Loading…

Concatenating Clinical Trials To One Another and Embedding Them Within One Another

We agree that Klein and Smith's (1999) vision for multisite efficacy/effectiveness intervention clinics possesses several advantages, but we ask whether these advantages may be had less ambitiously. Specifically, we suggest that if independent efficacy centers maintain their rigor and control b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Prevention & treatment 1999-03, Vol.2 (1), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified
Main Authors: Joiner, Thomas E, Voelz, Zachary R, Pettit, Jeremy W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page No Pagination Specified
container_issue 1
container_start_page No Pagination Specified
container_title Prevention & treatment
container_volume 2
creator Joiner, Thomas E
Voelz, Zachary R
Pettit, Jeremy W
description We agree that Klein and Smith's (1999) vision for multisite efficacy/effectiveness intervention clinics possesses several advantages, but we ask whether these advantages may be had less ambitiously. Specifically, we suggest that if independent efficacy centers maintain their rigor and control but simultaneously broaden to examine an array of effectiveness concerns, and if the results from independent centers are capably pooled by meta-analysts, much of what Klein and Smith envision may be accomplished.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/1522-3736.2.1.26c
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614335817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614335817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a967-e368e3e4d93b510e59033110bf636647058f14bf895e9c7d3525602a850b2d383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_Be2s-mjQ9LmX9AGFBCh5Dmk7dLN20Jt3D_ntbV3RPMwzPO8M8CN1TklLC80cqGEt4zmXKUpoyaS_Q4m92edZfo5sYd4TQjKt8gd7L3lszgjej85-47Jx31nS4Cs50EVc93njAK9-PWwjY-Aav9zU0zQxXW9jjDzdunT-nbtFVO2Xh7rcuUfW0rsqX5G3z_Fqu3hJTyDwBLhVwyJqC14ISEAXhnFJSt5JLmeVEqJZmdasKAYXNGy6YkIQZJUjNGq74Ej2c1g6h_zpAHPWuPwQ_XdRyeo4LRfMJoifIhj7GAK0egtubcNSU6FmcnsXoWYxmmupJ3P9iMxg9xKM1YXS2gzhl4YeaoG_4X2qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614335817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concatenating Clinical Trials To One Another and Embedding Them Within One Another</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Joiner, Thomas E ; Voelz, Zachary R ; Pettit, Jeremy W</creator><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E ; Voelz, Zachary R ; Pettit, Jeremy W</creatorcontrib><description>We agree that Klein and Smith's (1999) vision for multisite efficacy/effectiveness intervention clinics possesses several advantages, but we ask whether these advantages may be had less ambitiously. Specifically, we suggest that if independent efficacy centers maintain their rigor and control but simultaneously broaden to examine an array of effectiveness concerns, and if the results from independent centers are capably pooled by meta-analysts, much of what Klein and Smith envision may be accomplished.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-3736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-3736</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1522-3736.2.1.26c</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical Trials ; Community Mental Health Centers ; Community Psychiatry ; Drug Therapy ; Human ; Methodology ; Organizational Characteristics ; Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Prevention &amp; treatment, 1999-03, Vol.2 (1), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified</ispartof><rights>1999 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1999, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voelz, Zachary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Jeremy W</creatorcontrib><title>Concatenating Clinical Trials To One Another and Embedding Them Within One Another</title><title>Prevention &amp; treatment</title><description>We agree that Klein and Smith's (1999) vision for multisite efficacy/effectiveness intervention clinics possesses several advantages, but we ask whether these advantages may be had less ambitiously. Specifically, we suggest that if independent efficacy centers maintain their rigor and control but simultaneously broaden to examine an array of effectiveness concerns, and if the results from independent centers are capably pooled by meta-analysts, much of what Klein and Smith envision may be accomplished.</description><subject>Clinical Trials</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Centers</subject><subject>Community Psychiatry</subject><subject>Drug Therapy</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Organizational Characteristics</subject><subject>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</subject><issn>1522-3736</issn><issn>1522-3736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_Be2s-mjQ9LmX9AGFBCh5Dmk7dLN20Jt3D_ntbV3RPMwzPO8M8CN1TklLC80cqGEt4zmXKUpoyaS_Q4m92edZfo5sYd4TQjKt8gd7L3lszgjej85-47Jx31nS4Cs50EVc93njAK9-PWwjY-Aav9zU0zQxXW9jjDzdunT-nbtFVO2Xh7rcuUfW0rsqX5G3z_Fqu3hJTyDwBLhVwyJqC14ISEAXhnFJSt5JLmeVEqJZmdasKAYXNGy6YkIQZJUjNGq74Ej2c1g6h_zpAHPWuPwQ_XdRyeo4LRfMJoifIhj7GAK0egtubcNSU6FmcnsXoWYxmmupJ3P9iMxg9xKM1YXS2gzhl4YeaoG_4X2qw</recordid><startdate>199903</startdate><enddate>199903</enddate><creator>Joiner, Thomas E</creator><creator>Voelz, Zachary R</creator><creator>Pettit, Jeremy W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199903</creationdate><title>Concatenating Clinical Trials To One Another and Embedding Them Within One Another</title><author>Joiner, Thomas E ; Voelz, Zachary R ; Pettit, Jeremy W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a967-e368e3e4d93b510e59033110bf636647058f14bf895e9c7d3525602a850b2d383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Centers</topic><topic>Community Psychiatry</topic><topic>Drug Therapy</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Organizational Characteristics</topic><topic>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voelz, Zachary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Jeremy W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Prevention &amp; treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joiner, Thomas E</au><au>Voelz, Zachary R</au><au>Pettit, Jeremy W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concatenating Clinical Trials To One Another and Embedding Them Within One Another</atitle><jtitle>Prevention &amp; treatment</jtitle><date>1999-03</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>No Pagination Specified</spage><epage>No Pagination Specified</epage><pages>No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified</pages><issn>1522-3736</issn><eissn>1522-3736</eissn><abstract>We agree that Klein and Smith's (1999) vision for multisite efficacy/effectiveness intervention clinics possesses several advantages, but we ask whether these advantages may be had less ambitiously. Specifically, we suggest that if independent efficacy centers maintain their rigor and control but simultaneously broaden to examine an array of effectiveness concerns, and if the results from independent centers are capably pooled by meta-analysts, much of what Klein and Smith envision may be accomplished.</abstract><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/1522-3736.2.1.26c</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-3736
ispartof Prevention & treatment, 1999-03, Vol.2 (1), p.No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified
issn 1522-3736
1522-3736
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614335817
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Clinical Trials
Community Mental Health Centers
Community Psychiatry
Drug Therapy
Human
Methodology
Organizational Characteristics
Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation
title Concatenating Clinical Trials To One Another and Embedding Them Within One Another
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A03%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concatenating%20Clinical%20Trials%20To%20One%20Another%20and%20Embedding%20Them%20Within%20One%20Another&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20&%20treatment&rft.au=Joiner,%20Thomas%20E&rft.date=1999-03&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.epage=No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.pages=No%20Pagination%20Specified-No%20Pagination%20Specified&rft.issn=1522-3736&rft.eissn=1522-3736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1522-3736.2.1.26c&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614335817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a967-e368e3e4d93b510e59033110bf636647058f14bf895e9c7d3525602a850b2d383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614335817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true