Loading…
Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior
Predictions about the social causes of self-consciousness in groups were derived from the theory of deindividuation and tested in 3 experiments with 618 university students and adults. In Exp I, it was found that increasing group size was related to a decrease in self-consciousness. Group density di...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1980-09, Vol.39 (3), p.449-459 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-678cee0b1386e79ab506dff5ca2e29db1999a3695f4c88f645b4e612b5aeccd33 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 459 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Diener, Ed Lusk, Rob DeFour, Darlene Flax, Robert |
description | Predictions about the social causes of self-consciousness in groups were derived from the theory of deindividuation and tested in 3 experiments with 618 university students and adults. In Exp I, it was found that increasing group size was related to a decrease in self-consciousness. Group density did not influence self-consciousness. In Exp II, it was found that increases in the number of observers increased self-consciousness. In Exps I and II, self-reports of self-consciousness were independent of one's group, whereas the degree of behavioral disinhibition was highly correlated within groups. In Exp III, it was found that gender similarity within a group was related to lower self-consciousness. Findings support a perceptual/attentional model of self-consciousness within groups. Contrary to deindividuation theory predictions, however, behavior intensity did not vary across conditions in Exps I and II, even though self-consciousness did differ. This finding suggests that deindividuation theory is incomplete in its present form. (19 ref) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.449 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614330942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614330942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-678cee0b1386e79ab506dff5ca2e29db1999a3695f4c88f645b4e612b5aeccd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1uFDEQhC0EEkvgBThZwHFn8e_smBsKISBF4gJnyz9t4mjXHtwzKy1vwRszm43IiVOrVV91S1WEvOZsw5ncvmdMiE5qrjbSbORGKfOErLiRpuOS66dk9Q94Tl4g3jHGlBZiRf58glxiPuQ4uynX8oFepQRhQloT_dnqPFLMv2FNIxTM03FNy7z30E5y9QjtAA3X1JX4QO_hXsa8zzvXFgethSLsUhdqwZDrjAUQ7x0xYy632ecJIvVw6w65tpfkWXI7hFcP84L8-Hz1_fJLd_Pt-uvlx5vOSa6mrt8OAYB5LocetsZ5zfqYkg5OgDDRc2OMk73RSYVhSL3SXkHPhdcOQohSXpA357tjq79mwMne1bmV5aXtuZKSGSUW6O3_IC6MNkwOWi2UOFOhVcQGyY4t7107Ws7sqR97it-e4rfSWGmXfhbTu7PJjc6OeAyuTTnsAJdlfMT-Al9ckkU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614330942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Diener, Ed ; Lusk, Rob ; DeFour, Darlene ; Flax, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Diener, Ed ; Lusk, Rob ; DeFour, Darlene ; Flax, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Predictions about the social causes of self-consciousness in groups were derived from the theory of deindividuation and tested in 3 experiments with 618 university students and adults. In Exp I, it was found that increasing group size was related to a decrease in self-consciousness. Group density did not influence self-consciousness. In Exp II, it was found that increases in the number of observers increased self-consciousness. In Exps I and II, self-reports of self-consciousness were independent of one's group, whereas the degree of behavioral disinhibition was highly correlated within groups. In Exp III, it was found that gender similarity within a group was related to lower self-consciousness. Findings support a perceptual/attentional model of self-consciousness within groups. Contrary to deindividuation theory predictions, however, behavior intensity did not vary across conditions in Exps I and II, even though self-consciousness did differ. This finding suggests that deindividuation theory is incomplete in its present form. (19 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Group Size ; Human ; Inhibition (Personality) ; Interpersonal Influences ; Observers ; Self-Perception ; Social Density</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1980-09, Vol.39 (3), p.449-459</ispartof><rights>1980 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1980, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-678cee0b1386e79ab506dff5ca2e29db1999a3695f4c88f645b4e612b5aeccd33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diener, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lusk, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeFour, Darlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flax, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>Predictions about the social causes of self-consciousness in groups were derived from the theory of deindividuation and tested in 3 experiments with 618 university students and adults. In Exp I, it was found that increasing group size was related to a decrease in self-consciousness. Group density did not influence self-consciousness. In