh5iiByOvAHLMAsYxu_HTv_2T70za1cALMaUD7zZ4oP8GdWyq3Rj_Xvqvogaf5pbMlsywcw1mqUvm9KfU62CGbXadL5W_gO1hqyttuTPd-u202vZ6Vovd-feiZK1pYufOvTenh4X45dgMn1-Hd9NAhkl0AVcYcpYJnNWljCiOE96hREqnkcx5aiSHPMkcg9ECbEC45JDAQqwRC5zwqF3tfdtjf7ckO3ESm9M41aKkfsuAg6Zg67_gxhCmkYjRO4otqcKo601pERrqrU0O8FA9PmKPj_R5ye4QCfAzdz8OEtbyFoZ2RSVPQzGGbDk7wGylaK1u0KaripqcqS0B7NvYJOFtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614320509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relations Between Observer-Rating and Self-Report of Depressive Symptomatology</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Sayer, Nina A ; Sackeim, Harold A ; Moeller, James R ; Prudic, Joan ; Devanand, D. P ; Coleman, Eliza A ; Kiersky, Judith E</creator><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Nina A ; Sackeim, Harold A ; Moeller, James R ; Prudic, Joan ; Devanand, D. P ; Coleman, Eliza A ; Kiersky, Judith E</creatorcontrib><description>Sources of discrepancy between the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were investigated in 114 depressed inpatients treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Three previously reported observations were found to occur within the same sample: (a) There was only a moderate baseline correlation between the measures; (b) this correlation improved markedly at later assessment; (c) the HRSD had a greater effect size for change. The modest baseline correlation was largely due to patients who rated themselves as substantially less depressed than clinicians had rated them. Improvement in the correlation with repeated assessment was due to the representation of clinical responders. The larger effect size with the HRSD was mainly attributable to a small subgroup that showed marked deterioration on the BDI, a phenomenon not observed with clinician evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Beck Depression Inventory ; Biological and medical sciences ; Human ; Major Depression ; Medical sciences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Rating Scales ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 1993-09, Vol.5 (3), p.350-360</ispartof><rights>1993 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1993, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a270t-5f38119ab1dd06e4b7b1dd323f5b24eb3f7b3b7213427e1c34d50c0f03d35abe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4901709$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Nina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sackeim, Harold A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prudic, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanand, D. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Eliza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiersky, Judith E</creatorcontrib><title>The Relations Between Observer-Rating and Self-Report of Depressive Symptomatology</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><description>Sources of discrepancy between the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were investigated in 114 depressed inpatients treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Three previously reported observations were found to occur within the same sample: (a) There was only a moderate baseline correlation between the measures; (b) this correlation improved markedly at later assessment; (c) the HRSD had a greater effect size for change. The modest baseline correlation was largely due to patients who rated themselves as substantially less depressed than clinicians had rated them. Improvement in the correlation with repeated assessment was due to the representation of clinical responders. The larger effect size with the HRSD was mainly attributable to a small subgroup that showed marked deterioration on the BDI, a phenomenon not observed with clinician evaluation.</description><subject>Beck Depression Inventory</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Major Depression</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxYMoWKsfwFtQr4mzmWyTHLX-hUKhreBt2SSzNSXNxt200m_vhmrx4mkezG_ezDzPu2QQMsDklkEMAfIMQh5iiByOvAHLMAsYxu_HTv_2T70za1cALMaUD7zZ4oP8GdWyq3Rj_Xvqvogaf5pbMlsywcw1mqUvm9KfU62CGbXadL5W_gO1hqyttuTPd-u202vZ6Vovd-feiZK1pYufOvTenh4X45dgMn1-Hd9NAhkl0AVcYcpYJnNWljCiOE96hREqnkcx5aiSHPMkcg9ECbEC45JDAQqwRC5zwqF3tfdtjf7ckO3ESm9M41aKkfsuAg6Zg67_gxhCmkYjRO4otqcKo601pERrqrU0O8FA9PmKPj_R5ye4QCfAzdz8OEtbyFoZ2RSVPQzGGbDk7wGylaK1u0KaripqcqS0B7NvYJOFtA</recordid><startdate>19930901</startdate><enddate>19930901</enddate><creator>Sayer, Nina A</creator><creator>Sackeim, Harold A</creator><creator>Moeller, James R</creator><creator>Prudic, Joan</creator><creator>Devanand, D. P</creator><creator>Coleman, Eliza A</creator><creator>Kiersky, Judith E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>The Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930901</creationdate><title>The Relations Between Observer-Rating and Self-Report of Depressive Symptomatology</title><author>Sayer, Nina A ; Sackeim, Harold A ; Moeller, James R ; Prudic, Joan ; Devanand, D. P ; Coleman, Eliza A ; Kiersky, Judith E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a270t-5f38119ab1dd06e4b7b1dd323f5b24eb3f7b3b7213427e1c34d50c0f03d35abe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Beck Depression Inventory</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Major Depression</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Nina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sackeim, Harold A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prudic, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanand, D. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Eliza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiersky, Judith E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sayer, Nina A</au><au>Sackeim, Harold A</au><au>Moeller, James R</au><au>Prudic, Joan</au><au>Devanand, D. P</au><au>Coleman, Eliza A</au><au>Kiersky, Judith E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relations Between Observer-Rating and Self-Report of Depressive Symptomatology</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><date>1993-09-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>350-360</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>Sources of discrepancy between the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were investigated in 114 depressed inpatients treated with electroconvulsive therapy. Three previously reported observations were found to occur within the same sample: (a) There was only a moderate baseline correlation between the measures; (b) this correlation improved markedly at later assessment; (c) the HRSD had a greater effect size for change. The modest baseline correlation was largely due to patients who rated themselves as substantially less depressed than clinicians had rated them. Improvement in the correlation with repeated assessment was due to the representation of clinical responders. The larger effect size with the HRSD was mainly attributable to a small subgroup that showed marked deterioration on the BDI, a phenomenon not observed with clinician evaluation.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.350</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-3590
ispartof Psychological assessment, 1993-09, Vol.5 (3), p.350-360
issn 1040-3590
1939-134X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614320509
source PsycArticles (EBSCO)
subjects Beck Depression Inventory
Biological and medical sciences
Human
Major Depression
Medical sciences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Rating Scales
Techniques and methods
title The Relations Between Observer-Rating and Self-Report of Depressive Symptomatology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A12%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relations%20Between%20Observer-Rating%20and%20Self-Report%20of%20Depressive%20Symptomatology&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Sayer,%20Nina%20A&rft.date=1993-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=350-360&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308826335%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a270t-5f38119ab1dd06e4b7b1dd323f5b24eb3f7b3b7213427e1c34d50c0f03d35abe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614320509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true