Exp II, it was found that increases in the number of observers increased self-consciousness. In Exps I and II, self-reports of self-consciousness were independent of one's group, whereas the degree of behavioral disinhibition was highly correlated within groups. In Exp III, it was found that gender similarity within a group was related to lower self-consciousness. Findings support a perceptual/attentional model of self-consciousness within groups. Contrary to deindividuation theory predictions, however, behavior intensity did not vary across conditions in Exps I and II, even though self-consciousness did differ. This finding suggests that deindividuation theory is incomplete in its present form. (19 ref)</description><subject>Group Size</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inhibition (Personality)</subject><subject>Interpersonal Influences</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>Self-Perception</subject><subject>Social Density</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1uFDEQhC0EEkvgBThZwHFn8e_smBsKISBF4gJnyz9t4mjXHtwzKy1vwRszm43IiVOrVV91S1WEvOZsw5ncvmdMiE5qrjbSbORGKfOErLiRpuOS66dk9Q94Tl4g3jHGlBZiRf58glxiPuQ4uynX8oFepQRhQloT_dnqPFLMv2FNIxTM03FNy7z30E5y9QjtAA3X1JX4QO_hXsa8zzvXFgethSLsUhdqwZDrjAUQ7x0xYy632ecJIvVw6w65tpfkWXI7hFcP84L8-Hz1_fJLd_Pt-uvlx5vOSa6mrt8OAYB5LocetsZ5zfqYkg5OgDDRc2OMk73RSYVhSL3SXkHPhdcOQohSXpA357tjq79mwMne1bmV5aXtuZKSGSUW6O3_IC6MNkwOWi2UOFOhVcQGyY4t7107Ws7sqR97it-e4rfSWGmXfhbTu7PJjc6OeAyuTTnsAJdlfMT-Al9ckkU</recordid><startdate>198009</startdate><enddate>198009</enddate><creator>Diener, Ed</creator><creator>Lusk, Rob</creator><creator>DeFour, Darlene</creator><creator>Flax, Robert</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198009</creationdate><title>Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior</title><author>Diener, Ed ; Lusk, Rob ; DeFour, Darlene ; Flax, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-678cee0b1386e79ab506dff5ca2e29db1999a3695f4c88f645b4e612b5aeccd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Group Size</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inhibition (Personality)</topic><topic>Interpersonal Influences</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>Self-Perception</topic><topic>Social Density</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diener, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lusk, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeFour, Darlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flax, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diener, Ed</au><au>Lusk, Rob</au><au>DeFour, Darlene</au><au>Flax, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1980-09</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>449-459</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>Predictions about the social causes of self-consciousness in groups were derived from the theory of deindividuation and tested in 3 experiments with 618 university students and adults. In Exp I, it was found that increasing group size was related to a decrease in self-consciousness. Group density did not influence self-consciousness. In Exp II, it was found that increases in the number of observers increased self-consciousness. In Exps I and II, self-reports of self-consciousness were independent of one's group, whereas the degree of behavioral disinhibition was highly correlated within groups. In Exp III, it was found that gender similarity within a group was related to lower self-consciousness. Findings support a perceptual/attentional model of self-consciousness within groups. Contrary to deindividuation theory predictions, however, behavior intensity did not vary across conditions in Exps I and II, even though self-consciousness did differ. This finding suggests that deindividuation theory is incomplete in its present form. (19 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.449</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 1980-09, Vol.39 (3), p.449-459 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_614330942 |
source | PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Group Size Human Inhibition (Personality) Interpersonal Influences Observers Self-Perception Social Density |
title | Deindividuation: Effects of group size, density, number of observers, and group member similarity on self-consciousness and disinhibited behavior |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deindividuation:%20Effects%20of%20group%20size,%20density,%20number%20of%20observers,%20and%20group%20member%20similarity%20on%20self-consciousness%20and%20disinhibited%20behavior&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Diener,%20Ed&rft.date=1980-09&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=449-459&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614330942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a314t-678cee0b1386e79ab506dff5ca2e29db1999a3695f4c88f645b4e612b5aeccd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614330942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |